1 00:00:01,000 --> 00:00:03,792 I'm going to tell you a story from 200 years ago. 2 00:00:04,792 --> 00:00:08,059 In 1820, French astronomer Alexis Bouvard 3 00:00:08,083 --> 00:00:13,309 almost became the second person in human history to discover a planet. 4 00:00:13,333 --> 00:00:16,643 He'd been tracking the position of Uranus across the night sky 5 00:00:16,667 --> 00:00:18,393 using old star catalogs, 6 00:00:18,417 --> 00:00:20,726 and it didn't quite go around the Sun 7 00:00:20,750 --> 00:00:23,184 the way that his predictions said it should. 8 00:00:23,208 --> 00:00:25,309 Sometimes it was a little too fast, 9 00:00:25,333 --> 00:00:27,018 sometimes a little too slow. 10 00:00:27,042 --> 00:00:30,768 Bouvard knew that his predictions were perfect. 11 00:00:30,792 --> 00:00:34,059 So it had to be that those old star catalogs were bad. 12 00:00:34,083 --> 00:00:36,143 He told astronomers of the day, 13 00:00:36,167 --> 00:00:38,601 "Do better measurements." 14 00:00:38,625 --> 00:00:39,893 So they did. 15 00:00:39,917 --> 00:00:42,059 Astronomers spent the next two decades 16 00:00:42,083 --> 00:00:46,143 meticulously tracking the position of Uranus across the sky, 17 00:00:46,167 --> 00:00:49,851 but it still didn't fit Bouvard's predictions. 18 00:00:49,875 --> 00:00:52,018 By 1840, it had become obvious. 19 00:00:52,042 --> 00:00:55,101 The problem was not with those old star catalogs, 20 00:00:55,125 --> 00:00:57,976 the problem was with the predictions. 21 00:00:58,000 --> 00:00:59,518 And astronomers knew why. 22 00:00:59,542 --> 00:01:03,726 They realized that there must be a distant, giant planet 23 00:01:03,750 --> 00:01:05,434 just beyond the orbit of Uranus 24 00:01:05,458 --> 00:01:07,268 that was tugging along at that orbit, 25 00:01:07,292 --> 00:01:09,851 sometimes pulling it along a bit too fast, 26 00:01:09,875 --> 00:01:11,542 sometimes holding it back. 27 00:01:12,750 --> 00:01:14,768 Must have been frustrating back in 1840 28 00:01:14,792 --> 00:01:18,184 to see these gravitational effects of this distant, giant planet 29 00:01:18,208 --> 00:01:21,976 but not yet know how to actually find it. 30 00:01:22,000 --> 00:01:24,059 Trust me, it's really frustrating. 31 00:01:24,083 --> 00:01:25,559 (Laughter) 32 00:01:25,583 --> 00:01:27,809 But in 1846, another French astronomer, 33 00:01:27,833 --> 00:01:29,143 Urbain Le Verrier, 34 00:01:29,167 --> 00:01:30,434 worked through the math 35 00:01:30,458 --> 00:01:33,184 and figured out how to predict the location of the planet. 36 00:01:33,208 --> 00:01:36,184 He sent his prediction to the Berlin observatory, 37 00:01:36,208 --> 00:01:37,643 they opened up their telescope 38 00:01:37,667 --> 00:01:40,726 and in the very first night they found this faint point of light 39 00:01:40,750 --> 00:01:42,851 slowly moving across the sky 40 00:01:42,875 --> 00:01:44,143 and discovered Neptune. 41 00:01:44,167 --> 00:01:48,292 It was this close on the sky to Le Verrier's predicted location. 42 00:01:49,875 --> 00:01:54,393 The story of prediction and discrepancy and new theory 43 00:01:54,417 --> 00:01:57,476 and triumphant discoveries is so classic 44 00:01:57,500 --> 00:02:00,393 and Le Verrier became so famous from it, 45 00:02:00,417 --> 00:02:03,143 that people tried to get in on the act right away. 46 00:02:03,167 --> 00:02:05,684 In the last 163 years, 47 00:02:05,708 --> 00:02:11,309 dozens of astronomers have used some sort of alleged orbital discrepancy 48 00:02:11,333 --> 00:02:15,250 to predict the existence of some new planet in the solar system. 49 00:02:16,292 --> 00:02:19,000 They have always been wrong. 