0:00:00.150,0:00:01.230 - [David] All right, readers, 0:00:01.230,0:00:03.360 I wanna talk about choosing text evidence 0:00:03.360,0:00:04.683 to support a claim. 0:00:05.760,0:00:07.680 Readers have to do this all the time. 0:00:07.680,0:00:09.720 You come across a question that asks you 0:00:09.720,0:00:12.930 for the best text[br]evidence to prove a point. 0:00:12.930,0:00:14.340 You've got a passage in front of you. 0:00:14.340,0:00:16.710 Maybe it's a thousand words,[br]maybe it's a paragraph, 0:00:16.710,0:00:18.210 but you have to support a claim 0:00:18.210,0:00:21.300 using the best text[br]evidence you can muster. 0:00:21.300,0:00:24.365 Let's get to our main[br]example for this video, 0:00:24.365,0:00:27.300 which let me just warn you up top 0:00:27.300,0:00:30.150 is a pretty spicy topic, okay? 0:00:30.150,0:00:32.790 A real friendship ender. You ready? 0:00:32.790,0:00:34.740 Deep breath. Here we go. 0:00:34.740,0:00:36.300 Defining question of our time. 0:00:36.300,0:00:39.087 Is a tomato a fruit or a vegetable? 0:00:39.087,0:00:41.850 It sounds silly, but this[br]fully went to the Supreme Court 0:00:41.850,0:00:44.610 of the United States in 1893. 0:00:44.610,0:00:48.480 Nix versus Hedden was the name[br]of the case. Some background. 0:00:48.480,0:00:52.390 An 1883 law imposed[br]heavy taxes on vegetables 0:00:52.390,0:00:55.350 imported from other[br]countries, but not fruit. 0:00:55.350,0:00:57.988 Now, scientifically speaking,[br]tomatoes are fruits. 0:00:57.988,0:00:59.430 They grow out of a flower 0:00:59.430,0:01:01.230 and they've got seeds on the inside. 0:01:01.230,0:01:04.080 This is the argument that[br]John Nix brought to the court. 0:01:04.080,0:01:07.975 If a tomato is a fruit, you[br]can't tax it as a vegetable. 0:01:07.975,0:01:09.660 Now in his decision, 0:01:09.660,0:01:12.610 Supreme Court Justice Horace Gray wrote, 0:01:12.610,0:01:16.050 "Botanically speaking, tomatoes[br]are the fruit of a vine 0:01:16.050,0:01:19.350 just as are cucumbers[br]squashes, beans and peas. 0:01:19.350,0:01:21.870 But in the common language of[br]the people, whether sellers 0:01:21.870,0:01:23.520 or consumers of provisions, 0:01:23.520,0:01:26.670 all these are vegetables which[br]are grown in kitchen gardens 0:01:26.670,0:01:29.010 and which whether eaten cooked or raw, 0:01:29.010,0:01:31.620 are like potatoes,[br]carrots, parsnips, turnips, 0:01:31.620,0:01:33.960 beets, cauliflower, cabbage,[br]celery, and lettuce, 0:01:33.960,0:01:37.860 usually served at dinner in[br]with or after the soup, fish 0:01:37.860,0:01:40.590 or meats, which constitute the[br]principle part of the repast 0:01:40.590,0:01:43.440 and not, like fruits[br]generally, as dessert." 0:01:43.440,0:01:46.410 And what's a repast? It's an[br]old fashioned word for meal. 0:01:46.410,0:01:49.293 So the principle part of a[br]repast is the main course 0:01:49.293,0:01:50.670 of a meal. 0:01:50.670,0:01:53.640 Which evidence from[br]this text best supports 0:01:53.640,0:01:56.520 the court's claim that[br]tomatoes are vegetables? 0:01:56.520,0:01:59.610 And we'll just make it easy,[br]pare it down to three choices. 0:01:59.610,0:02:02.520 Which of these three[br]best supports that claim 0:02:02.520,0:02:04.631 that tomatoes equal vegetables? 0:02:04.631,0:02:09.393 Pause the video here and discuss. 3, 2, 1. 