0:00:00.000,0:00:04.500
<Introduction to Buddhism I>

0:00:04.500,0:00:10.171
<What Is the Meaning of “Emptiness”?>

0:00:10.171,0:00:13.189
(Questioner) Hi, Sunim, [br]Hi, everyone.

0:00:13.189,0:00:17.369
Raising a question in such a large[br]group makes me a little nervous.

0:00:17.369,0:00:20.326
So, please bear with me.

0:00:20.326,0:00:24.839
The question that I have relates [br]to the concept of emptiness.

0:00:24.839,0:00:27.329
Emptiness has come up [br]in a few of your Dharma talks,

0:00:27.329,0:00:30.217
your videos, and textbooks a few times.

0:00:30.217,0:00:33.969
It also comes up in many [br]of the traditional texts and sutras

0:00:33.969,0:00:36.829
like Diamond Sutra and Heart Sutra.

0:00:36.829,0:00:40.707
Whenever I read through what emptiness [br]means in the Buddhist concept,

0:00:40.707,0:00:44.707
it leaves me a bit more confused

0:00:44.707,0:00:49.572
and sometimes a little bit dampened [br]and slightly demotivated.

0:00:49.572,0:00:55.652
The reason is because the way [br]I understand it is very shallow.

0:00:55.652,0:01:01.782
The way I understand it is that because of[br]the impermanence and the causality

0:01:01.782,0:01:07.229
being dependent on each other,[br]things become empty, or things are empty.

0:01:07.229,0:01:12.178
But my challenge and difficulty [br]with understanding the concept is

0:01:12.178,0:01:17.592
how do I approach it so that I'm not [br]undermining what is important in life,

0:01:17.592,0:01:29.806
for instance, family relationships [br]that matter, or ambitions that matter.

0:01:29.806,0:01:37.465
That's my question.

0:01:37.465,0:01:55.065
(Sunim) We usually express emptiness[br]using the Chinese character

0:01:55.065,0:02:00.128
meaning not filled, empty.

0:02:00.128,0:02:22.258
But how a word is interpreted[br]really depends on the context

0:02:22.258,0:02:24.828
of what came before,[br]and what follows after.

0:02:24.828,0:02:29.411
So, the same word can mean [br]multiple things.

0:02:29.411,0:02:55.193
For example, if you claim that [br]this word can only mean one thing,

0:02:55.193,0:03:00.733
it can be called "form."[br]But if it means multiple things

0:03:00.733,0:03:05.198
depending on the context,[br]we can call it "empty."

0:03:05.198,0:03:07.481
That's what emptiness means.

0:03:07.481,0:03:23.372
Emptiness in this context [br]does not mean a complete absence

0:03:23.372,0:03:25.857
of something or a complete void.

0:03:25.857,0:03:30.812
It really means that everything is[br]contextual and depends on the context

0:03:30.812,0:03:37.430
in which the words are used [br]or the definition the word falls under.

0:03:37.430,0:03:52.876
Let's take an example:[br]Somebody may look at you

0:03:52.876,0:03:56.657
and claim that you are a good person.

0:03:56.657,0:04:00.836
Another person may look at you [br]and say you are a bad person.

0:04:00.836,0:04:11.924
When somebody claims [br]that you're a good person

0:04:11.924,0:04:17.012
that means that you have[br]an essence of goodness in you.

0:04:17.012,0:04:28.082
If somebody says you're a bad person,[br]you have something within you that

0:04:28.082,0:04:31.297
that person perceives as bad.

0:04:31.297,0:04:49.809
So, whether it is a positive element[br]or a negative one, the very assertion that

0:04:49.809,0:04:56.019
such an element exists is what is referred[br]to as "form," in contrast to "emptiness."

0:04:56.019,0:05:16.316
What emptiness refers to is that [br]it's all about that person's perception

0:05:16.316,0:05:21.836
as being good, or that person's [br]perception as being bad,

0:05:21.836,0:05:28.211
but that there's nothing intrinsic [br]within you that's good or bad.

0:05:28.211,0:05:58.135
In other words, you don't have [br]an essential form, element, or attribute

0:05:58.135,0:06:03.385
within you that somebody can point to[br]and say that's good or bad.