50 00:02:20,125 --> 00:02:22,309 The most famous of these erroneous predictions 51 00:02:22,333 --> 00:02:23,768 came from Percival Lowell, 52 00:02:23,792 --> 00:02:28,518 who was convinced that there must be a planet just beyond Uranus and Neptune, 53 00:02:28,542 --> 00:02:30,518 messing with those orbits. 54 00:02:30,542 --> 00:02:33,101 And so when Pluto was discovered in 1930 55 00:02:33,125 --> 00:02:34,768 at the Lowell Observatory, 56 00:02:34,792 --> 00:02:39,226 everybody assumed that it must be the planet that Lowell had predicted. 57 00:02:39,250 --> 00:02:41,643 They were wrong. 58 00:02:41,667 --> 00:02:45,768 It turns out, Uranus and Neptune are exactly where they're supposed to be. 59 00:02:45,792 --> 00:02:47,351 It took 100 years, 60 00:02:47,375 --> 00:02:49,143 but Bouvard was eventually right. 61 00:02:49,167 --> 00:02:52,768 Astronomers needed to do better measurements. 62 00:02:52,792 --> 00:02:54,559 And when they did, 63 00:02:54,583 --> 00:02:57,768 those better measurements had turned out that 64 00:02:57,792 --> 00:03:02,809 there is no planet just beyond the orbit of Uranus and Neptune 65 00:03:02,833 --> 00:03:05,518 and Pluto is thousands of times too small 66 00:03:05,542 --> 00:03:08,184 to have any effect on those orbits at all. 67 00:03:08,208 --> 00:03:11,851 So even though Pluto turned out not to be the planet 68 00:03:11,875 --> 00:03:13,476 it was originally thought to be, 69 00:03:13,500 --> 00:03:16,934 it was the first discovery of what is now known to be 70 00:03:16,958 --> 00:03:21,684 thousands of tiny, icy objects in orbit beyond the planets. 71 00:03:21,708 --> 00:03:24,601 Here you can see the orbits of Jupiter, 72 00:03:24,625 --> 00:03:27,143 Saturn, Uranus and Neptune, 73 00:03:27,167 --> 00:03:30,184 and in that little circle in the very center is the Earth 74 00:03:30,208 --> 00:03:33,184 and the Sun and almost everything that you know and love. 75 00:03:33,208 --> 00:03:35,018 And those yellow circles at the edge 76 00:03:35,042 --> 00:03:37,809 are these icy bodies out beyond the planets. 77 00:03:37,833 --> 00:03:40,101 These icy bodies are pushed and pulled 78 00:03:40,125 --> 00:03:42,268 by the gravitational fields of the planets 79 00:03:42,292 --> 00:03:44,809 in entirely predictable ways. 80 00:03:44,833 --> 00:03:49,542 Everything goes around the Sun exactly the way it is supposed to. 81 00:03:50,958 --> 00:03:52,226 Almost. 82 00:03:52,250 --> 00:03:54,309 So in 2003, 83 00:03:54,333 --> 00:03:56,226 I discovered what was at the time 84 00:03:56,250 --> 00:03:59,934 the most distant known object in the entire solar system. 85 00:03:59,958 --> 00:04:02,434 It's hard not to look at that lonely body out there 86 00:04:02,458 --> 00:04:04,518 and say, oh yeah, sure, so Lowell was wrong, 87 00:04:04,542 --> 00:04:06,476 there was no planet just beyond Neptune, 88 00:04:06,500 --> 00:04:09,059 but this, this could be a new planet. 89 00:04:09,083 --> 00:04:10,559 The real question we had was, 90 00:04:10,583 --> 00:04:12,893 what kind of orbit does it have around the Sun? 91 00:04:12,917 --> 00:04:14,851 Does it go in a circle around the Sun 92 00:04:14,875 --> 00:04:16,434 like a planet should? 93 00:04:16,458 --> 00:04:20,351 Or is it just a typical member of this icy belt of bodies 94 00:04:20,375 --> 00:04:24,434 that got a little bit tossed outward and it's now on its way back in? 95 00:04:24,458 --> 00:04:26,976 This is precisely the question 96 00:04:27,000 --> 00:04:31,601 the astronomers were trying to answer about Uranus 200 years ago. 97 00:04:31,625 --> 00:04:35,393 They did it by using overlooked observations of Uranus 98 00:04:35,417 --> 00:04:37,768 from 91 years before its discovery 99 00:04:37,792 --> 00:04:39,518 to figure out its entire orbit. 