WEBVTT 00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:01.434 (upbeat music) 00:00:01.434 --> 00:00:02.127 [DR. BRETT JONES] Hey. 00:00:02.134 --> 00:00:04.175 Today I'm gonna answer the question, 00:00:04.175 --> 00:00:06.544 "What's the difference between self-efficacy, 00:00:06.544 --> 00:00:09.418 self-concept, and self-esteem?" 00:00:09.418 --> 00:00:11.701 I'm here at the Citi Open tennis tournament, 00:00:11.701 --> 00:00:14.345 because I want you to think about how your self-efficacy, 00:00:14.345 --> 00:00:15.915 for serving in tennis, 00:00:15.915 --> 00:00:18.703 can be different from your tennis self-concept, 00:00:18.703 --> 00:00:21.674 which can be different from your athletic self-concept, 00:00:21.674 --> 00:00:23.585 your academic self-concept, 00:00:23.585 --> 00:00:25.352 and your overall self-esteem. 00:00:26.020 --> 00:00:28.174 Let's go back to Virginia Tech to find out how these 00:00:28.174 --> 00:00:30.845 self-beliefs contribute to your sense of self. 00:00:32.598 --> 00:00:35.607 This video is part of the Ed Psych Insight series, 00:00:35.607 --> 00:00:38.372 in which I explain educational psychology concepts. 00:00:38.555 --> 00:00:42.632 (buzzer buzzing) 00:00:43.529 --> 00:00:45.100 [INTERVIEWER] How good are you at tennis? 00:00:45.100 --> 00:00:47.446 [DR. BRETT JONES] At tennis, on a zero to ten scale, 00:00:47.446 --> 00:00:48.823 I would say about a seven. 00:00:48.823 --> 00:00:51.399 I'm pretty good, but not great. 00:00:51.399 --> 00:00:52.956 [INTERVIEWER] How good are you at baseball? 00:00:53.483 --> 00:00:55.348 [DR. BRETT JONES] Baseball is not my best sport. 00:00:55.348 --> 00:00:56.305 I'm not too bad. 00:00:56.305 --> 00:00:58.693 I would say, probably a three. 00:00:59.197 --> 00:00:59.767 (bell chiming) 00:00:59.871 --> 00:01:01.364 [INTERVIEWER] How good are you at football? 00:01:01.691 --> 00:01:03.264 [DR. BRETT JONES] Well I'm a pretty good wide receiver. 00:01:03.264 --> 00:01:07.061 I mean, compared to guys on the Virginia Tech Football team, 00:01:07.061 --> 00:01:11.557 I'm probably a two or three but, compared to guys my age, 00:01:11.557 --> 00:01:14.410 I'm probably like a eight, or nine. 00:01:14.410 --> 00:01:16.102 I'm fast, and I catch the ball. 00:01:16.102 --> 00:01:17.566 (upbeat instrumental music) 00:01:18.626 --> 00:01:20.994 How you rate your ability in different domains, 00:01:21.015 --> 00:01:22.680 is called your self-concept. 00:01:23.238 --> 00:01:25.545 Self-concept is about your ability, 00:01:25.794 --> 00:01:28.879 which is also referred to as your competence, 00:01:28.879 --> 00:01:31.253 or your level of knowledge and skills in a domain. 00:01:31.772 --> 00:01:33.323 In the videos you just saw, 00:01:33.394 --> 00:01:36.275 I rated my self-concept as a seven in tennis, 00:01:36.383 --> 00:01:39.839 a three in baseball, and a two or eight in football, 00:01:39.972 --> 00:01:42.150 depending on who I was comparing myself to. 00:01:42.899 --> 00:01:44.339 So the first key point, 00:01:44.534 --> 00:01:47.150 is that our self-concepts are multi-dimensional, 00:01:47.453 --> 00:01:49.012 because we can have different ratings, 00:01:49.012 --> 00:01:50.464 for different self-concepts. 