WEBVTT

00:00:01.000 --> 00:00:03.792
I'm going to tell you a story
from 200 years ago.

00:00:04.792 --> 00:00:08.059
In 1820, French astronomer Alexis Bouvard

00:00:08.083 --> 00:00:13.309
almost became the second person
in human history to discover a planet.

00:00:13.333 --> 00:00:16.643
He'd been tracking the position
of Uranus across the night sky

00:00:16.667 --> 00:00:18.393
using old star catalogs,

00:00:18.417 --> 00:00:20.726
and it didn't quite go around the Sun

00:00:20.750 --> 00:00:23.184
the way that his predictions
said it should.

00:00:23.208 --> 00:00:25.309
Sometimes it was a little too fast,

00:00:25.333 --> 00:00:27.018
sometimes a little too slow.

00:00:27.042 --> 00:00:30.768
Bouvard knew that
his predictions were perfect.

00:00:30.792 --> 00:00:34.059
So it had to be that those
old star catalogs were bad.

00:00:34.083 --> 00:00:36.143
He told astronomers of the day,

00:00:36.167 --> 00:00:38.601
"Do better measurements."

00:00:38.625 --> 00:00:39.893
So they did.

00:00:39.917 --> 00:00:42.059
Astronomers spent the next two decades

00:00:42.083 --> 00:00:46.143
meticulously tracking the position
of Uranus across the sky,

00:00:46.167 --> 00:00:49.851
but it still didn't fit
Bouvard's predictions.

NOTE Paragraph

00:00:49.875 --> 00:00:52.018
By 1840, it had become obvious.

00:00:52.042 --> 00:00:55.101
The problem was not
with those old star catalogs,

00:00:55.125 --> 00:00:57.976
the problem was with the predictions.

00:00:58.000 --> 00:00:59.518
And astronomers knew why.

00:00:59.542 --> 00:01:03.726
They realized that there must be
a distant, giant planet

00:01:03.750 --> 00:01:05.434
just beyond the orbit of Uranus

00:01:05.458 --> 00:01:07.268
that was tugging along at that orbit,

00:01:07.292 --> 00:01:09.851
sometimes pulling it along a bit too fast,

00:01:09.875 --> 00:01:11.542
sometimes holding it back.

NOTE Paragraph

00:01:12.750 --> 00:01:14.768
Must have been frustrating back in 1840

00:01:14.792 --> 00:01:18.184
to see these gravitational effects
of this distant, giant planet

00:01:18.208 --> 00:01:21.976
but not yet know how to actually find it.

00:01:22.000 --> 00:01:24.059
Trust me, it's really frustrating.

NOTE Paragraph

00:01:24.083 --> 00:01:25.559
(Laughter)

NOTE Paragraph

00:01:25.583 --> 00:01:27.809
But in 1846, another French astronomer,

00:01:27.833 --> 00:01:29.143
Urbain Le Verrier,

00:01:29.167 --> 00:01:30.434
worked through the math

00:01:30.458 --> 00:01:33.184
and figured out how to predict
the location of the planet.

00:01:33.208 --> 00:01:36.184
He sent his prediction
to the Berlin observatory,

00:01:36.208 --> 00:01:37.643
they opened up their telescope

00:01:37.667 --> 00:01:40.726
and in the very first night
they found this faint point of light

00:01:40.750 --> 00:01:42.851
slowly moving across the sky

00:01:42.875 --> 00:01:44.143
and discovered Neptune.

00:01:44.167 --> 00:01:48.292
It was this close on the sky
to Le Verrier's predicted location.

NOTE Paragraph

00:01:49.875 --> 00:01:54.393
The story of prediction
and discrepancy and new theory

00:01:54.417 --> 00:01:57.476
and triumphant discoveries is so classic

00:01:57.500 --> 00:02:00.393
and Le Verrier became so famous from it,

00:02:00.417 --> 00:02:03.143
that people tried to get in
on the act right away.

00:02:03.167 --> 00:02:05.684
In the last 163 years,

00:02:05.708 --> 00:02:11.309
dozens of astronomers have used
some sort of alleged orbital discrepancy

00:02:11.333 --> 00:02:15.250
to predict the existence
of some new planet in the solar system.

NOTE Paragraph

00:02:16.292 --> 00:02:19.000
They have always been wrong.