100 00:04:39,542 --> 00:04:41,559 We couldn't go quite that far back, 101 00:04:41,583 --> 00:04:46,184 but we did find observations of our object from 13 years earlier 102 00:04:46,208 --> 00:04:48,893 that allowed us to figure out how it went around the Sun. 103 00:04:48,917 --> 00:04:50,184 So the question is, 104 00:04:50,208 --> 00:04:52,934 is it in a circular orbit around the Sun, like a planet, 105 00:04:52,958 --> 00:04:54,351 or is it on its way back in, 106 00:04:54,375 --> 00:04:56,268 like one of these typical icy bodies? 107 00:04:56,292 --> 00:04:57,976 And the answer is 108 00:04:58,000 --> 00:04:59,268 no. 109 00:04:59,292 --> 00:05:02,059 It has a massively elongated orbit 110 00:05:02,083 --> 00:05:06,018 that takes 10,000 years to go around the Sun. 111 00:05:06,042 --> 00:05:08,059 We named this object Sedna 112 00:05:08,083 --> 00:05:09,934 after the Inuit goddess of the sea, 113 00:05:09,958 --> 00:05:14,018 in honor of the cold, icy places where it spends all of its time. 114 00:05:14,042 --> 00:05:15,643 We now know that Sedna, 115 00:05:15,667 --> 00:05:17,434 it's about a third the size of Pluto 116 00:05:17,458 --> 00:05:19,518 and it's a relatively typical member 117 00:05:19,542 --> 00:05:22,351 of those icy bodies out beyond Neptune. 118 00:05:22,375 --> 00:05:26,226 Relatively typical, except for this bizarre orbit. 119 00:05:26,250 --> 00:05:28,018 You might look at this orbit and say, 120 00:05:28,042 --> 00:05:30,768 "Yeah, that's bizarre, 10,000 years to go around the Sun," 121 00:05:30,792 --> 00:05:32,726 but that's not really the bizarre part. 122 00:05:32,750 --> 00:05:34,941 The bizarre part is that in those 10,000 years, 123 00:05:34,965 --> 00:05:38,934 Sedna never comes close to anything else in the solar system. 124 00:05:38,958 --> 00:05:41,268 Even at its closest approach to the Sun, 125 00:05:41,292 --> 00:05:43,601 Sedna is further from Neptune 126 00:05:43,625 --> 00:05:45,833 than Neptune is from the Earth. 127 00:05:47,042 --> 00:05:49,184 If Sedna had had an orbit like this, 128 00:05:49,208 --> 00:05:51,809 that kisses the orbit of Neptune once around the Sun, 129 00:05:51,833 --> 00:05:54,851 that would have actually been really easy to explain. 130 00:05:54,875 --> 00:05:56,643 That would have just been an object 131 00:05:56,667 --> 00:05:58,934 that had been in a circular orbit around the Sun 132 00:05:58,958 --> 00:06:00,393 in that region of icy bodies, 133 00:06:00,417 --> 00:06:02,941 had gotten a little bit too close to Neptune one time, 134 00:06:02,965 --> 00:06:05,799 and then got slingshot out and is now on its way back in. 135 00:06:07,333 --> 00:06:12,059 But Sedna never comes close to anything known in the solar system 136 00:06:12,083 --> 00:06:14,476 that could have given it that slingshot. 137 00:06:14,500 --> 00:06:16,518 Neptune can't be responsible, 138 00:06:16,542 --> 00:06:19,643 but something had to be responsible. 139 00:06:19,667 --> 00:06:22,601 This was the first time since 1845 140 00:06:22,625 --> 00:06:27,559 that we saw the gravitational effects of something in the outer solar system 141 00:06:27,583 --> 00:06:29,083 and didn't know what it was. 142 00:06:30,208 --> 00:06:33,101 I actually thought I knew what the answer was. 143 00:06:33,125 --> 00:06:37,143 Sure, it could have been some distant, giant planet 144 00:06:37,167 --> 00:06:38,434 in the outer solar system, 145 00:06:38,458 --> 00:06:40,809 but by this time, that idea was so ridiculous 146 00:06:40,833 --> 00:06:42,684 and had been so thoroughly discredited 147 00:06:42,708 --> 00:06:44,518 that I didn't take it very seriously. 