0:00:00.080,0:00:03.240
If you like Italian, you will surely know that

0:00:03.240,0:00:07.640
this language and most of its words come from Latin.

0:00:07.640,0:00:13.080
However, let's take this phrase (very natural, and which we say every day): as a joke,

0:00:13.080,0:00:24.480
I stole a bench from the hotel, but the guard saw me and broke my shin. No

0:00:24.480,0:00:29.240
term in this beautiful sentence, beyond the grammatical ones and the verb to see,

0:00:29.240,0:00:35.840
is of Latin origin. This is because Italian has taken many words, even quite common ones,

0:00:35.840,0:00:42.160
from Germanic languages. Words like look, drive, lose, joke,

0:00:42.160,0:00:48.480
earn and many others are very ancient Germanisms - this is the topic of today's video.

0:00:48.480,0:00:53.240
Ah, and this is Podcast Italiano, a channel for those who learn or love the

0:00:53.240,0:00:58.120
Italian language. If you need it, you can turn on subtitles. If you learn Italian on my

0:00:58.120,0:01:04.240
website you will find the transcription of everything I will say in the video: the link is in the description.

0:01:04.240,0:01:10.280
The words I listed earlier, such as war, hotel and many others, were borrowed to us

0:01:10.280,0:01:15.160
, so to speak, from languages ​​of the Germanic family.

0:01:15.160,0:01:22.779
All the Barban languages ​​are part of this family ... descending from a common ancestor called Proto-Germanic.

0:01:22.779,0:01:26.640
Germanisms can be from any era, ancient or modern, but in this video we

0:01:26.640,0:01:31.960
will focus particularly on the ancient ones, which mostly date back to the Early

0:01:31.960,0:01:37.000
Middle Ages, because they tell us something interesting about the history of our country.

0:01:37.000,0:01:42.160
But let's start with the oldest ones of all, which date back to before the Middle Ages: they are the

0:01:42.160,0:01:53.440
Paleo-Germanisms. Nothing to do with dinosaurs and Jurassic Park (sorry, Elena): it is

0:01:53.440,0:01:59.280
a term used by some scholars to indicate Germanic words lent not to Italian,

0:01:59.280,0:02:06.000
but already to Latin, from which they then arrived in Italian . These ancestral Germanisms,

0:02:06.000,0:02:12.920
so to speak, are not very many: for example we have words like soap, yew and spade.

0:02:12.920,0:02:17.960
Every now and then, Germanic words were adopted to express a new concept, for which

0:02:17.960,0:02:23.400
there was not yet a word. It is the example of moose, lent to Latin by a Germanic culture which

0:02:23.400,0:02:29.840
evidently dealt with moose more often than the Romans. These are called borrowings of necessity,

0:02:30.400,0:02:36.200
precisely because in a certain sense they are necessary (or at least useful) to the target language,

0:02:36.200,0:02:39.160
which does not have a word to designate that concept.

0:02:39.160,0:02:45.040
The word spade, however, allows us to observe the opposite phenomenon, that is, luxury borrowing:

0:02:45.040,0:02:50.000
as the name already explains, this type of borrowing is not strictly necessary,

0:02:50.000,0:02:55.080
because a word for the concept in question would already exist in the target language ; however,

0:02:55.080,0:03:00.400
for a series of reasons, it is decided to adopt a foreign word and replace it with the

0:03:00.400,0:03:08.440
native one. For example, the Germanic word war replaces the Latin word bellum.

0:03:08.440,0:03:13.440
Among these very ancient Germanisms we also have blue, brown, ember,

0:03:13.440,0:03:19.440
stable and above all, the adorable marten. But look at her, isn't she adorable?

0:03:19.440,0:03:24.000
Well, but why were all these Germanic words adopted in

0:03:24.000,0:03:30.800
Latin first, and in Italian or, well, proto-Italian, proto-Romance varieties then?