0:06:03.385,0:06:09.745
It is just their perception of you, within[br]that specific context of space and time,

0:06:09.745,0:06:13.698
in which they claim you are good or bad.

0:06:13.698,0:06:27.786
So, when somebody says you are[br]a bad person or you're a good person,

0:06:27.786,0:06:31.428
I can say,[br]"You are neither good nor bad.

0:06:31.428,0:06:35.070
You just are. You are emptiness,[br]devoid of a fixed self."

0:06:35.070,0:06:49.234
In that case, empty doesn't mean[br]that you don't exist,

0:06:49.234,0:06:52.924
that there's nothing,[br]or that there's just a void.

0:06:52.924,0:07:00.864
It just means that there's no attribute[br]or an essense within you intrinsically

0:07:00.864,0:07:05.547
that we can call as good or bad.

0:07:05.547,0:07:09.837
Let's say we have this thing.

0:07:09.837,0:07:27.233
Somebody took a little bite [br]of this thing and got healed.

0:07:27.233,0:07:31.580
So, that person said, [br]"This is a great medicine."

0:07:31.580,0:07:41.175
But somebody else took a bite[br]of the same thing and got sick.

0:07:41.175,0:07:48.413
That person pointed the same thing[br]and said that's poison.

0:07:48.413,0:07:57.142
So, is this thing medicine or poison?

0:07:57.142,0:08:00.652
There are three things in this world.

0:08:00.652,0:08:03.902
One is medicine.

0:08:03.902,0:08:06.882
Second is poison.

0:08:06.882,0:08:16.794
And the third is that it has both [br]medicinal and poisonous properties

0:08:16.794,0:08:26.227
But this thing itself is empty.

0:08:26.227,0:08:36.686
That means that it neither has [br]toxic properties nor medicinal properties.

0:08:36.686,0:08:43.807
That means that this is just a thing.

0:08:43.807,0:08:56.212
In whatever context and situation[br]this thing has been applied to,

0:08:56.212,0:09:03.130
it sometimes has medicinal attributes [br]or sometimes has toxic attributes.

0:09:03.130,0:09:17.173
That's when you use the word [br]emptiness or Gong (空) to refer to that

0:09:17.173,0:09:24.578
this is neither medicinal nor toxic, [br]you are neither good nor bad person.

0:09:24.578,0:09:45.528
All existence, whether that's[br]biological or non-biological,

0:09:45.528,0:09:50.046
or even a thought,[br]a mental phenomena,

0:09:50.046,0:09:54.217
is empty (of a fixed nature).[br]It's neither good nor bad.

0:09:54.217,0:10:08.585
That's why "the truth is emptiness." [br]In other words, it simply is what it is.

0:10:08.585,0:10:40.625
How it's represented or manifests[br]really depends on the situation,

0:10:40.625,0:10:45.165
the context, and the connections [br]in which it is allowed to manifest.

0:10:45.165,0:10:48.577
So, in some situations, [br]you are a good person

0:10:48.577,0:10:51.300
and in other situations,[br]you're a bad person.

0:10:51.300,0:10:57.318
In some situations, this thing is[br]medicine; in other, it is poison.

0:10:57.318,0:11:17.391
So, when we say Gong (空), or emptiness,[br]it refers to the true nature of existence-

0:11:17.391,0:11:25.440
just as it is-while Saek (色), or form, is[br]how that nature appears to us

0:11:25.440,0:11:29.638
in various ways,[br]depending on the context or situation.

0:11:29.638,0:11:40.183
Therefore, if you truly understand [br]that the essence of all existence

0:11:40.183,0:11:43.768
is really empty,[br]there's no cause for you to suffer

0:11:43.768,0:11:52.148
because you realize the person is [br]neither bad nor good.

0:11:52.148,0:12:05.514
That doesn't mean [br]that nothing exist.

0:12:05.514,0:12:10.604
That just means that the person[br]in a specific context of space and time,

0:12:10.604,0:12:21.027
under a specific set of conditions, [br]may appear to be good or bad to me.

0:12:21.027,0:12:29.523
It doesn't look like [br]you are fully clear on that.