NOTE Paragraph

00:02:20.125 --> 00:02:22.309
The most famous
of these erroneous predictions

00:02:22.333 --> 00:02:23.768
came from Percival Lowell,

00:02:23.792 --> 00:02:28.518
who was convinced that there must be
a planet just beyond Uranus and Neptune,

00:02:28.542 --> 00:02:30.518
messing with those orbits.

00:02:30.542 --> 00:02:33.101
And so when Pluto was discovered in 1930

00:02:33.125 --> 00:02:34.768
at the Lowell Observatory,

00:02:34.792 --> 00:02:39.226
everybody assumed that it must be
the planet that Lowell had predicted.

00:02:39.250 --> 00:02:41.643
They were wrong.

00:02:41.667 --> 00:02:45.768
It turns out, Uranus and Neptune
are exactly where they're supposed to be.

00:02:45.792 --> 00:02:47.351
It took 100 years,

00:02:47.375 --> 00:02:49.143
but Bouvard was eventually right.

00:02:49.167 --> 00:02:52.768
Astronomers needed to do
better measurements.

00:02:52.792 --> 00:02:54.559
And when they did,

00:02:54.583 --> 00:02:57.768
those better measurements
had turned out that

00:02:57.792 --> 00:03:02.809
there is no planet just beyond
the orbit of Uranus and Neptune

00:03:02.833 --> 00:03:05.518
and Pluto is thousands of times too small

00:03:05.542 --> 00:03:08.184
to have any effect on those orbits at all.

NOTE Paragraph

00:03:08.208 --> 00:03:11.851
So even though Pluto
turned out not to be the planet

00:03:11.875 --> 00:03:13.476
it was originally thought to be,

00:03:13.500 --> 00:03:16.934
it was the first discovery
of what is now known to be

00:03:16.958 --> 00:03:21.684
thousands of tiny, icy objects
in orbit beyond the planets.

00:03:21.708 --> 00:03:24.601
Here you can see the orbits of Jupiter,

00:03:24.625 --> 00:03:27.143
Saturn, Uranus and Neptune,

00:03:27.167 --> 00:03:30.184
and in that little circle
in the very center is the Earth

00:03:30.208 --> 00:03:33.184
and the Sun and almost everything
that you know and love.

00:03:33.208 --> 00:03:35.018
And those yellow circles at the edge

00:03:35.042 --> 00:03:37.809
are these icy bodies
out beyond the planets.

00:03:37.833 --> 00:03:40.101
These icy bodies are pushed and pulled

00:03:40.125 --> 00:03:42.268
by the gravitational fields of the planets

00:03:42.292 --> 00:03:44.809
in entirely predictable ways.

00:03:44.833 --> 00:03:49.542
Everything goes around the Sun
exactly the way it is supposed to.

NOTE Paragraph

00:03:50.958 --> 00:03:52.226
Almost.

NOTE Paragraph

00:03:52.250 --> 00:03:54.309
So in 2003,

00:03:54.333 --> 00:03:56.226
I discovered what was at the time

00:03:56.250 --> 00:03:59.934
the most distant known object
in the entire solar system.

00:03:59.958 --> 00:04:02.434
It's hard not to look
at that lonely body out there

00:04:02.458 --> 00:04:04.518
and say, oh yeah, sure,
so Lowell was wrong,

00:04:04.542 --> 00:04:06.476
there was no planet just beyond Neptune,

00:04:06.500 --> 00:04:09.059
but this, this could be a new planet.

00:04:09.083 --> 00:04:10.559
The real question we had was,

00:04:10.583 --> 00:04:12.893
what kind of orbit
does it have around the Sun?

00:04:12.917 --> 00:04:14.851
Does it go in a circle around the Sun

00:04:14.875 --> 00:04:16.434
like a planet should?

00:04:16.458 --> 00:04:20.351
Or is it just a typical member
of this icy belt of bodies

00:04:20.375 --> 00:04:24.434
that got a little bit tossed outward
and it's now on its way back in?

NOTE Paragraph

00:04:24.458 --> 00:04:26.976
This is precisely the question

00:04:27.000 --> 00:04:31.601
the astronomers were trying
to answer about Uranus 200 years ago.

00:04:31.625 --> 00:04:35.393
They did it by using
overlooked observations of Uranus

00:04:35.417 --> 00:04:37.768
from 91 years before its discovery

00:04:37.792 --> 00:04:39.518
to figure out its entire orbit.

