1
00:00:00,960 --> 00:00:02,416
I published this article

2
00:00:02,440 --> 00:00:06,816
in the New York Times Modern Love column
in January of this year.

3
00:00:06,840 --> 00:00:09,176
"To Fall in Love With Anyone, Do This."

4
00:00:09,200 --> 00:00:11,496
And the article
is about a psychological study

5
00:00:11,520 --> 00:00:14,936
designed to create romantic love
in the laboratory,

6
00:00:14,960 --> 00:00:17,696
and my own experience
trying the study myself

7
00:00:17,720 --> 00:00:19,576
one night last summer.

8
00:00:19,600 --> 00:00:22,336
So the procedure is fairly simple:

9
00:00:22,360 --> 00:00:29,216
two strangers take turns asking each other
36 increasingly personal questions

10
00:00:29,240 --> 00:00:32,136
and then they stare into each other's eyes

11
00:00:32,159 --> 00:00:34,720
without speaking for four minutes.

12
00:00:35,360 --> 00:00:38,736
So here are a couple of sample questions.

13
00:00:38,760 --> 00:00:44,016
Number 12: If you could wake up tomorrow
having gained any one quality or ability,

14
00:00:44,040 --> 00:00:45,240
what would it be?

15
00:00:46,240 --> 00:00:50,936
Number 28: When did you last cry
in front of another person?

16
00:00:50,960 --> 00:00:52,176
By yourself?

17
00:00:52,200 --> 00:00:56,456
As you can see, they really do
get more personal as they go along.

18
00:00:56,480 --> 00:00:58,856
Number 30, I really like this one:

19
00:00:58,880 --> 00:01:01,736
Tell your partner
what you like about them;

20
00:01:01,760 --> 00:01:03,616
be very honest this time,

21
00:01:03,640 --> 00:01:08,000
saying things you might not say
to someone you just met.

22
00:01:08,840 --> 00:01:13,376
So when I first came across this study
a few years earlier,

23
00:01:13,400 --> 00:01:15,496
one detail really stuck out to me,

24
00:01:15,520 --> 00:01:18,576
and that was the rumor
that two of the participants

25
00:01:18,600 --> 00:01:21,096
had gotten married six months later,

26
00:01:21,120 --> 00:01:25,296
and they'd invited the entire lab
to the ceremony.

27
00:01:25,320 --> 00:01:28,176
So I was of course very skeptical

28
00:01:28,200 --> 00:01:31,856
about this process of just
manufacturing romantic love,

29
00:01:31,880 --> 00:01:34,736
but of course I was intrigued.

30
00:01:34,760 --> 00:01:38,176
And when I got the chance
to try this study myself,

31
00:01:38,200 --> 00:01:41,336
with someone I knew
but not particularly well,

32
00:01:41,360 --> 00:01:44,496
I wasn't expecting to fall in love.

33
00:01:44,520 --> 00:01:47,216
But then we did, and --

34
00:01:47,240 --> 00:01:49,136
(Laughter)

35
00:01:49,160 --> 00:01:53,536
And I thought it made a good story,
so I sent it to the Modern Love column

36
00:01:53,560 --> 00:01:55,376
a few months later.

37
00:01:55,400 --> 00:01:59,120
Now, this was published in January,

38
00:01:59,880 --> 00:02:01,576
and now it is August,

39
00:02:01,600 --> 00:02:05,216
so I'm guessing that some of you
are probably wondering,

40
00:02:05,240 --> 00:02:07,616
are we still together?

41
00:02:07,640 --> 00:02:10,015
And the reason I think
you might be wondering this

42
00:02:10,039 --> 00:02:12,696
is because I have been asked this question

43
00:02:12,720 --> 00:02:16,656
again and again and again
for the past seven months.

44
00:02:16,680 --> 00:02:20,376
And this question is really
what I want to talk about today.

45
00:02:20,400 --> 00:02:21,856
But let's come back to it.

46
00:02:21,880 --> 00:02:24,856
(Laughter)

47
00:02:24,880 --> 00:02:26,856
So the week before the article came out,

48
00:02:26,880 --> 00:02:29,576
I was very nervous.

49
00:02:29,600 --> 00:02:32,176
I had been working
on a book about love stories

50
00:02:32,200 --> 00:02:34,016
for the past few years,

51
00:02:34,040 --> 00:02:36,856
so I had gotten used to writing
about my own experiences

52
00:02:36,880 --> 00:02:39,896
with romantic love on my blog.