148 00:06:44,542 --> 00:06:45,809 But 4.5 billion years ago, 149 00:06:45,833 --> 00:06:50,684 when the Sun formed in a cocoon of hundreds of other stars, 150 00:06:50,708 --> 00:06:51,976 any one of those stars 151 00:06:52,000 --> 00:06:54,643 could have gotten just a little bit too close to Sedna 152 00:06:54,667 --> 00:06:58,643 and perturbed it onto the orbit that it has today. 153 00:06:58,667 --> 00:07:02,559 When that cluster of stars dissipated into the galaxy, 154 00:07:02,583 --> 00:07:06,351 the orbit of Sedna would have been left as a fossil record 155 00:07:06,375 --> 00:07:08,851 of this earliest history of the Sun. 156 00:07:08,875 --> 00:07:10,684 I was so excited by this idea, 157 00:07:10,708 --> 00:07:12,184 by the idea that we could look 158 00:07:12,208 --> 00:07:14,434 at the fossil history of the birth of the Sun, 159 00:07:14,458 --> 00:07:16,059 that I spent the next decade 160 00:07:16,083 --> 00:07:18,809 looking for more objects with orbits like Sedna. 161 00:07:18,833 --> 00:07:22,268 In that ten-year period, I found zero. 162 00:07:22,292 --> 00:07:23,309 (Laughter) 163 00:07:23,333 --> 00:07:26,851 But my colleagues, Chad Trujillo and Scott Sheppard, did a better job, 164 00:07:26,875 --> 00:07:29,893 and they have now found several objects with orbits like Sedna, 165 00:07:29,917 --> 00:07:31,684 which is super exciting. 166 00:07:31,708 --> 00:07:33,232 But what's even more interesting 167 00:07:33,256 --> 00:07:36,018 is that they found that all these objects 168 00:07:36,042 --> 00:07:39,934 are not only on these distant, elongated orbits, 169 00:07:39,958 --> 00:07:45,309 they also share a common value of this obscure orbital parameter 170 00:07:45,333 --> 00:07:49,292 that in celestial mechanics we call argument of perihelion. 171 00:07:50,250 --> 00:07:53,184 When they realized it was clustered in argument of perihelion, 172 00:07:53,208 --> 00:07:54,976 they immediately jumped up and down, 173 00:07:55,000 --> 00:07:57,976 saying it must be caused by a distant, giant planet out there, 174 00:07:58,000 --> 00:08:01,059 which is really exciting, except it makes no sense at all. 175 00:08:01,083 --> 00:08:03,601 Let me try to explain it to you why with an analogy. 176 00:08:03,625 --> 00:08:06,934 Imagine a person walking down a plaza 177 00:08:06,958 --> 00:08:10,292 and looking 45 degrees to his right side. 178 00:08:11,125 --> 00:08:13,184 There's a lot of reasons that might happen, 179 00:08:13,208 --> 00:08:15,143 it's super easy to explain, no big deal. 180 00:08:15,167 --> 00:08:16,976 Imagine now many different people, 181 00:08:17,000 --> 00:08:20,893 all walking in different directions across the plaza, 182 00:08:20,917 --> 00:08:24,184 but all looking 45 degrees to the direction that they're moving. 183 00:08:24,208 --> 00:08:26,226 Everybody's moving in different directions, 184 00:08:26,250 --> 00:08:28,393 everybody's looking in different directions, 185 00:08:28,417 --> 00:08:31,726 but they're all looking 45 degrees to the direction of motion. 186 00:08:31,750 --> 00:08:33,583 What could cause something like that? 187 00:08:34,917 --> 00:08:36,184 I have no idea. 188 00:08:36,208 --> 00:08:39,934 It's very difficult to think of any reason that that would happen. 189 00:08:39,958 --> 00:08:41,309 (Laughter) 190 00:08:41,333 --> 00:08:44,184 And this is essentially what that clustering 191 00:08:44,208 --> 00:08:47,601 in argument of perihelion was telling us. 192 00:08:47,625 --> 00:08:51,184 Scientists were generally baffled and they assumed it must just be a fluke 193 00:08:51,208 --> 00:08:52,559 and some bad observations. 194 00:08:52,583 --> 00:08:54,351 They told the astronomers, 195 00:08:54,375 --> 00:08:56,768 "Do better measurements." 