0:00:06.896,0:00:09.429 I want to start with a warning today. 0:00:10.619,0:00:15.296 I realize that beginning with a warning[br]may not be the smartest thing to do, 0:00:15.296,0:00:16.827 but I'm just going to go for it. 0:00:16.827,0:00:21.397 My warning is that although I'm here[br]to talk to you about communications, 0:00:21.397,0:00:24.715 I actually have zero training[br]in communications, 0:00:25.275,0:00:27.096 and I've never worked in PR. 0:00:27.096,0:00:28.208 What I am 0:00:28.208,0:00:30.768 is a psychological anthropologist. 0:00:31.488,0:00:35.436 And what I study is the way[br]that culture influences how we think, 0:00:36.396,0:00:39.737 how we process information,[br]how we make meaning of messages, 0:00:39.737,0:00:43.534 and how we formulate[br]and come to decisions. 0:00:44.227,0:00:49.037 And so, as a psychological anthropologist,[br]one of my goals here today 0:00:49.037,0:00:52.129 is to convince you,[br]is to show you, that this ... 0:00:53.297,0:00:54.627 is not true. 0:00:54.627,0:00:56.247 (Laughter) 0:00:56.247,0:00:59.668 That we should not be actively[br]dissuading our friends and colleagues 0:00:59.668,0:01:01.950 from going into anthropology,[br] 0:01:01.950,0:01:07.050 and that instead, studying culture[br]and how people use it to think 0:01:07.050,0:01:09.977 is an incredibly valuable tool[br]in the real world, 0:01:09.977,0:01:11.768 and for our purposes today, 0:01:11.768,0:01:15.917 can be an incredibly important[br]and effective thing 0:01:15.917,0:01:18.737 in being a better communicator. 0:01:19.397,0:01:23.128 And so, as an anthropologist[br]working in communications, 0:01:23.738,0:01:25.918 I study two different things. 0:01:25.918,0:01:28.509 First of all, I study public thinking, 0:01:28.509,0:01:29.999 not public opinion, 0:01:29.999,0:01:33.538 not the way that people answer a couple[br]of polling questions here or there, 0:01:33.538,0:01:35.698 or conduct themselves[br]in a few focus groups 0:01:35.698,0:01:38.149 in Cleveland or Kansas City - 0:01:38.149,0:01:40.718 I'm from Cleveland,[br]I can make that joke, that's okay - 0:01:40.718,0:01:46.179 but rather how people use culture[br]in a deep and highly predictable way 0:01:46.179,0:01:50.279 to think about complex social issues;[br]issues like education or mental health, 0:01:50.279,0:01:55.568 immigration or aging,[br]climate change or race inequity. 0:01:56.109,0:01:59.518 So I am really excited[br]to talk to you about ... 0:02:01.098,0:02:05.188 how culture helps us[br]be more effective communicators. 0:02:05.710,0:02:08.089 The other thing that I'm going[br]to talk to you about 0:02:08.089,0:02:11.159 is how through the way[br]that we present information 0:02:11.159,0:02:16.119 we can get people to open up[br]an access dramatically different ways 0:02:16.119,0:02:21.489 of thinking, of feeling, and of acting[br]about those social issues, 0:02:21.489,0:02:24.611 and in a nutshell,[br]that is what framing is: 0:02:24.611,0:02:27.790 how variations in the way[br]that we present information 0:02:27.790,0:02:33.510 can lead people to dramatically different[br]perceptual and behavioral outcomes. 0:02:33.510,0:02:36.709 And so I'm really, really - why not? - 0:02:36.709,0:02:42.190 really excited to get the chance[br]to geek out about framing today. 