0:12:29.523,0:12:32.573
(Questioner) I am thinking of[br]how you mentioned

0:12:32.573,0:12:35.683
good or bad sometimes is empty.

0:12:35.683,0:12:40.048
At the same time, I can't help [br]but think of historical dictators

0:12:40.048,0:12:43.220
that have caused a lot of hurt.

0:12:43.220,0:12:46.774
But also, I have in my head[br]explained to myself

0:12:46.774,0:12:59.748
that they have violated the precepts.[br]That's all.

0:12:59.748,0:13:18.583
(Sunim) Even the precepts themselves[br]are empty.

0:13:18.583,0:13:23.098
(Sunim Laughter)

0:13:23.098,0:13:28.129
(Questioner) I guess I am still[br]a little confused about

0:13:28.129,0:13:29.570
the precepts being empty.

0:13:29.570,0:13:33.213
Do you mean they are dependent

0:13:33.213,0:13:47.593
on the historical age we're in, [br]the society that we're in?

0:13:47.593,0:14:07.682
(Sunim) There's no precepts that can be[br]regarded as an "always objective truth,"

0:14:07.682,0:14:12.562
regardless of the context, time, and space[br]that we find ourselves in

0:14:12.562,0:14:17.232
because that is a very dangerous path.

0:14:17.232,0:14:55.212
So, the Buddha taught us [br]that the right way is always determined

0:14:55.212,0:14:59.106
by the space and time of the situation[br]that we are under.

0:14:59.106,0:15:02.363
It's like setting a compass down [br]in a new place and seeing

0:15:02.363,0:15:06.346
where it points north and[br]that's when you find the right way.

0:15:06.346,0:15:10.461
So, everything is dependent; it's not[br]that the right way is predetermined.

0:15:10.461,0:15:12.086
That's the middle way.

0:15:12.086,0:15:18.236
And the concept of the middle way, as it[br]transition over to Mahayana Buddhism,

0:15:18.236,0:15:21.963
became translated [br]or understood as emptiness.

0:15:21.963,0:15:42.983
The emptiness, the concept [br]and the words, was a criticism

0:15:42.983,0:15:46.883
against Theravada kind [br]of rigid traditionalism

0:15:46.883,0:15:54.633
in which they claimed that a certain [br]set of ethical constructions was the way.

0:15:54.633,0:16:05.492
And the criticism in Mahayana against that[br]was that the construct should be empty.

0:16:05.492,0:16:36.072
So basically the original criticism [br]which Theravada's rigid absoluteness

0:16:36.072,0:16:42.982
of the way was that there is no fixed way [br]and that eventually got translated

0:16:42.982,0:16:49.830
and kind of consolidated [br]into the word emptiness.

0:16:49.830,0:17:03.475
Basically when someone [br]claims that this the truth,

0:17:03.475,0:17:08.140
then the criticism is that there's [br]nothing that you can point to and say

0:17:08.140,0:17:19.934
that's the absolute truth, and that got[br]translated into that sense of emptiness.

0:17:19.934,0:17:35.114
So the fact that we misunderstand [br]emptiness or the concept

0:17:35.114,0:17:55.091
because of the word that we use [br]in space, but it's only a part of all.

0:17:55.091,0:18:10.547
We usually obsess over somebody else, [br]if we like that person.

0:18:10.547,0:18:19.176
And we want to make that person behave [br]the way we want them to behave.

0:18:19.176,0:18:25.595
So if they don't behave [br]accordingly then we feel bitter.

0:18:25.595,0:18:36.585
And if that disappointment becomes [br]too much then we just let go,

0:18:36.585,0:18:42.840
and we become indifferent to them.

0:18:42.840,0:18:54.780
If we realize this concept of emptiness

0:18:54.780,0:19:00.586
then we can actually [br]let go of our obsession.

0:19:00.586,0:19:08.155
Then we can allow him or her [br]to behave as they want.

0:19:08.155,0:19:12.155
If they ask for our help, [br]then we help.

0:19:12.155,0:19:17.405
If they don't ask for help, [br]then we don't help.

0:19:17.405,0:19:29.395
So we're neither indifferent [br]in this case nor obsessive.