00:04:39.542 --> 00:04:41.559
We couldn't go quite that far back,

00:04:41.583 --> 00:04:46.184
but we did find observations
of our object from 13 years earlier

00:04:46.208 --> 00:04:48.893
that allowed us to figure out
how it went around the Sun.

NOTE Paragraph

00:04:48.917 --> 00:04:50.184
So the question is,

00:04:50.208 --> 00:04:52.934
is it in a circular orbit
around the Sun, like a planet,

00:04:52.958 --> 00:04:54.351
or is it on its way back in,

00:04:54.375 --> 00:04:56.268
like one of these typical icy bodies?

00:04:56.292 --> 00:04:57.976
And the answer is

00:04:58.000 --> 00:04:59.268
no.

NOTE Paragraph

00:04:59.292 --> 00:05:02.059
It has a massively elongated orbit

00:05:02.083 --> 00:05:06.018
that takes 10,000 years
to go around the Sun.

00:05:06.042 --> 00:05:08.059
We named this object Sedna

00:05:08.083 --> 00:05:09.934
after the Inuit goddess of the sea,

00:05:09.958 --> 00:05:14.018
in honor of the cold, icy places
where it spends all of its time.

00:05:14.042 --> 00:05:15.643
We now know that Sedna,

00:05:15.667 --> 00:05:17.434
it's about a third the size of Pluto

00:05:17.458 --> 00:05:19.518
and it's a relatively typical member

00:05:19.542 --> 00:05:22.351
of those icy bodies out beyond Neptune.

00:05:22.375 --> 00:05:26.226
Relatively typical,
except for this bizarre orbit.

00:05:26.250 --> 00:05:28.018
You might look at this orbit and say,

00:05:28.042 --> 00:05:30.768
"Yeah, that's bizarre,
10,000 years to go around the Sun,"

00:05:30.792 --> 00:05:32.726
but that's not really the bizarre part.

00:05:32.750 --> 00:05:34.941
The bizarre part is
that in those 10,000 years,

00:05:34.965 --> 00:05:38.934
Sedna never comes close
to anything else in the solar system.

00:05:38.958 --> 00:05:41.268
Even at its closest approach to the Sun,

00:05:41.292 --> 00:05:43.601
Sedna is further from Neptune

00:05:43.625 --> 00:05:45.833
than Neptune is from the Earth.

NOTE Paragraph

00:05:47.042 --> 00:05:49.184
If Sedna had had an orbit like this,

00:05:49.208 --> 00:05:51.809
that kisses the orbit of Neptune
once around the Sun,

00:05:51.833 --> 00:05:54.851
that would have actually been
really easy to explain.

00:05:54.875 --> 00:05:56.643
That would have just been an object

00:05:56.667 --> 00:05:58.934
that had been in
a circular orbit around the Sun

00:05:58.958 --> 00:06:00.393
in that region of icy bodies,

00:06:00.417 --> 00:06:02.941
had gotten a little bit
too close to Neptune one time,

00:06:02.965 --> 00:06:05.799
and then got slingshot out
and is now on its way back in.

NOTE Paragraph

00:06:07.333 --> 00:06:12.059
But Sedna never comes close
to anything known in the solar system

00:06:12.083 --> 00:06:14.476
that could have given it that slingshot.

00:06:14.500 --> 00:06:16.518
Neptune can't be responsible,

00:06:16.542 --> 00:06:19.643
but something had to be responsible.

00:06:19.667 --> 00:06:22.601
This was the first time since 1845

00:06:22.625 --> 00:06:27.559
that we saw the gravitational effects
of something in the outer solar system

00:06:27.583 --> 00:06:29.083
and didn't know what it was.

NOTE Paragraph

00:06:30.208 --> 00:06:33.101
I actually thought I knew
what the answer was.

00:06:33.125 --> 00:06:37.143
Sure, it could have been
some distant, giant planet

00:06:37.167 --> 00:06:38.434
in the outer solar system,

00:06:38.458 --> 00:06:40.809
but by this time,
that idea was so ridiculous

00:06:40.833 --> 00:06:42.684
and had been so thoroughly discredited

00:06:42.708 --> 00:06:44.518
that I didn't take it very seriously.