0:02:42.190,0:02:44.260 And I'll tell you[br]right from the beginning 0:02:44.260,0:02:47.500 that geeking out about framing[br]is pretty much my all-time, 0:02:47.500,0:02:49.499 absolute favorite thing to do, 0:02:50.169,0:02:54.479 which I realize is kind of pathetic,[br]and probably a little bit sad. 0:02:54.479,0:02:57.571 But it does mean that at least[br]one person in this room 0:02:58.241,0:03:00.190 is going to have fun during this talk. 0:03:00.190,0:03:01.218 (Laughter) 0:03:01.218,0:03:03.440 That will be me, I will have fun. 0:03:04.040,0:03:07.373 And so, what I want to do today[br]is to convince you, is to argue 0:03:07.373,0:03:09.753 that even though you do not[br]think of yourselves 0:03:09.753,0:03:11.510 all the time in this way 0:03:11.510,0:03:15.820 and are not explicitly aware of it,[br]you are all communicators. 0:03:16.520,0:03:20.461 And as communicators,[br]framing matters a great deal to you. 0:03:20.461,0:03:25.751 So what I want to do is give you[br]two reasons why framing matters to you. 0:03:26.341,0:03:30.110 And the first reason is, [br]unfortunately, I'm in the position 0:03:30.110,0:03:32.791 where I have to tell you[br]that you all have a problem. 0:03:32.791,0:03:35.533 And you should know there aren't[br]11 more steps after this, 0:03:35.533,0:03:39.040 it's not that kind of a meeting,[br]and it's not that kind of a problem. 0:03:39.040,0:03:41.862 What I mean is that you have[br]a communications problem. 0:03:41.862,0:03:44.122 You have a problem of perception. 0:03:44.481,0:03:47.199 And the problem looks something like this: 0:03:47.199,0:03:50.012 That you all have been in positions,[br]at one time or another, 0:03:50.012,0:03:53.661 where you think you have the most perfect, 0:03:54.391,0:03:56.454 awesome, slam-dunk - 0:03:56.454,0:03:58.478 whatever sports metaphor you want to use - 0:03:58.478,0:04:01.342 way of talking about[br]what you do and why it matters. 0:04:01.342,0:04:03.722 Heck, it works with two of your[br]closest colleagues, 0:04:03.722,0:04:06.992 what could go wrong[br]when it goes out to normal people, 0:04:06.992,0:04:10.682 people who don't eat and breathe[br]and sleep your issues all the time? 0:04:10.682,0:04:13.741 And you find that when this idea [br]that made so much sense to you 0:04:13.741,0:04:16.791 goes outside of your immediate circle,[br]it does one of two things. 0:04:16.791,0:04:19.204 First of all, it lacks resonance. 0:04:19.204,0:04:22.972 It doesn't have grip,[br]it goes in one ear and out the other. 0:04:22.972,0:04:26.453 Secondly, probably more unfortunately[br]because it happens more frequently, 0:04:26.453,0:04:30.822 that thing which worked[br]and was so brilliant in your own head 0:04:30.822,0:04:31.853 goes out, 0:04:31.853,0:04:37.003 and it has the exact opposite effect[br]on the people you're trying to persuade, 0:04:37.003,0:04:39.333 on the people you're trying[br]to communicate with. 0:04:39.333,0:04:44.272 And I'm not going to ask you to take[br]my word for anything today, right? 0:04:44.272,0:04:48.213 I'm going to show you evidence[br]from the research that I do with my team 0:04:48.213,0:04:49.442 that shows this. 0:04:49.442,0:04:52.002 And I have a lot of pieces of examples, 0:04:52.002,0:04:55.862 evidence of this you-say-they-think,[br]this lost-in-translation effect. 0:04:55.862,0:04:59.293 I'm going to show you one today[br]that comes from some work that we've done 0:04:59.293,0:05:02.733 to translate the science[br]of early childhood development. 0:05:03.203,0:05:07.972 People who are in this field,[br]people who are developmental scientists, 0:05:07.972,0:05:11.265 really want to talk[br]about adversity and stress, 0:05:11.265,0:05:14.363 and the effects that stress and adversity[br]can have on young kids. 0:05:14.363,0:05:16.192 And they say things like this: 0:05:16.192,0:05:18.373 that persistent stress[br]can derail development 0:05:18.373,0:05:21.354 and have negative long-term effects[br]on health and well-being. 