0:03:30.800,0:03:35.280
Here we have to talk a little about the history of our country. Already during the Roman Empire,

0:03:35.280,0:03:39.640
there were numerous invasions by barbarian… ahem, Germanic peoples,

0:03:39.640,0:03:43.560
which generated contact between the Roman people and that of the invaders;

0:03:43.560,0:03:49.840
and contact between peoples also means contact between languages, and therefore linguistic interference,

0:03:49.840,0:03:54.440
and therefore borrowing. It's like when an Italian goes to England for three months

0:03:54.440,0:03:59.720
and comes back putting anglicisms in every sentence he says. And then there were not only invasions,

0:04:00.280,0:04:05.200
but also trade and other types of interactions. Finally, gradually,

0:04:05.200,0:04:10.200
the units made up of Germanic soldiers became increasingly larger in the Roman army.

0:04:10.200,0:04:15.840
And after the fall of the Western Roman Empire, the Germanic peoples settled permanently

0:04:15.840,0:04:20.280
in central-southern Europe; and, in particular, in Italy there were centuries

0:04:20.280,0:04:27.000
of invasions and even Germanic kingdoms. In particular, we talk about Ostrogoths,

0:04:27.000,0:04:33.920
Lombards and Franks. This explains our great linguistic interference. Consider that

0:04:33.920,0:04:40.280
the Ostrogoths (i.e. the eastern Goths; because the Visigoths were the western Goths) began

0:04:40.280,0:04:46.680
to reign in Italy at the end of the 5th century AD, and lost power towards the middle of the 6th,

0:04:46.680,0:04:51.120
then merging, over time, with the local population. At this point,

0:04:51.120,0:04:56.240
the entire Italian territory was under the dominion of the Germanic peoples. The Lombards, meanwhile,

0:04:56.240,0:05:01.600
entered Italy around the middle of the 6th century and began to conquer it, although they never

0:05:01.600,0:05:06.840
managed to obtain the entire territory. When the increasingly powerful Lombard kings

0:05:06.840,0:05:13.240
arrived in Rome in the 8th century, the popes turned to the Franks, another Germanic people,

0:05:13.240,0:05:21.720
who were becoming the great European power of the time. Thus, from 774 AD, the Franks took

0:05:21.720,0:05:28.160
control of the former Lombard Kingdom, led by a certain Charlemagne (maybe you know him);

0:05:28.160,0:05:33.680
but, unlike the two previous cases, there is no mass migration towards the boot.

0:05:33.680,0:05:38.480
Even though we have a lot of information about this historical period, it is not always easy

0:05:38.480,0:05:44.600
to understand whether a certain Germanic word came to us from the Ostrogoths, the Lombards or the Franks,

0:05:44.600,0:05:48.800
given that in any case they were all Germanic languages ​​related to each other. For

0:05:48.800,0:05:56.240
example, truce could come from the Gothic triggwa, the Franconian triuwa or the Longoboard trewwa:

0:05:56.240,0:06:02.480
and it is also possible that it was a mixture of different Germanic words. Scholars

0:06:02.480,0:06:06.360
are often unsure. What we can say with certainty, however, is that

0:06:06.360,0:06:11.760
we have received quite a few words from these peoples: from the Lombards alone, almost three hundred,

0:06:11.760,0:06:15.600
according to some estimates. Among these, for example, those that Barbero reminds us of.

0:06:15.600,0:06:22.440
They are Lombard words war, brawl, truce, feud, bar,

0:06:22.440,0:06:25.640
trap, in short they were quite violent people.

0:06:25.640,0:06:29.680
Over the centuries, Italian also borrows from what can

0:06:29.680,0:06:35.040
already be called German (though not modern German, of course). In fact,

0:06:35.040,0:06:40.120
contacts with "Germany" (which did not yet exist) continued intense for centuries:

0:06:40.120,0:06:44.640
for example, Central-Northern Italy was part of the Holy Roman Empire for a long time and

0:06:44.640,0:06:48.800
German mercenaries often fought in the Italian wars. Today, however,

0:06:48.800,0:06:54.280
I want to focus in particular on the most ancient Germanisms, those of the Early Middle Ages,

0:06:54.280,0:07:00.080
perhaps leaving the so-called Germanisms, that is, words that derive from German in different eras, for a future video

0:07:00.080,0:07:05.000
. But I want to say something about the word "German": why

0:07:05.000,0:07:12.960
do we have this strange adjective in Italian when in other languages ​​we say German, Allemand, Aleman?

0:07:12.960,0:07:19.200
The adjective German ultimately comes from a Gothic word, thiuda, which meant

0:07:19.200,0:07:26.200
"people" and is related to that Deutsch of Deutschland. So, friends, it's not that strange.