53
00:02:39,920 --> 00:02:44,496
But a blog post might get
a couple hundred views at the most,

54
00:02:44,520 --> 00:02:47,616
and those were usually
just my Facebook friends,

55
00:02:47,640 --> 00:02:50,216
and I figured my article
in the New York Times

56
00:02:50,240 --> 00:02:53,040
would probably get a few thousand views.

57
00:02:54,080 --> 00:02:56,856
And that felt like a lot of attention

58
00:02:56,880 --> 00:03:00,056
on a relatively new relationship.

59
00:03:00,080 --> 00:03:03,360
But as it turned out, I had no idea.

60
00:03:04,240 --> 00:03:06,136
So the article was published online

61
00:03:06,160 --> 00:03:08,216
on a Friday evening,

62
00:03:08,240 --> 00:03:14,376
and by Saturday, this had happened
to the traffic on my blog.

63
00:03:14,400 --> 00:03:19,280
And by Sunday, both the Today Show
and Good Morning America had called.

64
00:03:20,720 --> 00:03:25,256
Within a month, the article
would receive over 8 million views,

65
00:03:25,280 --> 00:03:27,576
and I was, to say the least,

66
00:03:27,600 --> 00:03:31,496
underprepared for this sort of attention.

67
00:03:31,520 --> 00:03:34,496
It's one thing to work up
the confidence to write honestly

68
00:03:34,520 --> 00:03:36,616
about your experiences with love,

69
00:03:36,640 --> 00:03:39,096
but it is another thing to discover

70
00:03:39,120 --> 00:03:42,096
that your love life
has made international news --

71
00:03:42,120 --> 00:03:43,336
(Laughter)

72
00:03:43,360 --> 00:03:47,176
and to realize
that people across the world

73
00:03:47,200 --> 00:03:52,176
are genuinely invested
in the status of your new relationship.

74
00:03:52,200 --> 00:03:54,376
(Laughter)

75
00:03:54,400 --> 00:03:59,216
And when people called or emailed,
which they did every day for weeks,

76
00:03:59,240 --> 00:04:02,576
they always asked the same question first:

77
00:04:02,600 --> 00:04:05,256
are you guys still together?

78
00:04:05,280 --> 00:04:07,616
In fact, as I was preparing this talk,

79
00:04:07,640 --> 00:04:09,896
I did a quick search of my email inbox

80
00:04:09,920 --> 00:04:11,856
for the phrase "Are you still together?"

81
00:04:11,880 --> 00:04:14,576
and several messages
popped up immediately.

82
00:04:14,600 --> 00:04:17,255
They were from students and journalists

83
00:04:17,279 --> 00:04:20,296
and friendly strangers like this one.

84
00:04:20,320 --> 00:04:22,776
I did radio interviews and they asked.

85
00:04:22,800 --> 00:04:26,736
I even gave a talk, and one woman
shouted up to the stage,

86
00:04:26,760 --> 00:04:30,096
"Hey Mandy, where's your boyfriend?"

87
00:04:30,120 --> 00:04:33,416
And I promptly turned bright red.

88
00:04:33,440 --> 00:04:36,256
I understand that this
is part of the deal.

89
00:04:36,280 --> 00:04:39,816
If you write about your relationship
in an international newspaper,

90
00:04:39,840 --> 00:04:43,496
you should expect people
to feel comfortable asking about it.

91
00:04:43,520 --> 00:04:48,456
But I just wasn't prepared
for the scope of the response.

92
00:04:48,480 --> 00:04:52,336
The 36 questions seem
to have taken on a life of their own.

93
00:04:52,360 --> 00:04:55,776
In fact, the New York Times
published a follow-up article

94
00:04:55,800 --> 00:04:57,016
for Valentine's Day,

95
00:04:57,040 --> 00:05:01,536
which featured readers' experiences
of trying the study themselves,

96
00:05:01,560 --> 00:05:03,840
with varying degrees of success.

97
00:05:04,960 --> 00:05:09,176
So my first impulse
in the face of all of this attention

98
00:05:09,200 --> 00:05:12,640
was to become very protective
of my own relationship.

99
00:05:13,920 --> 00:05:16,936
I said no to every request
for the two of us

100
00:05:16,960 --> 00:05:19,296
to do a media appearance together.

