WEBVTT 00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:03.400 Narrator: Behavioral psychologists have come up with new views, 00:00:03.400 --> 00:00:07.028 not only of animal behavior, but of human nature as well. 00:00:07.638 --> 00:00:12.225 And these views all concern a process that we take for granted: learning. 00:00:12.811 --> 00:00:15.891 Because we are all truly born to learn. 00:00:17.211 --> 00:00:22.019 Ironically, one of the most important figures in the study of learning, Ivan Pavlov, 00:00:22.241 --> 00:00:24.691 wasn't concerned with the subject at all. 00:00:24.691 --> 00:00:26.481 At least, not at first. 00:00:26.481 --> 00:00:29.158 Pavlov, a noted Russian scientist, 00:00:29.158 --> 00:00:34.273 won the Nobel Prize for Physiology and Medicine in 1904. 00:00:34.472 --> 00:00:39.582 As this original footage shows, Pavlov was initially interested in digestion 00:00:39.624 --> 00:00:42.163 and the action of the salivary glands. 00:00:42.833 --> 00:00:47.090 By diverting the saliva of dogs into test tubes, he could precisely measure 00:00:47.090 --> 00:00:51.432 if and how much they salivated during digestion. 00:00:52.685 --> 00:00:56.469 When food was presented, the dog salivated quickly, 00:00:56.469 --> 00:00:59.687 an inherited salivary reflex. 00:01:01.015 --> 00:01:04.064 But over repeated testings, a strange thing happened. 00:01:04.064 --> 00:01:08.380 The dog salivated before contact with the food. 00:01:08.380 --> 00:01:12.168 Just the sight of the food was enough to stimulate their drooling. 00:01:12.638 --> 00:01:19.466 Then, just seeing the food dish, or even hearing the footsteps of Pavlov or his assistants, 00:01:19.466 --> 00:01:23.407 was enough to trigger this built-in reflex. 00:01:23.747 --> 00:01:26.467 What was going on to elicit this response? 00:01:26.467 --> 00:01:30.679 Pavlov decided to find out, by systematically varying the stimuli 00:01:30.679 --> 00:01:32.799 and measuring the dogs' reaction. 00:01:33.359 --> 00:01:35.869 [Metronome clicking] 00:01:35.869 --> 00:01:39.430 Metronomes, lights, and bells were all used as stimuli, 00:01:39.430 --> 00:01:42.240 and they all worked as stand-ins for the food. 00:01:42.770 --> 00:01:46.143 What mattered was not the kind of stimulus that was used, 00:01:46.143 --> 00:01:51.022 but the fact that it reliably signaled that food was on the way. 00:01:51.171 --> 00:01:52.371 ♫ Electronic Music ♫ 00:01:52.571 --> 00:01:57.770 Pavlov had discovered a fundamental type of learning called "Classical Conditioning." 00:01:57.770 --> 00:02:01.592 An original stimulus elicits an automatic unlearned response. 00:02:02.336 --> 00:02:07.086 Both stimulus and response happen naturally. They are unconditioned. 00:02:08.801 --> 00:02:13.604 Then a second, neutral stimulus, that never elicits the unconditional response by itself, 00:02:13.604 --> 00:02:18.171 is introduced just before the presentation of the original stimulus. 00:02:21.431 --> 00:02:22.622 [bell rings] 00:02:25.142 --> 00:02:25.964 [bell rings] 00:02:27.804 --> 00:02:28.784 [bell rings] 00:02:28.784 --> 00:02:31.853 If the neutral or signaling stimulus is presented alone, 00:02:31.853 --> 00:02:36.314 and a response occurs, as if the original stimulus were still there, 00:02:36.314 --> 00:02:38.644 we say that conditioning has taken place. 00:02:38.644 --> 00:02:39.736 [bell rings] 00:02:39.736 --> 00:02:43.475 The arbitrary neutral stimulus becomes a conditioned stimulus. 00:02:43.475 --> 00:02:45.166 [bell rings] 00:02:45.166 --> 00:02:47.745 The reverse is also true. 00:02:47.745 --> 00:02:52.619 Pavlov and others studied the extinction over time of such conditioned responses. 00:02:52.619 --> 00:02:53.746 [bell rings] 00:02:55.446 --> 00:02:59.610 When the subject learns that the conditioned stimulus no longer signals a desired event, 00:02:59.610 --> 00:03:00.610 [bell rings] 00:03:00.610 --> 00:03:05.497 the acquisition process is reversed as the learned connection is gradually weakened. 00:03:05.617 --> 00:03:11.239 [bell rings continuously] 00:03:11.239 --> 00:03:15.986 Pavlov's work, and the work of those who followed him, led to a remarkable conclusion, 00:03:15.986 --> 00:03:19.823 and that is, any stimulus an organism can perceive 00:03:19.823 --> 00:03:24.531 is capable of eliciting any reaction the organism is capable of making. 00:03:25.051 --> 00:03:31.990 This means that virtually any sound, sight, or smell can influence the way our muscles tense or relax, 00:03:31.990 --> 00:03:35.908 our moods fluctuate, or even the way our attitudes are formed. 00:03:36.308 --> 00:03:39.978 For instance, if I say "Relax," and then do this, 00:03:39.978 --> 00:03:41.051 [gun shot] 00:03:41.051 --> 00:03:42.930 you're going to be startled and upset. 00:03:43.350 --> 00:03:47.435 After five or six pairings of "relax", [gun shot] 00:03:47.435 --> 00:03:49.580 just saying the word "relax" 00:03:49.580 --> 00:03:55.750 is going to generate a negative response, rather than its usual learned reaction.