0:07:26.200,0:07:30.680
Good, but in practice how did these ancient Germanisms pass into Italian?

0:07:30.680,0:07:34.920
Apart from the fact that, as always, everything depends a lot on the historical moment,

0:07:34.920,0:07:41.040
because there was a long interaction between Italy and the Germanic peoples, we can say that the loanwords

0:07:41.040,0:07:46.480
coming from ancient Franconian (the language of the Franks) often entered late Latin (or, if we want,

0:07:46.480,0:07:53.480
in a proto-Romance state, when Latin was becoming Romance languages) often by written means,

0:07:53.480,0:07:59.000
through the language of the chancelleries (i.e. public offices that were responsible for drawing up documents;

0:07:59.000,0:08:03.880
in fact therefore the language of the bureaucracy) because the Franks they occupied precisely the

0:08:03.880,0:08:10.240
high-ranking environments, and were rather concerned with governing, rather than populating Italy en masse.

0:08:10.240,0:08:14.880
More often, however, the loans came orally from the Lombard language;

0:08:14.880,0:08:18.960
but it is also true that the Lombards, who came before the Franks, also

0:08:18.960,0:08:23.640
reigned in Italy, and in fact some words that have come down to us from the Lombard come

0:08:23.640,0:08:29.080
from the legal chancellery field: we have, for example, truce and feud.

0:08:29.080,0:08:32.760
We must not forget indirect loans. We have seen,

0:08:32.760,0:08:38.280
speaking of Paleogermanisms, that Latin has left us Germanic terms,

0:08:38.280,0:08:43.240
taken even before neo-Latin languages ​​such as Italian, French, Spanish,

0:08:43.240,0:08:48.160
Portuguese or Romanian were formed. We have also seen that late and medieval Latin,

0:08:48.160,0:08:54.040
through writing, indirectly left us many terms from Franconian. But there are other cases:

0:08:54.040,0:08:59.400
Old French, for example, left us many words that it had in turn taken

0:08:59.400,0:09:04.640
from Franconian. As we also saw in the video on Italianisms, words often make the rounds,

0:09:04.640,0:09:09.880
passing from one language to another: for example, if you remember, "baguette" is a Frenchism

0:09:09.880,0:09:14.800
common in many languages, but which French in turn took from the Italian “bacchetta”.

0:09:14.800,0:09:17.440
Ok, but what kind of words entered Italian?

0:09:17.440,0:09:21.480
Again, it all depends on the historical context and when

0:09:21.480,0:09:24.640
the term was borrowed. We can, however,

0:09:24.640,0:09:28.600
isolate some specific areas. For example, as you may have imagined by now,

0:09:28.600,0:09:35.520
we have received several terms related to the military world, such as war, guard and brawl.

0:09:35.520,0:09:41.000
There are many – this may surprise you – terms to indicate the parts of the body of humans and

0:09:41.000,0:09:50.560
animals: we have cheek, spleen, knuckle, shin, span and tusk. I really like zanna because in

0:09:50.560,0:09:57.040
modern German it is the same as the Lombard word from which the Italian one derives: zahn. In Italian,

0:09:57.040,0:10:02.840
however, zanna is used only for the particularly robust teeth of some animals, such as elephants. And

0:10:02.840,0:10:10.120
even spleen in German is very similar: milz. However, not because Italian took it from German,

0:10:10.120,0:10:15.440
but because Italian took it from Lombard, which was a Germanic language related to the

0:10:15.440,0:10:21.760
ancient language from which modern German descends. There is also strozza with the meaning of throat,

0:10:21.760,0:10:28.191
a term no longer used today, but which remains in the very common verb to strangle or choke.

0:10:28.191,0:10:32.760
I always find a good reason to strangle you! I'll choke you and I'll choke you again!

0:10:32.760,0:10:36.920
There are also many terms related to the house and domestic life:

0:10:36.920,0:10:44.440
balcony, mezzanine, bench, shelf, pillowcase and hanger among others.

0:10:44.440,0:10:48.040
Less common are legal and administrative words. Some, however, are

0:10:48.040,0:10:52.280
quite well known: for example the already mentioned truce and feud.