00:01:51.132 --> 00:01:52.366 A second key point, 00:01:52.550 --> 00:01:55.064 is that our self-concept in a particular domain, 00:01:55.307 --> 00:01:56.988 such as tennis or football, 00:01:57.458 --> 00:02:00.740 can vary depending on who we're comparing ourselves to. 00:02:01.714 --> 00:02:03.939 My rating is much lower when I compare myself 00:02:03.939 --> 00:02:05.507 to a Division One football player, 00:02:05.928 --> 00:02:08.626 than when I compare myself to an average guy my age. 00:02:09.360 --> 00:02:10.615 A third key point, 00:02:10.875 --> 00:02:13.432 is that our self-concepts are hierarchical, 00:02:13.896 --> 00:02:16.186 because they are comprised of broader, 00:02:16.186 --> 00:02:18.123 and narrower self-concepts. 00:02:18.693 --> 00:02:21.003 Here, you can see that my tennis, baseball, 00:02:21.003 --> 00:02:22.486 and football self-concepts, 00:02:22.718 --> 00:02:24.891 are part of my athletic self-concept, 00:02:25.259 --> 00:02:27.821 which is part of my physical self-concept. 00:02:28.686 --> 00:02:31.145 I also have other physical self-concepts, 00:02:31.421 --> 00:02:34.989 such as an attractiveness self-concept, and others. 00:02:35.933 --> 00:02:37.923 In fact, if we were to expand this, 00:02:38.167 --> 00:02:40.550 we would see that we have many self-concepts, 00:02:40.959 --> 00:02:43.734 such as an academic self-concept, 00:02:44.134 --> 00:02:46.594 that's comprised of self-concepts in science, 00:02:46.594 --> 00:02:49.683 math, writing,and other domains. 00:02:50.960 --> 00:02:52.167 So to summarize, 00:02:52.280 --> 00:02:55.134 self-concept is your perception of your competence, 00:02:55.134 --> 00:02:59.464 in a particular domain, such as academics, athletics, or tennis. 00:03:00.186 --> 00:03:02.480 Now, let's define self-efficacy. 00:03:03.134 --> 00:03:06.080 [INTERVIEWER] How confident are you that you can make a serve? 00:03:06.550 --> 00:03:08.095 [DR. BRETT JONES] On a ten-point scale, 00:03:08.095 --> 00:03:10.000 I would say seven. 00:03:11.143 --> 00:03:13.172 The question, "How confident are you, 00:03:13.172 --> 00:03:14.923 that you can do a specific activity?" 00:03:15.234 --> 00:03:17.177 is asking about self-efficacy. 00:03:17.725 --> 00:03:20.603 Self-efficacy is your confidence that you can complete 00:03:20.603 --> 00:03:22.691 a specific activity within a domain. 00:03:23.123 --> 00:03:24.086 In the video, 00:03:24.269 --> 00:03:26.664 I rated my confidence that I could hit a serve, 00:03:26.810 --> 00:03:29.221 as a seven on a ten-point scale. 00:03:30.064 --> 00:03:31.672 But I also have self-efficacies, 00:03:31.672 --> 00:03:33.929 related to solving double-digit addition problems, 00:03:34.318 --> 00:03:36.453 and making friends in biology class. 00:03:37.280 --> 00:03:40.992 So while self-efficacy focuses on a specific activity, 00:03:41.286 --> 00:03:45.261 self-concepts, are your broader perceptions of your abilities, 00:03:45.261 --> 00:03:46.248 within the domain, 00:03:46.678 --> 00:03:49.232 and are likely informed by your self-efficacies. 00:03:49.911 --> 00:03:52.502 For example, your math self-concept, 00:03:52.626 --> 00:03:55.147 would likely be higher if your self-efficacy 00:03:55.147 --> 00:03:57.761 for solving double-digit addition problems was high, 00:03:58.204 --> 00:03:59.237 and vice versa. 00:04:00.178 --> 00:04:02.877 But if you were in high school, your math self-concept 00:04:02.877 --> 00:04:05.085 would also be informed by your self-efficacy, 00:04:05.085 --> 00:04:08.045 in solving algebra, and geometry problems. 