0:02:09.393,0:02:11.976 (bright music) 0:02:23.340,0:02:25.020 Okay, and we're back. 0:02:25.020,0:02:27.030 Let's break down some of the evidence 0:02:27.030,0:02:28.452 that Justice Gray uses. 0:02:28.452,0:02:30.157 In this first one here, 0:02:30.157,0:02:33.420 "Tomatoes are the fruit of a[br]vine, just as are cucumbers, 0:02:33.420,0:02:35.114 squashes, beans and peas." 0:02:35.114,0:02:37.980 That sounds like it's[br]acknowledging the counterargument. 0:02:37.980,0:02:40.050 That's saying, "Okay, technically 0:02:40.050,0:02:42.990 tomatoes are botanically fruit." 0:02:42.990,0:02:45.810 So while that may strengthen[br]the overall argument, 0:02:45.810,0:02:48.030 because then you can swerve back around 0:02:48.030,0:02:49.590 and say "That's true, but, 0:02:49.590,0:02:51.000 there's this even stronger evidence." 0:02:51.000,0:02:53.190 This evidence does not support the claim 0:02:53.190,0:02:54.390 that tomatoes are vegetables. 0:02:54.390,0:02:57.393 In fact, it says the opposite.[br]So let's cross that out. 0:02:58.470,0:03:01.140 Second one, "In the common[br]language of the people, 0:03:01.140,0:03:02.880 these are vegetables." 0:03:02.880,0:03:05.640 That's kind of a "Because[br]I said so" argument. 0:03:05.640,0:03:07.830 What's the data that undergirds that? 0:03:07.830,0:03:09.510 Which people? How many people? 0:03:09.510,0:03:10.343 And does the fact 0:03:10.343,0:03:12.960 that people believe a thing make it true? 0:03:12.960,0:03:14.400 People saying these plants are vegetables, 0:03:14.400,0:03:17.550 doesn't really prove that[br]they're vegetables, right? 0:03:17.550,0:03:20.400 Nevertheless, this is stronger[br]than "Tomatoes are fruit." 0:03:20.400,0:03:21.930 I'd call this relevant evidence. 0:03:21.930,0:03:24.210 It does provide some[br]support for the claim, 0:03:24.210,0:03:26.760 but is it the best evidence? 0:03:26.760,0:03:28.687 Let's look at the last piece. 0:03:28.687,0:03:30.810 "Whether eaten cooked or raw, 0:03:30.810,0:03:33.450 vegetables are usually served at dinner, 0:03:33.450,0:03:36.180 and not like fruits[br]generally, as dessert." 0:03:36.180,0:03:39.090 So this last one is all about[br]that big list of vegetables, 0:03:39.090,0:03:41.160 including tomatoes that[br]are served for dinner 0:03:41.160,0:03:43.440 and not for dessert like a fruit would be. 0:03:43.440,0:03:45.780 This is a cultural[br]definition of a vegetable, 0:03:45.780,0:03:47.713 a question of how the food item is used, 0:03:47.713,0:03:51.780 which is even stronger than[br]what the food item is called. 0:03:51.780,0:03:54.510 I think this is our best evidence. 0:03:54.510,0:03:58.272 People use tomatoes like[br]vegetables when they eat them, 0:03:58.272,0:04:00.440 so they're vegetables. 0:04:00.440,0:04:01.980 Good job. Option three. 0:04:01.980,0:04:03.900 You are the best. 0:04:03.900,0:04:04.890 In your own writing, 0:04:04.890,0:04:06.690 when you need to find supporting evidence 0:04:06.690,0:04:08.250 for an argument that you're making, 0:04:08.250,0:04:10.140 look for those strong examples 0:04:10.140,0:04:12.990 that are directly linked[br]to the claim you're making. 0:04:12.990,0:04:15.599 Keep it as brief and as direct as you can. 0:04:15.599,0:04:20.310 Claim. My sister picked up a[br]package for me when I was out. 0:04:20.310,0:04:23.615 Evidence. My doorbell camera[br]captured her doing that. 0:04:23.615,0:04:25.920 I have every confidence[br]that you'll be able 0:04:25.920,0:04:28.860 to find the best text[br]evidence for your claims. 0:04:28.860,0:04:31.560 And my evidence for that[br]is you taking the time 0:04:31.560,0:04:33.025 to learn With me today. 0:04:33.025,0:04:34.980 You can learn anything. 0:04:34.980,0:04:35.813 David, out.