0:10:52.280,0:10:57.680
Finally, we have many concrete and expressive terms: grab, snore,

0:10:57.680,0:11:02.160
joke, stench (i.e. bad smell) and thud.

0:11:02.160,0:11:07.600
As you can see, the type of words that come from a certain people depends on their culture.

0:11:07.600,0:11:12.240
As Barbero says, speaking specifically of the Lombards, "they were not a society of philosophers".

0:11:12.240,0:11:16.720
We know that each language has its own set of sounds and its own way of putting them together;

0:11:16.720,0:11:20.920
thus, Japanese doesn't sound like Arabic, which doesn't sound like Italian, which in turn doesn't

0:11:20.920,0:11:26.880
sound like English. Can you imagine if we talk about things? 🙂 It is clear, therefore, that words, passing

0:11:26.880,0:11:31.840
from one language to another, will have to be adapted somewhat to the structures of the target language.

0:11:31.840,0:11:36.680
As previously mentioned, we are dealing in particular with very

0:11:36.680,0:11:42.360
ancient Germanisms; and the fact is interesting, because the ancient borrowings have been adapted

0:11:42.360,0:11:48.080
more heavily than the modern borrowings. If today we are used to foreign languages ​​and

0:11:48.080,0:11:54.960
obviously non-Italian words (like blitz or panzer) don't seem too strange to us, things

0:11:54.960,0:12:00.760
were once different. So let's see how these words were adapted and Italianized.

0:12:00.760,0:12:05.560
First of all, in the presence of a diphthong, it was often reduced to a single

0:12:05.560,0:12:11.440
vowel. So the Franconian rauba has become stuff, and raubon has instead

0:12:11.440,0:12:17.680
become stealing. Later, the Middle High German stainbock became ibex.

0:12:17.680,0:12:23.680
Another common phenomenon is epithesis, or in medical language the correction of a

0:12:23.680,0:12:29.280
defective limb... no, I got the wrong definition, I meant "phenomenon whereby

0:12:29.280,0:12:33.920
a sound is added, and in particular, in this case, a vowel, at the end of a word. Thus,

0:12:33.920,0:12:39.480
the Franconian bank (which indicated a seat along the walls of a house) gave bench

0:12:39.480,0:12:46.160
and bank (or bench), with the addition of o and a endings; from bosk (bush; and yes,

0:12:46.160,0:12:52.480
it is related to the English and German bush/Busch) we got wood; and from want

0:12:52.480,0:12:58.320
we got glove. As I said earlier, knowledge of foreign languages ​​was not widespread

0:12:58.320,0:13:03.520
centuries ago. Some would say that it isn't even today in Italy, but not me. Given that all

0:13:03.520,0:13:09.720
Italian words, with a few (few) exceptions, end with a vowel, the

0:13:09.720,0:13:14.400
average speaker did not feel at ease when faced with a word that ended with a consonant:

0:13:14.400,0:13:18.640
it simply did not come naturally (in a certain sense, it doesn't come so naturally even today:

0:13:18.640,0:13:25.520
which is why we pronounce fan or gol by adding a small final supporting vowel: fannə).

0:13:25.520,0:13:29.600
Furthermore, as we can observe from the example of Stainbock/ibex,

0:13:29.600,0:13:32.320
sometimes the last consonant was doubled,

0:13:32.320,0:13:37.000
and we do the same today: if you hear when I say fannə, double that n.

0:13:37.000,0:13:42.520
Then there is anaptyxis – again, no strange pathologies – whereby

0:13:42.520,0:13:47.720
a vowel was added to a series of consonants, because we Italians don't like too many consonants in a row.

0:13:47.720,0:13:53.520
Let's think of the landsknechts, the German mercenary soldiers who sometimes came to Italy and

0:13:53.520,0:13:58.720
who all Italian readers know thanks to The Betrothed. The original word in German is

0:13:58.720,0:14:06.520
Landsknecht, decidedly unpronounceable for an Italian: and therefore lanzichenecchi. Beautiful, is not it?

0:14:06.520,0:14:11.200
From the eighteenth century, however, knowledge of foreign languages ​​began to be more widespread,

0:14:11.200,0:14:16.800
and so the adaptation of loanwords became less burdensome and their foreign origin gradually

0:14:16.800,0:14:22.400
more evident, as in nickel, fuhrer or panzer. This is why I am especially interested

0:14:22.400,0:14:29.760
in ancient or medieval Germanisms, because they are completely camouflaged in the pile of Latin words.