196 00:08:56,792 --> 00:08:59,893 I actually took a very careful look at those measurements, though, 197 00:08:59,917 --> 00:09:01,184 and they were right. 198 00:09:01,208 --> 00:09:03,101 These objects really did all share 199 00:09:03,125 --> 00:09:05,601 a common value of argument of perihelion, 200 00:09:05,625 --> 00:09:07,018 and they shouldn't. 201 00:09:07,042 --> 00:09:09,250 Something had to be causing that. 202 00:09:11,125 --> 00:09:15,434 The final piece of the puzzle came into place in 2016, 203 00:09:15,458 --> 00:09:17,976 when my colleague, Konstantin Batygin, 204 00:09:18,000 --> 00:09:20,643 who works three doors down from me, and I 205 00:09:20,667 --> 00:09:23,268 realized that the reason that everybody was baffled 206 00:09:23,292 --> 00:09:28,018 was because argument of perihelion was only part of the story. 207 00:09:28,042 --> 00:09:30,101 If you look at these objects the right way, 208 00:09:30,125 --> 00:09:34,184 they are all actually lined up in space in the same direction, 209 00:09:34,208 --> 00:09:37,934 and they're all tilted in space in the same direction. 210 00:09:37,958 --> 00:09:42,309 It's as if all those people on the plaza are all walking in the same direction 211 00:09:42,333 --> 00:09:45,768 and they're all looking 45 degrees to the right side. 212 00:09:45,792 --> 00:09:47,059 That's easy to explain. 213 00:09:47,083 --> 00:09:49,559 They're all looking at something. 214 00:09:49,583 --> 00:09:53,708 These objects in the outer solar system are all reacting to something. 215 00:09:55,000 --> 00:09:56,726 But what? 216 00:09:56,750 --> 00:09:59,726 Konstantin and I spent a year 217 00:09:59,750 --> 00:10:04,559 trying to come up with any explanation other than a distant, giant planet 218 00:10:04,583 --> 00:10:05,851 in the outer solar system. 219 00:10:05,875 --> 00:10:11,309 We did not want to be the 33rd and 34th people in history to propose this planet 220 00:10:11,333 --> 00:10:13,667 to yet again be told we were wrong. 221 00:10:14,792 --> 00:10:16,559 But after a year, 222 00:10:16,583 --> 00:10:17,893 there was really no choice. 223 00:10:17,917 --> 00:10:20,059 We could come up with no other explanation 224 00:10:20,083 --> 00:10:22,583 other than that there is a distant, 225 00:10:22,625 --> 00:10:25,893 massive planet on an elongated orbit, 226 00:10:25,917 --> 00:10:27,976 inclined to the rest of the solar system, 227 00:10:28,000 --> 00:10:30,726 that is forcing these patterns for these objects 228 00:10:30,750 --> 00:10:32,768 in the outer solar system. 229 00:10:32,792 --> 00:10:34,934 Guess what else a planet like this does. 230 00:10:34,958 --> 00:10:36,809 Remember that strange orbit of Sedna, 231 00:10:36,833 --> 00:10:39,768 how it was kind of pulled away from the Sun in one direction? 232 00:10:39,792 --> 00:10:43,518 A planet like this would make orbits like that all day long. 233 00:10:43,542 --> 00:10:45,851 We knew we were onto something. 234 00:10:45,875 --> 00:10:48,851 So this brings us to today. 235 00:10:48,875 --> 00:10:53,059 We are basically 1845, Paris. 236 00:10:53,083 --> 00:10:54,268 (Laughter) 237 00:10:54,292 --> 00:10:59,601 We see the gravitational effects of a distant, giant planet, 238 00:10:59,625 --> 00:11:01,851 and we are trying to work out the calculations 239 00:11:01,875 --> 00:11:04,893 to tell us where to look, to point our telescopes, 240 00:11:04,917 --> 00:11:06,184 to find this planet. 241 00:11:06,208 --> 00:11:08,583 We've done massive suites of computer simulations, 242 00:11:09,292 --> 00:11:11,226 massive months of analytic calculations 243 00:11:11,250 --> 00:11:13,809 and here's what I can tell you so far. 244 00:11:13,833 --> 00:11:17,018 First, this planet, which we call Planet Nine, 245 00:11:17,042 --> 00:11:19,625 because that's what it is, 246 00:11:20,750 --> 00:11:24,018 Planet Nine is six times the mass of the Earth. 