0:05:21.354,0:05:25.254 And if you're a developmental scientist,[br]you replace negative with deleterious 0:05:25.254,0:05:27.354 because that's the way you talk. 0:05:27.354,0:05:29.374 And so for folks who are in this field, 0:05:29.374,0:05:30.554 this is true. 0:05:31.214,0:05:34.594 There is an incredibly[br]deep body of science 0:05:34.594,0:05:37.743 across a number of disciplines[br]which supports this point. 0:05:38.334,0:05:41.624 Unfortunately,[br]when you take this idea out, 0:05:41.624,0:05:44.004 to normal people,[br]to members of the general public, 0:05:44.004,0:05:46.585 you get things[br]that look and sound like this: 0:05:46.984,0:05:49.544 (Video) Man:[br]Life's hard. Supposed to be hard. 0:05:49.544,0:05:53.424 What doesn't kill you makes [br]you stronger, you know? 0:05:53.424,0:05:55.524 All the bad cliches you can think of. 0:05:55.524,0:06:01.554 There's been people that have come[br]from absolutely nothing to make it, 0:06:02.094,0:06:05.794 and in society's eyes gained success. 0:06:05.794,0:06:08.915 Nat Kendall-Taylor:[br]So just to make it really crystal-clear, 0:06:09.545,0:06:12.975 that which you just heard[br]was not the intended effect 0:06:12.975,0:06:16.035 when this expert opened[br]his or her mouth to deliver this message. 0:06:16.035,0:06:18.706 I'm not trying to say[br]that our friend Nietzsche here 0:06:18.706,0:06:21.576 with "what doesn't kill you [br]makes you stronger" - 0:06:21.576,0:06:23.856 smart audience, there you go - 0:06:23.856,0:06:26.124 is wrong or stupid in any way. 0:06:26.124,0:06:28.514 But there's clearly something[br]that's going on here, 0:06:28.514,0:06:29.864 there's clearly a difference[br] 0:06:29.864,0:06:32.504 between the intention[br]and the delivery of the message, 0:06:32.504,0:06:35.416 and it's actual perception and effect. 0:06:35.416,0:06:38.006 And you all should have a good idea[br]as to what that is, 0:06:38.006,0:06:41.086 based on how I introduced myself[br]as an anthropologist. 0:06:41.086,0:06:45.005 So the thing that stands between[br]the you-say and the they-think here is ... 0:06:45.735,0:06:46.946 culture. 0:06:47.716,0:06:50.875 Not the external, Indiana Jones[br]artifact kind of culture, 0:06:50.875,0:06:53.056 but rather culture in mind, 0:06:53.056,0:06:56.236 culture as a set[br]of shared patterns of thinking, 0:06:56.236,0:07:00.256 as a set of shared assumptions[br]and propositions that we have 0:07:00.256,0:07:02.296 and carry around with us in our minds, 0:07:02.296,0:07:05.846 and use every time[br]that we are presented with information, 0:07:05.846,0:07:08.386 every time that we engage with an issue. 0:07:08.386,0:07:10.256 And so, what this does, 0:07:10.256,0:07:15.236 this realization that culture[br]is always mediating our meaning 0:07:15.236,0:07:18.786 and complicating our job[br]as communicators, is it gives us - 0:07:18.786,0:07:21.807 so this is both, kind of[br]one of these paradoxical things 0:07:21.807,0:07:26.116 that's both utterly common sense,[br]and completely game-changing - 0:07:26.116,0:07:28.196 is that this gives us[br]a really different way 0:07:28.196,0:07:30.136 of looking at what has been 0:07:30.136,0:07:33.647 the dominant way of thinking about[br]public understanding and communication. 0:07:33.647,0:07:36.267 So for a long time,[br]and still too this day, 0:07:36.267,0:07:38.897 people have thought[br]of public understanding in this way: 0:07:38.897,0:07:43.556 as an empty receptacle,[br]as a blank slate, as an empty fishbowl, 0:07:43.556,0:07:48.125 and have thought that we as communicators[br]can assume that we are our audiences, 0:07:48.125,0:07:50.727 and take the things[br]that make so much sense to us, 0:07:50.727,0:07:53.156 and literally drop them[br]into this unfettered space 0:07:53.156,0:07:54.928 where they get to do their thing. 