0:14:29.760,0:14:33.680
Given that Germanisms arrived in Italian at different times,

0:14:33.680,0:14:38.960
and were not part of Italian (and Latin) for the entire history of these languages,

0:14:38.960,0:14:43.360
the normal process of evolution of words did not occur,

0:14:43.360,0:14:48.880
in particular as regards it's about sounds. Furthermore, Germanisms brought sequences

0:14:48.880,0:14:55.160
of sounds in unknown and sometimes even awkward to pronounce positions to Latin and Italian.

0:14:55.160,0:15:01.760
First of all, the intervocalic b of Latin, i.e. placed between vowels, became v, therefore the Latin

0:15:01.760,0:15:12.559
fabulam gave us fable, and the verb habere became to have (here I am referring to the words

0:15:12.559,0:15:15.080
that have been handed down orally for centuries; the cultured Latinisms , “recovered from books” are much

0:15:15.080,0:15:20.760
more similar to the original Latin form, as I explained in this video). Germanisms, however,

0:15:20.760,0:15:25.120
did not experience this change, so the Franconian rauba remained stuff,

0:15:25.120,0:15:30.280
rather than becoming rova, and the Gothic raubon remained steal.

0:15:30.280,0:15:35.160
Let's now look at one of the strongest indications of the Germanic origin of a word.

0:15:35.160,0:15:41.120
Be warned, this is interesting. The word-initial /gw/ sound did not exist in Latin:

0:15:41.120,0:15:45.720
it comes instead from the word-initial /w/ sound of Germanic loanwords. So

0:15:45.720,0:15:52.560
wardon became look, with the addition of the verb ending -are. And so from

0:15:52.560,0:15:58.080
warjan we got heal, again with initial /gw/, this time with -ire.

0:15:58.080,0:16:03.800
And again, we have warnjan, which meant to warn (Does it remind you of the English to warn?

0:16:03.800,0:16:08.760
Nice intuition, totally not driven by me: the two words are in fact related.)

0:16:08.760,0:16:14.440
and which to us gave garnish (once used mainly in a military sense ,

0:16:14.440,0:16:20.760
like "garnishing a city with weapons and ammunition", from which also the garrison, but which today is used

0:16:20.760,0:16:26.480
above all in the kitchen: "garnishing a dish with a side of potatoes"), and then obviously werra,

0:16:26.480,0:16:32.400
which gave us war, wida, who gave us guidance, the Franconian waidhanjan who gave us

0:16:32.400,0:16:39.600
gain or wai from which comes trouble. Like “woe betide you if you don't like this video”.

0:16:39.600,0:16:45.360
In short, almost all words that begin with /gw/ in Italian are Germanic. Almost,

0:16:45.360,0:16:52.240
not all. This mechanism was so widespread and common that it transformed /w/ into /gw/ even in

0:16:52.240,0:16:58.960
Latin words. From vadum, for example, precisely because of this mechanism, the form guado has come to us. Or from

0:16:58.960,0:17:05.760
the Latin… vāgīna (which in Latin was the sheath of a sword or in general a casing), is derived

0:17:05.760,0:17:12.520
guaìna (which today, however, is pronounced guàina, with the accent on the a) and always means sheath,

0:17:12.520,0:17:19.120
casing or membrane where… put something. Erm, you might be wondering… yes, vagina

0:17:19.120,0:17:25.080
obviously comes from the same Latin word, but it is a cultured word, recovered from books.

0:17:25.080,0:17:29.160
With that, we can conclude this journey. We have discovered that there is truly

0:17:29.160,0:17:34.040
a world of very ancient Germanic words that have arrived in Italian since Latin times

0:17:34.040,0:17:38.240
and then in all subsequent centuries; we just don't notice it, because they are

0:17:38.240,0:17:44.320
so camouflaged that today only experts (or you, after this video) can recognize

0:17:44.320,0:17:49.760
their non-Latin origin. Having said that, the Italian lexicon still remains predominantly

0:17:49.760,0:17:58.840
Latin. But what does this mean? You may be interested in this video about it.