247 00:11:24,042 --> 00:11:26,268 This is no slightly-smaller-than-Pluto, 248 00:11:26,292 --> 00:11:29,018 let's-all-argue-about- whether-it's-a-planet-or-not thing. 249 00:11:29,042 --> 00:11:32,351 This is the fifth largest planet in our entire solar system. 250 00:11:32,375 --> 00:11:36,018 For context, let me show you the sizes of the planets. 251 00:11:36,042 --> 00:11:40,184 In the back there, you can the massive Jupiter and Saturn. 252 00:11:40,208 --> 00:11:42,851 Next to them, a little bit smaller, Uranus and Neptune. 253 00:11:42,875 --> 00:11:46,352 Up in the corner, the terrestrial planets, Mercury, Venus, Earth and Mars. 254 00:11:46,376 --> 00:11:47,726 You can even see that belt 255 00:11:47,750 --> 00:11:50,893 of icy bodies beyond Neptune, of which Pluto is a member, 256 00:11:50,917 --> 00:11:52,775 good luck figuring out which one it is. 257 00:11:52,799 --> 00:11:55,215 And here is Planet Nine. 258 00:11:56,583 --> 00:11:59,018 Planet Nine is big. 259 00:11:59,042 --> 00:12:00,309 Planet Nine is so big, 260 00:12:00,333 --> 00:12:02,934 you should probably wonder why haven't we found it yet. 261 00:12:02,958 --> 00:12:04,226 Well, Planet Nine is big, 262 00:12:04,250 --> 00:12:06,351 but it's also really, really far away. 263 00:12:06,375 --> 00:12:11,059 It's something like 15 times further away than Neptune. 264 00:12:11,083 --> 00:12:14,351 And that makes it about 50,000 times fainter than Neptune. 265 00:12:14,375 --> 00:12:17,309 And also, the sky is a really big place. 266 00:12:17,333 --> 00:12:19,476 We've narrowed down where we think it is 267 00:12:19,500 --> 00:12:22,018 to a relatively small area of the sky, 268 00:12:22,042 --> 00:12:23,934 but it would still take us years 269 00:12:23,958 --> 00:12:26,309 to systematically cover the area of the sky 270 00:12:26,333 --> 00:12:28,184 with the large telescopes that we need 271 00:12:28,208 --> 00:12:31,518 to see something that's this far away and this faint. 272 00:12:31,542 --> 00:12:34,684 Luckily, we might not have to. 273 00:12:34,708 --> 00:12:39,601 Just like Bouvard used unrecognized observations of Uranus 274 00:12:39,625 --> 00:12:42,393 from 91 years before its discovery, 275 00:12:42,417 --> 00:12:46,184 I bet that there are unrecognized images 276 00:12:46,208 --> 00:12:49,083 that show the location of Planet Nine. 277 00:12:50,000 --> 00:12:53,059 It's going to be a massive computational undertaking 278 00:12:53,083 --> 00:12:55,393 to go through all of the old data 279 00:12:55,417 --> 00:12:58,333 and pick out that one faint moving planet. 280 00:12:59,292 --> 00:13:00,643 But we're underway. 281 00:13:00,667 --> 00:13:02,976 And I think we're getting close. 282 00:13:03,000 --> 00:13:05,518 So I would say, get ready. 283 00:13:05,542 --> 00:13:09,518 We are not going to match Le Verrier's 284 00:13:09,542 --> 00:13:10,809 "make a prediction, 285 00:13:10,833 --> 00:13:12,726 have the planet found in a single night 286 00:13:12,750 --> 00:13:14,934 that close to where you predicted it" record. 287 00:13:14,958 --> 00:13:18,893 But I do bet that within the next couple of years 288 00:13:18,917 --> 00:13:21,309 some astronomer somewhere 289 00:13:21,333 --> 00:13:23,559 will find a faint point of light, 290 00:13:23,583 --> 00:13:25,851 slowly moving across the sky 291 00:13:25,875 --> 00:13:29,184 and triumphantly announce the discovery of a new, 292 00:13:29,208 --> 00:13:31,643 and quite possibly not the last, 293 00:13:31,667 --> 00:13:34,143 real planet of our solar system. 294 00:13:34,167 --> 00:13:35,434 Thank you. 295 00:13:35,458 --> 00:13:39,083 (Applause)