101
00:05:19,320 --> 00:05:21,016
I turned down TV interviews,

102
00:05:21,040 --> 00:05:25,176
and I said no to every request
for photos of the two us.

103
00:05:25,200 --> 00:05:27,776
I think I was afraid that we would become

104
00:05:27,800 --> 00:05:31,936
inadvertent icons
for the process of falling in love,

105
00:05:31,960 --> 00:05:35,680
a position I did not at all
feel qualified for.

106
00:05:36,760 --> 00:05:39,216
And I get it:

107
00:05:39,240 --> 00:05:42,016
people didn't just want to know
if the study worked,

108
00:05:42,040 --> 00:05:44,976
they wanted to know if it really worked:

109
00:05:45,000 --> 00:05:49,696
that is, if it was capable
of producing love that would last,

110
00:05:49,720 --> 00:05:55,096
not just a fling, but real love,
sustainable love.

111
00:05:55,120 --> 00:05:59,216
But this was a question
I didn't feel capable of answering.

112
00:05:59,240 --> 00:06:01,936
My own relationship
was only a few months old,

113
00:06:01,960 --> 00:06:06,720
and I felt like people were asking
the wrong question in the first place.

114
00:06:08,040 --> 00:06:12,176
What would knowing whether or not
we were still together really tell them?

115
00:06:12,200 --> 00:06:13,856
If the answer was no,

116
00:06:13,880 --> 00:06:17,856
would it make the experience
of doing these 36 questions

117
00:06:17,880 --> 00:06:20,080
any less worthwhile?

118
00:06:20,800 --> 00:06:23,576
Dr. Arthur Aron first wrote
about these questions

119
00:06:23,600 --> 00:06:27,976
in this study here in 1997,

120
00:06:28,000 --> 00:06:32,736
and here, the researcher's goal
was not to produce romantic love.

121
00:06:32,760 --> 00:06:34,696
Instead, they wanted to foster

122
00:06:34,720 --> 00:06:38,176
interpersonal closeness
among college students,

123
00:06:38,200 --> 00:06:40,936
by using what Aron called

124
00:06:40,960 --> 00:06:45,856
"sustained, escalating, reciprocal,
personalistic self-disclosure."

125
00:06:45,880 --> 00:06:48,360
Sounds romantic, doesn't it?

126
00:06:49,600 --> 00:06:51,256
But the study did work.

127
00:06:51,280 --> 00:06:54,336
The participants
did feel closer after doing it,

128
00:06:54,360 --> 00:06:59,656
and several subsequent studies have also
used Aron's fast friends protocol

129
00:06:59,680 --> 00:07:03,816
as a way to quickly create
trust and intimacy between strangers.

130
00:07:03,840 --> 00:07:07,269
They've used it between members
of the police and members of community,

131
00:07:07,293 --> 00:07:10,853
and they've used it between people
of opposing political ideologies.

132
00:07:11,800 --> 00:07:13,576
The original version of the story,

133
00:07:13,600 --> 00:07:16,096
the one that I tried last summer,

134
00:07:16,120 --> 00:07:20,336
that pairs the personal questions
with four minutes of eye contact,

135
00:07:20,360 --> 00:07:22,456
was referenced in this article,

136
00:07:22,480 --> 00:07:25,080
but unfortunately it was never published.

137
00:07:26,640 --> 00:07:29,656
So a few months ago, I was giving a talk

138
00:07:29,680 --> 00:07:31,976
at a small liberal arts college,

139
00:07:32,000 --> 00:07:34,696
and a student came up to me afterwards

140
00:07:34,720 --> 00:07:36,640
and he said, kind of shyly,

141
00:07:37,360 --> 00:07:42,376
"So, I tried your study,
and it didn't work."

142
00:07:42,400 --> 00:07:45,656
He seemed a little mystified by this.

143
00:07:45,680 --> 00:07:50,456
"You mean, you didn't fall in love
with the person you did it with?" I asked.

144
00:07:50,480 --> 00:07:52,896
"Well..." He paused.

145
00:07:52,920 --> 00:07:55,400
"I think she just wants to be friends."

146
00:07:57,480 --> 00:08:01,216
"But did you become
better friends?" I asked.

147
00:08:01,240 --> 00:08:04,896
"Did you feel like you got to really
know each other after doing the study?"

148
00:08:04,920 --> 00:08:06,216
He nodded.