00:06:44.542 --> 00:06:45.809
But 4.5 billion years ago,

00:06:45.833 --> 00:06:50.684
when the Sun formed in a cocoon
of hundreds of other stars,

00:06:50.708 --> 00:06:51.976
any one of those stars

00:06:52.000 --> 00:06:54.643
could have gotten
just a little bit too close to Sedna

00:06:54.667 --> 00:06:58.643
and perturbed it onto the orbit
that it has today.

00:06:58.667 --> 00:07:02.559
When that cluster of stars
dissipated into the galaxy,

00:07:02.583 --> 00:07:06.351
the orbit of Sedna would have been
left as a fossil record

00:07:06.375 --> 00:07:08.851
of this earliest history of the Sun.

NOTE Paragraph

00:07:08.875 --> 00:07:10.684
I was so excited by this idea,

00:07:10.708 --> 00:07:12.184
by the idea that we could look

00:07:12.208 --> 00:07:14.434
at the fossil history
of the birth of the Sun,

00:07:14.458 --> 00:07:16.059
that I spent the next decade

00:07:16.083 --> 00:07:18.809
looking for more objects
with orbits like Sedna.

00:07:18.833 --> 00:07:22.268
In that ten-year period, I found zero.

NOTE Paragraph

00:07:22.292 --> 00:07:23.309
(Laughter)

NOTE Paragraph

00:07:23.333 --> 00:07:26.851
But my colleagues, Chad Trujillo
and Scott Sheppard, did a better job,

00:07:26.875 --> 00:07:29.893
and they have now found several objects
with orbits like Sedna,

00:07:29.917 --> 00:07:31.684
which is super exciting.

NOTE Paragraph

00:07:31.708 --> 00:07:33.232
But what's even more interesting

00:07:33.256 --> 00:07:36.018
is that they found that all these objects

00:07:36.042 --> 00:07:39.934
are not only on these distant,
elongated orbits,

00:07:39.958 --> 00:07:45.309
they also share a common value
of this obscure orbital parameter

00:07:45.333 --> 00:07:49.292
that in celestial mechanics we call
argument of perihelion.

00:07:50.250 --> 00:07:53.184
When they realized it was clustered
in argument of perihelion,

00:07:53.208 --> 00:07:54.976
they immediately jumped up and down,

00:07:55.000 --> 00:07:57.976
saying it must be caused
by a distant, giant planet out there,

00:07:58.000 --> 00:08:01.059
which is really exciting,
except it makes no sense at all.

NOTE Paragraph

00:08:01.083 --> 00:08:03.601
Let me try to explain it
to you why with an analogy.

00:08:03.625 --> 00:08:06.934
Imagine a person walking down a plaza

00:08:06.958 --> 00:08:10.292
and looking 45 degrees to his right side.

00:08:11.125 --> 00:08:13.184
There's a lot of reasons
that might happen,

00:08:13.208 --> 00:08:15.143
it's super easy to explain, no big deal.

00:08:15.167 --> 00:08:16.976
Imagine now many different people,

00:08:17.000 --> 00:08:20.893
all walking in different
directions across the plaza,

00:08:20.917 --> 00:08:24.184
but all looking 45 degrees
to the direction that they're moving.

00:08:24.208 --> 00:08:26.226
Everybody's moving
in different directions,

00:08:26.250 --> 00:08:28.393
everybody's looking
in different directions,

00:08:28.417 --> 00:08:31.726
but they're all looking 45 degrees
to the direction of motion.

00:08:31.750 --> 00:08:33.583
What could cause something like that?

00:08:34.917 --> 00:08:36.184
I have no idea.

00:08:36.208 --> 00:08:39.934
It's very difficult to think of any reason
that that would happen.

NOTE Paragraph

00:08:39.958 --> 00:08:41.309
(Laughter)

NOTE Paragraph

00:08:41.333 --> 00:08:44.184
And this is essentially
what that clustering

00:08:44.208 --> 00:08:47.601
in argument of perihelion was telling us.

NOTE Paragraph

00:08:47.625 --> 00:08:51.184
Scientists were generally baffled
and they assumed it must just be a fluke

00:08:51.208 --> 00:08:52.559
and some bad observations.

00:08:52.583 --> 00:08:54.351
They told the astronomers,

00:08:54.375 --> 00:08:56.768
"Do better measurements."

