I really want to ask like as a mental as an investor.
How, what would be the
Elements for you, to choose somebody to work with.
Let's say that personality that proactive talk to you.
Yeah.
Okay.
By far the single most important thing is teachability, will they?
Listen if someone who might know more of them says some should be different?
I guarantee you virtually every investor.
I know if you come across as stubborn or unwilling to change your views in the face of maybe someones informed opinion, it's over, nothing's going to happen.
It makes perfect sense too.
Whether you're in school or work, even playing a game, was somebody, you know, if you're really stubborn and it has to be your way and I say my way or the highway, it doesn't work that way.
It's not how the world works.
Community's function through cooperation not through having a position sticking to it.
No matter what, that's the biggest thing, then after that, you want to see, are they clear and concise about again, the problem they're trying to solve in the solution, they think will solve it.
Uh, what is the demand like in the market?
How much do people really want this problem solved the competitors?
Who else is doing it?
It's unlikely that nobody else is trying to solve the problem.
You're trying to solve because there's so many people doing so many things, a lot of folks, think no one else is doing this.
If I hear that it's over because I guarantee you just because you just, you don't know about it just because you don't know about it.
Doesn't mean it isn't happening.
A lot of things happen in stealth and you're never going to know until it comes to Market.
So you should always assume others are doing it.
You have to be on, you have to be the best.
At what you're trying to do to survive the threat, they might represent.
And then I would say the clarity about how realistic are you about the actual process involved in, developing Your solution.
That's the start to finish.
So it's problem.
You're trying to solve the solution, you're trying to do with, who else is doing it?
What's the qualification of the team that you've assembled around you even if it's just you and then how much time and money and risk will it involve to get to some some stage of?
Here's what we're trying to do.
We think it works well enough.
Please give it a try.
Do some beta testing, get the feedback and improve it and then get ready to release.
I feel like what we, I what we normally call a coachable, right?
Exactly, same thing, same thing.
Yeah, gotcha, boys.
My sister become more like a brother because sometimes it's not about right or wrong.
It is about like, let's open another perspective and right?
It was something about it if not why we need to be here together, right?
So if have, if someone gives some perspective or have you to have another perspective, let's do something about it to test it out and co-create that Journey, right, so it's really two things.
Is someone willing to listen to somebody else's opinion?
And are they willing to admit?
They don't know what all the cells.
That's a big, that's a big one.
That's a lot.
We call it all a lot of out there.
Even I've been accused of being a know at all but I think that's wrong.
Yeah.
I just feel like it is same.
Maybe the same as but I would look at it as somebody who parties.
Think be honest enough for with themselves to know that where they are now and what they want to do and whether they want to go and then there's somebody who called The Journey with them and they want to make the best out of that instead of sticking to the previous patterns.
There are, otherwise there's no reason to actually having somebody else to co-create the journey.