0:07:54.928,0:07:57.808 And we know, based on[br]what I've just told you about culture, 0:07:57.808,0:07:59.634 that this is neither correct, 0:07:59.634,0:08:03.758 nor is it productive as a way[br]to think about communications. 0:08:03.758,0:08:04.718 Instead, 0:08:04.718,0:08:09.027 we have to understand that culture always[br]complicates our job as communicators, 0:08:09.027,0:08:10.937 and if we can go a step further 0:08:10.937,0:08:14.769 and understand how people use culture[br]to think about our issues, 0:08:14.769,0:08:17.207 we can be dramatically more effective 0:08:17.207,0:08:21.287 in our roles as messengers,[br]in our roles as communicators. 0:08:21.837,0:08:26.928 And so, the second reason why framing[br]matters to all of you in this room 0:08:26.928,0:08:31.090 is because understanding [br]is frame dependent. 0:08:31.570,0:08:35.318 Now, that's a mildly[br]academicese way of saying 0:08:35.318,0:08:38.798 that the choices that you make[br]as communicators matter. 0:08:38.798,0:08:40.198 Sometimes the little things: 0:08:40.198,0:08:42.688 the pronouns that you use,[br]the verbs that you choose; 0:08:42.688,0:08:44.349 sometimes the big things, 0:08:44.349,0:08:47.542 the values that you use[br]to explain why your issue matters; 0:08:47.542,0:08:48.945 those things matter. 0:08:48.945,0:08:51.149 Those things have[br]frequently dramatic impacts 0:08:51.149,0:08:53.309 on what people are willing to do, 0:08:53.309,0:08:56.328 and how people are willing to act[br]and engage on your issues. 0:08:56.328,0:08:58.748 And again, I don't want you[br]to take my word for it. 0:08:58.748,0:09:00.538 I'm going to give you a quick example[br] 0:09:00.538,0:09:03.029 that shows you that understanding[br]is frame dependent. 0:09:03.029,0:09:06.059 And this example comes[br]not from the United States, 0:09:06.059,0:09:08.718 but from the Canadian province of Alberta. 0:09:09.348,0:09:10.759 And a quick geography lesson, 0:09:10.759,0:09:14.359 Alberta is one of the tall, skinny ones[br]in the middle of the country. 0:09:14.359,0:09:17.689 Kind of all you need to know -[br]it's very cold - for this example. 0:09:17.689,0:09:21.031 And so there's a group of experts [br]and advocates in Alberta 0:09:21.031,0:09:24.849 who are working to change [br]policy and practice around addiction. 0:09:24.849,0:09:27.191 They're working to take[br]what we know from science, 0:09:27.191,0:09:30.471 and use it to implement better policies[br]and practices around addiction 0:09:30.471,0:09:31.530 in this province. 0:09:31.530,0:09:34.489 And they've been having[br]a great deal of difficulty doing this. 0:09:34.819,0:09:36.961 A lot of their problem comes from the fact[br] 0:09:36.961,0:09:39.771 that there is zero support[br]to do anything different 0:09:39.771,0:09:41.901 when it comes to addiction[br]in this province. 0:09:41.901,0:09:44.860 And so, they came to us,[br]and they asked us to conduct some work 0:09:44.860,0:09:48.170 to figure out how to engage[br]members of the public more productively, 0:09:48.170,0:09:49.491 to move understanding, 0:09:49.491,0:09:53.450 and specifically, to increase support[br]for a set of evidence-based policies. 0:09:53.450,0:09:56.200 And so, as good framing geeks and dweebs, 0:09:56.200,0:09:58.311 we do what good framing geeks[br]and dweebs do, 0:09:58.311,0:09:59.741 we ran an experiment. 