149
00:08:06,240 --> 00:08:09,176
"So, then it worked," I said.

150
00:08:09,200 --> 00:08:13,416
I don't think this is the answer
he was looking for.

151
00:08:13,440 --> 00:08:17,776
In fact, I don't think this is the answer
that any of us are looking for

152
00:08:17,800 --> 00:08:20,056
when it comes to love.

153
00:08:20,080 --> 00:08:21,816
I first came across this study

154
00:08:21,840 --> 00:08:23,296
when I was 29

155
00:08:23,320 --> 00:08:26,736
and I was going through
a really difficult breakup.

156
00:08:26,760 --> 00:08:29,376
I had been in the relationship
since I was 20,

157
00:08:29,400 --> 00:08:32,176
which was basically my entire adult life,

158
00:08:32,200 --> 00:08:34,296
and he was my first real love,

159
00:08:34,320 --> 00:08:39,416
and I had no idea how or if
I could make a life without him.

160
00:08:39,440 --> 00:08:41,816
So I turned to science.

161
00:08:41,840 --> 00:08:46,416
I researched everything I could find
about the science of romantic love,

162
00:08:46,440 --> 00:08:51,536
and I think I was hoping that it might
somehow inoculate me from heartache.

163
00:08:51,560 --> 00:08:54,200
I don't know if I realized
this at the time --

164
00:08:55,120 --> 00:08:58,416
I thought I was just doing research
for this book I was writing --

165
00:08:58,440 --> 00:09:01,856
but it seems really obvious in retrospect.

166
00:09:01,880 --> 00:09:06,296
I hoped that if I armed myself
with the knowledge of romantic love,

167
00:09:06,320 --> 00:09:10,960
I might never have to feel
as terrible and lonely as I did then.

168
00:09:12,320 --> 00:09:16,616
And all this knowledge
has been useful in some ways.

169
00:09:16,640 --> 00:09:19,936
I am more patient with love.
I am more relaxed.

170
00:09:19,960 --> 00:09:23,536
I am more confident
about asking for what I want.

171
00:09:23,560 --> 00:09:27,296
But I can also see myself more clearly,

172
00:09:27,320 --> 00:09:31,576
and I can see that what I want
is sometimes more

173
00:09:31,600 --> 00:09:34,656
than can reasonably be asked for.

174
00:09:34,680 --> 00:09:38,136
What I want from love is a guarantee,

175
00:09:38,160 --> 00:09:40,376
not just that I am loved today

176
00:09:40,400 --> 00:09:42,816
and that I will be loved tomorrow,

177
00:09:42,840 --> 00:09:48,040
but that I will continue to be loved
by the person I love indefinitely.

178
00:09:49,240 --> 00:09:52,736
Maybe it's this possibility of a guarantee

179
00:09:52,760 --> 00:09:54,736
that people were really asking about

180
00:09:54,760 --> 00:09:57,480
when they wanted to know
if we were still together.

181
00:09:58,800 --> 00:10:02,736
So the story that the media told
about the 36 questions

182
00:10:02,760 --> 00:10:06,056
was that there might be
a shortcut to falling in love.

183
00:10:06,080 --> 00:10:09,816
There might be a way to somehow
mitigate some of the risk involved,

184
00:10:09,840 --> 00:10:12,456
and this is a very appealing story,

185
00:10:12,480 --> 00:10:15,656
because falling in love feels amazing,

186
00:10:15,680 --> 00:10:18,416
but it's also terrifying.

187
00:10:18,440 --> 00:10:21,016
The moment you admit to loving someone,

188
00:10:21,040 --> 00:10:23,680
you admit to having a lot to lose,

189
00:10:24,640 --> 00:10:28,856
and it's true that these questions
do provide a mechanism

190
00:10:28,880 --> 00:10:31,176
for getting to know someone quickly,

191
00:10:31,200 --> 00:10:33,736
which is also a mechanism for being known,

192
00:10:33,760 --> 00:10:38,216
and I think this is the thing
that most of us really want from love:

193
00:10:38,240 --> 00:10:42,320
to be known, to be seen, to be understood.

194
00:10:43,200 --> 00:10:45,136
But I think when it comes to love,

195
00:10:45,160 --> 00:10:49,656
we are too willing to accept
the short version of the story.

196
00:10:49,680 --> 00:10:53,256
The version of the story that asks,
"Are you still together?"