00:08:56.792 --> 00:08:59.893
I actually took a very careful look
at those measurements, though,

00:08:59.917 --> 00:09:01.184
and they were right.

00:09:01.208 --> 00:09:03.101
These objects really did all share

00:09:03.125 --> 00:09:05.601
a common value of argument of perihelion,

00:09:05.625 --> 00:09:07.018
and they shouldn't.

00:09:07.042 --> 00:09:09.250
Something had to be causing that.

NOTE Paragraph

00:09:11.125 --> 00:09:15.434
The final piece of the puzzle
came into place in 2016,

00:09:15.458 --> 00:09:17.976
when my colleague, Konstantin Batygin,

00:09:18.000 --> 00:09:20.643
who works three doors down from me, and I

00:09:20.667 --> 00:09:23.268
realized that the reason
that everybody was baffled

00:09:23.292 --> 00:09:28.018
was because argument of perihelion
was only part of the story.

00:09:28.042 --> 00:09:30.101
If you look at these
objects the right way,

00:09:30.125 --> 00:09:34.184
they are all actually lined up
in space in the same direction,

00:09:34.208 --> 00:09:37.934
and they're all tilted in space
in the same direction.

00:09:37.958 --> 00:09:42.309
It's as if all those people on the plaza
are all walking in the same direction

00:09:42.333 --> 00:09:45.768
and they're all looking
45 degrees to the right side.

00:09:45.792 --> 00:09:47.059
That's easy to explain.

00:09:47.083 --> 00:09:49.559
They're all looking at something.

00:09:49.583 --> 00:09:53.708
These objects in the outer solar system
are all reacting to something.

00:09:55.000 --> 00:09:56.726
But what?

NOTE Paragraph

00:09:56.750 --> 00:09:59.726
Konstantin and I spent a year

00:09:59.750 --> 00:10:04.559
trying to come up with any explanation
other than a distant, giant planet

00:10:04.583 --> 00:10:05.851
in the outer solar system.

00:10:05.875 --> 00:10:11.309
We did not want to be the 33rd and 34th
people in history to propose this planet

00:10:11.333 --> 00:10:13.667
to yet again be told we were wrong.

00:10:14.792 --> 00:10:16.559
But after a year,

00:10:16.583 --> 00:10:17.893
there was really no choice.

00:10:17.917 --> 00:10:20.059
We could come up with no other explanation

00:10:20.083 --> 00:10:22.583
other than that there is a distant,

00:10:22.625 --> 00:10:25.893
massive planet on an elongated orbit,

00:10:25.917 --> 00:10:27.976
inclined to the rest of the solar system,

00:10:28.000 --> 00:10:30.726
that is forcing these patterns
for these objects

00:10:30.750 --> 00:10:32.768
in the outer solar system.

NOTE Paragraph

00:10:32.792 --> 00:10:34.934
Guess what else a planet like this does.

00:10:34.958 --> 00:10:36.809
Remember that strange orbit of Sedna,

00:10:36.833 --> 00:10:39.768
how it was kind of pulled away
from the Sun in one direction?

00:10:39.792 --> 00:10:43.518
A planet like this would make
orbits like that all day long.

00:10:43.542 --> 00:10:45.851
We knew we were onto something.

NOTE Paragraph

00:10:45.875 --> 00:10:48.851
So this brings us to today.

00:10:48.875 --> 00:10:53.059
We are basically 1845, Paris.

NOTE Paragraph

00:10:53.083 --> 00:10:54.268
(Laughter)

NOTE Paragraph

00:10:54.292 --> 00:10:59.601
We see the gravitational effects
of a distant, giant planet,

00:10:59.625 --> 00:11:01.851
and we are trying to work out
the calculations

00:11:01.875 --> 00:11:04.893
to tell us where to look,
to point our telescopes,

00:11:04.917 --> 00:11:06.184
to find this planet.

NOTE Paragraph

00:11:06.208 --> 00:11:08.583
We've done massive suites
of computer simulations,

00:11:09.292 --> 00:11:11.226
massive months of analytic calculations

00:11:11.250 --> 00:11:13.809
and here's what I can tell you so far.

NOTE Paragraph

00:11:13.833 --> 00:11:17.018
First, this planet,
which we call Planet Nine,

00:11:17.042 --> 00:11:19.625
because that's what it is,

00:11:20.750 --> 00:11:24.018
Planet Nine is six times
the mass of the Earth.