0:10:00.241,0:10:05.016 And in this experiment[br]we tested three different values messages. 0:10:05.016,0:10:08.951 You see, the values messages[br]along the horizontal axis of this graph 0:10:08.951,0:10:10.141 right now. 0:10:10.141,0:10:12.411 So some people -[br]this is a large experiment, 0:10:12.411,0:10:16.291 6,000 people, which believe it or not[br]is not the entire population of Alberta, 0:10:17.001,0:10:20.134 it's a representative sample,[br]not an exhaustive sample. 0:10:20.134,0:10:24.762 Each of these 6,000 people is randomly[br]assigned to one of these messages. 0:10:24.762,0:10:27.291 So if some folks got the value [br]of interdependence, 0:10:27.291,0:10:28.891 which, in this case, is the sense 0:10:28.891,0:10:32.361 that we need to do a better job[br]of dealing with addiction in this province 0:10:32.361,0:10:33.752 because we're all connected: 0:10:33.752,0:10:36.452 what influences one of us[br]influences all of us. 0:10:36.452,0:10:38.821 Other folks got this value of ingenuity, 0:10:38.821,0:10:42.923 which is an innovation value, that we are[br]a province of problem-solvers - 0:10:42.923,0:10:45.222 you kind of swing your arm[br]when you do this one - 0:10:45.222,0:10:48.192 there's never been a problem[br]that we haven't been able to solve 0:10:48.192,0:10:49.761 with some good old Albertan grit 0:10:49.761,0:10:52.184 and roll-up-your-sleeves[br]problem-solvingness - 0:10:52.184,0:10:55.562 that was my Albertan accent,[br]if you caught that, very important. 0:10:55.562,0:10:58.922 And other folks, last but not least,[br]got this value of empathy, 0:10:58.922,0:11:01.252 which is the sense that we need[br]to do a better job 0:11:01.262,0:11:03.262 of dealing with addiction in this province 0:11:03.262,0:11:05.802 because people who deal with[br]addiction are people too. 0:11:05.802,0:11:09.081 They could be our mother, brother,[br]father, sister, neighbor, whomever, 0:11:09.081,0:11:12.062 and as individuals, we need to show[br]these folks compassion. 0:11:12.062,0:11:14.761 So what you're going to see[br]on this next click 0:11:14.761,0:11:18.832 is what I think are three beautiful,[br]blue bars appearing on this screen, 0:11:18.832,0:11:21.152 and what those blue bars[br]are going to show you 0:11:21.152,0:11:24.852 is the extent, the degree[br]to which hearing these different values 0:11:24.852,0:11:28.412 changes people's support[br]for these evidence-based policies. 0:11:28.412,0:11:30.432 So can anyone do a good drumroll? 0:11:30.432,0:11:33.024 Please, play along, thank you. 0:11:33.024,0:11:34.803 (Drumroll) 0:11:34.803,0:11:38.593 So you should see three blue bars[br]and notice two things. 0:11:38.593,0:11:41.789 So first of all, two of these values,[br]interdependence and ingenuity, 0:11:41.789,0:11:44.734 make people, to a statistically[br]significant degree, 0:11:44.734,0:11:47.873 more supportive of these[br]evidence-based policies. 0:11:47.873,0:11:50.833 That is good news[br]when we run these experiments, 0:11:50.833,0:11:52.483 and when we get results like that, 0:11:52.483,0:11:54.494 we stand up, we do[br]a little framing dance - 0:11:54.494,0:11:56.404 I won't do it right now, don't worry - 0:11:56.404,0:11:59.744 we sit back down and we look[br]towards the right-hand side of the screen. 0:11:59.744,0:12:01.163 The value of empathy 0:12:01.163,0:12:04.203 is actually depressing[br]people's support for these policies. 0:12:05.223,0:12:08.213 Now, the kicker is[br]that in a subsequent piece of analysis, 0:12:08.213,0:12:11.882 where we looked at all of the fields[br]external-facing materials, 0:12:11.882,0:12:16.675 guess which value we found[br]to be in place over 90% of the time? 0:12:17.533,0:12:18.383 Empathy. 