197
00:10:53,280 --> 00:10:56,400
and is content with a yes or no answer.

198
00:10:57,560 --> 00:10:59,496
So rather than that question,

199
00:10:59,520 --> 00:11:03,176
I would propose we ask
some more difficult questions,

200
00:11:03,200 --> 00:11:04,400
questions like:

201
00:11:05,080 --> 00:11:08,096
How do you decide who deserves your love

202
00:11:08,120 --> 00:11:09,360
and who does not?

203
00:11:10,840 --> 00:11:14,096
How do you stay in love
when things get difficult,

204
00:11:14,120 --> 00:11:16,640
and how do you know
when to just cut and run?

205
00:11:17,880 --> 00:11:19,776
How do you live with the doubt

206
00:11:19,800 --> 00:11:22,816
that inevitably creeps
into every relationship,

207
00:11:22,840 --> 00:11:24,456
or even harder,

208
00:11:24,480 --> 00:11:26,840
how do you live with your partner's doubt?

209
00:11:27,800 --> 00:11:31,416
I don't necessarily know
the answers to these questions,

210
00:11:31,440 --> 00:11:36,576
but I think they're an important start
at having a more thoughtful conversation

211
00:11:36,600 --> 00:11:38,760
about what it means to love someone.

212
00:11:40,080 --> 00:11:42,416
So, if you want it,

213
00:11:42,440 --> 00:11:46,736
the short version of the story
of my relationship is this:

214
00:11:46,760 --> 00:11:49,856
a year ago, an acquaintance
and I did a study

215
00:11:49,880 --> 00:11:52,576
designed to create romantic love,

216
00:11:52,600 --> 00:11:54,296
and we fell in love,

217
00:11:54,320 --> 00:11:56,176
and we are still together,

218
00:11:56,200 --> 00:11:58,360
and I am so glad.

219
00:11:59,040 --> 00:12:03,800
But falling in love is not
the same thing as staying in love.

220
00:12:04,440 --> 00:12:06,840
Falling in love is the easy part.

221
00:12:08,360 --> 00:12:12,736
So at the end of my article, I wrote,
"Love didn't happen to us.

222
00:12:12,760 --> 00:12:16,056
We're in love because we each
made the choice to be."

223
00:12:16,080 --> 00:12:20,256
And I cringe a little
when I read that now,

224
00:12:20,280 --> 00:12:22,576
not because it isn't true,

225
00:12:22,600 --> 00:12:25,816
but because at the time,
I really hadn't considered

226
00:12:25,840 --> 00:12:29,456
everything that was contained
in that choice.

227
00:12:29,480 --> 00:12:34,696
I didn't consider how many times
we would each have to make that choice,

228
00:12:34,720 --> 00:12:38,296
and how many times I will continue
to have to make that choice

229
00:12:38,320 --> 00:12:42,136
without knowing whether or not
he will always choose me.

230
00:12:42,160 --> 00:12:47,656
I want it to be enough to have asked
and answered 36 questions,

231
00:12:47,680 --> 00:12:52,896
and to have chosen to love someone
so generous and kind and fun

232
00:12:52,920 --> 00:12:57,920
and to have broadcast that choice
in the biggest newspaper in America.

233
00:12:58,880 --> 00:13:01,976
But what I have done instead
is turn my relationship

234
00:13:02,000 --> 00:13:06,176
into the kind of myth
I don't quite believe in.

235
00:13:06,200 --> 00:13:10,456
And what I want, what perhaps
I will spend my life wanting,

236
00:13:10,480 --> 00:13:13,176
is for that myth to be true.

237
00:13:13,200 --> 00:13:17,976
I want the happy ending
implied by the title to my article,

238
00:13:18,000 --> 00:13:19,496
which is, incidentally,

239
00:13:19,520 --> 00:13:23,176
the only part of the article
that I didn't actually write.

240
00:13:23,200 --> 00:13:26,496
(Laughter)

241
00:13:26,520 --> 00:13:31,216
But what I have instead is the chance
to make the choice to love someone,

242
00:13:31,240 --> 00:13:34,696
and the hope that he will choose
to love me back,

243
00:13:34,720 --> 00:13:37,416
and it is terrifying,

244
00:13:37,440 --> 00:13:39,176
but that's the deal with love.

245
00:13:39,200 --> 00:13:40,440
Thank you.