00:11:24.042 --> 00:11:26.268
This is no slightly-smaller-than-Pluto,

00:11:26.292 --> 00:11:29.018
let's-all-argue-about-
whether-it's-a-planet-or-not thing.

00:11:29.042 --> 00:11:32.351
This is the fifth largest planet
in our entire solar system.

00:11:32.375 --> 00:11:36.018
For context, let me show you
the sizes of the planets.

00:11:36.042 --> 00:11:40.184
In the back there,
you can the massive Jupiter and Saturn.

00:11:40.208 --> 00:11:42.851
Next to them, a little bit smaller,
Uranus and Neptune.

00:11:42.875 --> 00:11:46.352
Up in the corner, the terrestrial planets,
Mercury, Venus, Earth and Mars.

00:11:46.376 --> 00:11:47.726
You can even see that belt

00:11:47.750 --> 00:11:50.893
of icy bodies beyond Neptune,
of which Pluto is a member,

00:11:50.917 --> 00:11:52.775
good luck figuring out which one it is.

00:11:52.799 --> 00:11:55.215
And here is Planet Nine.

00:11:56.583 --> 00:11:59.018
Planet Nine is big.

00:11:59.042 --> 00:12:00.309
Planet Nine is so big,

00:12:00.333 --> 00:12:02.934
you should probably wonder
why haven't we found it yet.

00:12:02.958 --> 00:12:04.226
Well, Planet Nine is big,

00:12:04.250 --> 00:12:06.351
but it's also really, really far away.

00:12:06.375 --> 00:12:11.059
It's something like
15 times further away than Neptune.

00:12:11.083 --> 00:12:14.351
And that makes it about 50,000 times
fainter than Neptune.

00:12:14.375 --> 00:12:17.309
And also, the sky is a really big place.

00:12:17.333 --> 00:12:19.476
We've narrowed down where we think it is

00:12:19.500 --> 00:12:22.018
to a relatively small area of the sky,

00:12:22.042 --> 00:12:23.934
but it would still take us years

00:12:23.958 --> 00:12:26.309
to systematically cover
the area of the sky

00:12:26.333 --> 00:12:28.184
with the large telescopes that we need

00:12:28.208 --> 00:12:31.518
to see something that's
this far away and this faint.

00:12:31.542 --> 00:12:34.684
Luckily, we might not have to.

NOTE Paragraph

00:12:34.708 --> 00:12:39.601
Just like Bouvard used
unrecognized observations of Uranus

00:12:39.625 --> 00:12:42.393
from 91 years before its discovery,

00:12:42.417 --> 00:12:46.184
I bet that there are unrecognized images

00:12:46.208 --> 00:12:49.083
that show the location of Planet Nine.

00:12:50.000 --> 00:12:53.059
It's going to be a massive
computational undertaking

00:12:53.083 --> 00:12:55.393
to go through all of the old data

00:12:55.417 --> 00:12:58.333
and pick out that one faint moving planet.

00:12:59.292 --> 00:13:00.643
But we're underway.

00:13:00.667 --> 00:13:02.976
And I think we're getting close.

NOTE Paragraph

00:13:03.000 --> 00:13:05.518
So I would say, get ready.

00:13:05.542 --> 00:13:09.518
We are not going to match Le Verrier's

00:13:09.542 --> 00:13:10.809
"make a prediction,

00:13:10.833 --> 00:13:12.726
have the planet found in a single night

00:13:12.750 --> 00:13:14.934
that close to where
you predicted it" record.

00:13:14.958 --> 00:13:18.893
But I do bet that within
the next couple of years

00:13:18.917 --> 00:13:21.309
some astronomer somewhere

00:13:21.333 --> 00:13:23.559
will find a faint point of light,

00:13:23.583 --> 00:13:25.851
slowly moving across the sky

00:13:25.875 --> 00:13:29.184
and triumphantly announce
the discovery of a new,

00:13:29.208 --> 00:13:31.643
and quite possibly not the last,

00:13:31.667 --> 00:13:34.143
real planet of our solar system.

NOTE Paragraph

00:13:34.167 --> 00:13:35.434
Thank you.

NOTE Paragraph

00:13:35.458 --> 00:13:39.083
(Applause)