00:04:08.560 --> 00:04:10.060 So as you can see, 00:04:10.060 --> 00:04:12.334 we have a lot of perceptions about ourselves. 00:04:13.498 --> 00:04:15.664 One reason that self-efficacy is important, 00:04:15.959 --> 00:04:18.329 is that it tends to correlate with performance. 00:04:18.923 --> 00:04:21.612 For example, someone with a higher self-efficacy, 00:04:21.612 --> 00:04:23.194 for hitting a successful serve, 00:04:23.805 --> 00:04:26.318 would be more likely to perform higher when serving. 00:04:26.800 --> 00:04:28.156 Let's test this out. 00:04:29.475 --> 00:04:31.913 I rated my self-efficacy as a seven, 00:04:32.453 --> 00:04:33.626 so I will estimate, 00:04:33.686 --> 00:04:35.940 that I should make seven out of ten serves. 00:04:36.080 --> 00:04:38.448 It probably doesn't work exactly like that, 00:04:38.664 --> 00:04:41.871 but it makes sense that a fairly high self-efficacy rating, 00:04:41.988 --> 00:04:45.330 should lead to a fairly-high percentage of successful serves. 00:04:46.480 --> 00:04:50.351 Okay, so now we're gonna test this out by hitting in, 00:04:50.363 --> 00:04:53.715 ten balls, into the service court on the other side, 00:04:53.869 --> 00:04:56.339 and we'll find out how many I can actually make 00:04:56.339 --> 00:05:00.008 out of ten balls on one take, no re-dos. 00:05:00.172 --> 00:05:00.891 (Dr. Brett chuckling) 00:05:04.020 --> 00:05:05.015 (buzzer buzzing) 00:05:07.974 --> 00:05:08.907 (bell chiming) 00:05:11.619 --> 00:05:12.675 (buzzer buzzing) 00:05:15.388 --> 00:05:16.123 (bell chiming) 00:05:19.210 --> 00:05:20.010 (bell chiming) 00:05:22.711 --> 00:05:23.334 (bell chiming) 00:05:26.213 --> 00:05:27.042 (bell chiming) 00:05:29.420 --> 00:05:30.475 (buzzer buzzing) 00:05:33.062 --> 00:05:33.821 (bell chiming) 00:05:36.197 --> 00:05:36.831 (bell chiming) 00:05:36.831 --> 00:05:39.832 (triumphant instrumental music) 00:05:40.388 --> 00:05:43.983 Okay, so my performance was exactly as I predicted. 00:05:44.778 --> 00:05:47.128 Although by adolescence, and into adulthood, 00:05:47.128 --> 00:05:49.379 people become pretty good at estimating their ability 00:05:49.379 --> 00:05:50.545 to complete activities. 00:05:50.880 --> 00:05:52.777 Young children are not very good at it, 00:05:53.097 --> 00:05:55.309 and they tend to overestimate their abilities. 00:05:55.680 --> 00:05:58.542 Now that you know about self-efficacy, and self-concept, 00:05:58.804 --> 00:06:00.615 let's talk about self-esteem. 00:06:01.289 --> 00:06:03.547 Self-esteem is an emotional reaction, 00:06:03.547 --> 00:06:06.773 to your overall evaluation of yourself as a person of worth. 00:06:07.304 --> 00:06:10.177 Basically, it's how you feel about yourself overall. 00:06:10.950 --> 00:06:13.542 These feelings are affected by how good you are, 00:06:13.549 --> 00:06:14.615 at what you value. 00:06:15.270 --> 00:06:18.516 So, for example, if you value academics more than physical, 00:06:18.516 --> 00:06:19.605 and social abilities, 00:06:19.950 --> 00:06:23.016 and you have a low academic self-concept, 00:06:23.557 --> 00:06:25.356 then you'll have a lower self-esteem, 00:06:25.698 --> 00:06:29.037 even if you have high physical and social self-concepts. 