0:12:18.383,0:12:20.262 Thank you. Not a rhetorical question. 0:12:20.262,0:12:24.024 And so, what this field has been doing[br]for a very long time is endorsing a value 0:12:24.024,0:12:26.265 which actually drives support down[br] 0:12:26.265,0:12:28.465 for the very policies[br]that they are advocating. 0:12:28.465,0:12:30.604 So this example does two things: 0:12:30.604,0:12:34.434 it clearly shows you that understanding[br]is frame-dependent and frames matter. 0:12:34.434,0:12:38.144 It also shows you that these questions,[br]you know, which values to use, 0:12:38.144,0:12:40.215 how to communicate,[br]are empirical questions. 0:12:40.215,0:12:44.135 We don't have to guess or use our guts,[br]we can use social science. 0:12:44.755,0:12:46.274 I think it's pretty cool 0:12:46.274,0:12:49.915 that frames are able to move people's[br]understanding and their policy support, 0:12:49.915,0:12:53.565 but what about more intrinsic,[br]subconscious thinking? 0:12:53.925,0:12:55.705 What about implicit bias? 0:12:55.705,0:12:59.915 Can frames make people [br]less subconsciously biased 0:12:59.915,0:13:01.922 against particular groups of people? 0:13:01.922,0:13:06.336 So we set out to answer this question[br]through a project on re-framing aging 0:13:06.336,0:13:08.837 in which we were[br]specifically interested in: 0:13:08.837,0:13:13.856 can frames make people less[br]implicitly biased against older adults? 0:13:13.856,0:13:15.265 And we found two things. 0:13:15.265,0:13:19.726 First of all, Americans do not[br]like older people. 0:13:20.937,0:13:23.517 Older Americans don't like older people. 0:13:23.517,0:13:24.796 (Laughter) 0:13:24.796,0:13:26.436 High degree of implicit bias, 0:13:26.436,0:13:28.006 and it's a level of implicit bias 0:13:28.006,0:13:30.176 that parallels other biases[br]that people study, 0:13:30.176,0:13:34.896 whether that's gender,[br]religion, sexuality, race; 0:13:34.896,0:13:37.626 this is not cool news, not a good finding. 0:13:37.626,0:13:40.066 But it does get cool[br]when you look at what happens 0:13:40.066,0:13:42.056 when we gave people a message 0:13:42.056,0:13:45.875 that compared ageing to a process[br]of building and gaining momentum. 0:13:45.875,0:13:47.418 And when we did this, 0:13:47.418,0:13:52.477 we found that we could actually reduce[br]people's implicit bias by almost a third. 0:13:52.477,0:13:53.686 Through a frame,[br] 0:13:53.686,0:13:58.466 we could make people less ageist[br]at an implicit level. 0:13:58.466,0:14:01.368 And you can tell[br]that I think this is pretty cool, 0:14:01.368,0:14:04.066 and it's definitely evidence [br]that frames matter, 0:14:04.066,0:14:07.516 and it's definitely evidence[br]that understanding is frame dependent. 0:14:07.516,0:14:12.727 So I want to leave you with a quote,[br]one of my new favorite quotes. 0:14:12.727,0:14:15.667 This is from Austrian[br]philosopher Ivan Illich, 0:14:15.667,0:14:18.327 and Illich says that neither[br]revolution nor reformation 0:14:18.327,0:14:22.379 can ultimately change a society,[br]rather you must tell a more powerful tale, 0:14:22.379,0:14:24.948 one so persuasive[br]that it sweeps away the old myths 0:14:24.948,0:14:27.948 and becomes the preferred story. 0:14:27.948,0:14:33.099 So if we're going to drive social change,[br]we need to develop, we need to test, 0:14:33.099,0:14:36.727 and we need to commit to[br]telling new stories. 0:14:37.207,0:14:41.987 And with that, I will thank you very much,[br]and encourage you all to frame on. 0:14:41.987,0:14:45.038 (Applause)