00:06:30.049 --> 00:06:32.721 Similarly, you may feel great about yourself, 00:06:32.721 --> 00:06:34.902 if you have a high academic self-concept, 00:06:35.280 --> 00:06:38.339 even if you have low physical and social self-concepts, 00:06:38.516 --> 00:06:39.923 if you don't value those. 00:06:40.605 --> 00:06:41.761 As you can see, 00:06:41.973 --> 00:06:46.147 our self-esteem depends on being good at the things we value. 00:06:46.943 --> 00:06:49.231 So what's the difference between self-efficacy, 00:06:49.231 --> 00:06:51.177 self-concept, and self-esteem? 00:06:51.705 --> 00:06:52.821 Well, to summarize, 00:06:53.015 --> 00:06:56.188 self-efficacy is your confidence in your ability to complete 00:06:56.188 --> 00:06:59.514 a specific activity, such as a math problem. 00:06:59.985 --> 00:07:02.249 Your self-concepts are your perceptions, 00:07:02.249 --> 00:07:04.313 about how good you are in various domains, 00:07:04.548 --> 00:07:08.419 such as math, tennis or romantic relationships. 00:07:08.923 --> 00:07:10.053 And self-esteem, 00:07:10.215 --> 00:07:12.914 includes your feelings about your overall evaluation 00:07:12.914 --> 00:07:15.083 of yourself, as a person of worth. 00:07:15.554 --> 00:07:18.437 And your self-esteem is affected by what you value. 00:07:19.760 --> 00:07:20.767 As a final point, 00:07:21.032 --> 00:07:24.079 self-efficacy can be changed relatively quickly 00:07:24.079 --> 00:07:26.356 if the activity doesn't take too long to learn. 00:07:26.946 --> 00:07:28.743 For example, someone's self-efficacy 00:07:28.743 --> 00:07:30.545 for solving double-digit addition problems, 00:07:30.961 --> 00:07:33.354 could be increased a lot in a few hours, 00:07:33.354 --> 00:07:34.394 if they knew how to add, 00:07:34.572 --> 00:07:36.378 but didn't know how to add double digits 00:07:36.378 --> 00:07:37.626 in the problem shown here. 00:07:38.513 --> 00:07:40.148 Of course, it would take longer, 00:07:40.148 --> 00:07:42.329 maybe even several months, or a year 00:07:42.530 --> 00:07:45.174 to increase someone's math self-concept 00:07:45.593 --> 00:07:47.186 if they didn't believe that they were good at math, 00:07:47.186 --> 00:07:47.971 to begin with. 00:07:48.677 --> 00:07:51.442 And because self-esteem is dependent on self-concept, 00:07:51.934 --> 00:07:54.672 it would likely take more time to change someone's self-esteem 00:07:54.672 --> 00:07:55.172 as well. 00:07:55.977 --> 00:07:58.034 The main differences identified in this video, 00:07:58.118 --> 00:07:59.632 are summarized in this table, 00:07:59.967 --> 00:08:01.991 and you can pause the video to review them. 00:08:03.601 --> 00:08:06.587 If you found this video helpful, make sure to leave a like, 00:08:06.587 --> 00:08:08.876 and subscribe to my channel for more videos. 00:08:09.298 --> 00:08:11.675 More information about this topic is available 00:08:11.675 --> 00:08:12.508 at my website, 00:08:12.513 --> 00:08:14.886 and in the 'Essentials of Educational Psychology' book, 00:08:15.341 --> 00:08:17.221 which are linked in the description below. 00:08:17.679 --> 00:08:18.642 Thanks for watching! 00:08:18.642 --> 00:08:20.016 (upbeat instrumental music) 00:08:20.016 --> 00:08:21.841 [INTERVIEWER] How good are you at quarterback? 00:08:22.219 --> 00:08:23.530 [DR. BRETT JONES] Well, compared to the Virginia Tech 00:08:23.530 --> 00:08:25.637 quarterback, I'm probably like a nine or ten. 00:08:25.637 --> 00:08:26.206 [COMMENTATOR] Here we go! 00:08:26.206 --> 00:08:27.328 Sorry drumline!