WEBVTT

00:00:00.962 --> 00:00:02.939
So I have a confession to make.

00:00:03.871 --> 00:00:05.795
I only recently learned how to drive.

00:00:06.960 --> 00:00:08.355
And it was really hard.

00:00:09.328 --> 00:00:11.694
Now, this wasn't an older brain thing.

00:00:12.440 --> 00:00:14.641
Do you remember what it was like
when you first learned how to drive?

00:00:15.221 --> 00:00:18.271
When every decision you made
was so conscious and deliberate?

00:00:19.412 --> 00:00:22.412
I'd come home from my lessons
completely wiped out mentally.

00:00:23.612 --> 00:00:27.092
Now, as a cognitive scientist,
know that this is because

00:00:27.092 --> 00:00:30.245
I was using a lot of something
called executive function.

00:00:31.581 --> 00:00:36.946
Executive function is our amazing ability
to conciously control our thoughts,

00:00:36.946 --> 00:00:38.750
emotions and actions

00:00:38.750 --> 00:00:40.796
in order to achieve goals ...

00:00:40.796 --> 00:00:42.175
like learning how to drive.

00:00:43.190 --> 00:00:46.214
It's what we use when we need
to break away from habit,

00:00:46.214 --> 00:00:47.658
inhibit our impulses

00:00:47.658 --> 00:00:48.565
and plan ahead.

00:00:49.899 --> 00:00:52.096
But we can see it most clearly
when things go wrong.

00:00:53.384 --> 00:00:56.509
Like, have you ever accidentally poured
orange juice on your cereal?

00:00:57.103 --> 00:00:58.784
(Laughter)

00:00:59.009 --> 00:01:00.806
Or, ever start scrolling on Facebook

00:01:00.806 --> 00:01:02.618
and suddenly realize
you've missed a meeting?

00:01:04.405 --> 00:01:05.730
Or maybe this one's more familiar:

00:01:05.730 --> 00:01:08.737
ever plan to stop at the store
on the way home from work

00:01:08.737 --> 00:01:11.059
and then drive all the way home
instead on autopilot?

00:01:11.543 --> 00:01:12.610
(Laughter)

00:01:13.774 --> 00:01:15.868
These things happen to everyone.

00:01:16.221 --> 00:01:18.251
And we usually call it absent-mindedness,

00:01:18.251 --> 00:01:19.330
but what's really happening

00:01:19.330 --> 00:01:22.072
is we're experiencing a lapse
in executive function.

00:01:23.779 --> 00:01:27.879
So we use executive function every day
in all aspects of our lives.

00:01:28.200 --> 00:01:29.690
And over the past 30 years,

00:01:29.690 --> 00:01:33.450
researchers have found that it predicts
all kinds of good things

00:01:33.450 --> 00:01:35.681
in childhood and beyond,

00:01:35.681 --> 00:01:40.247
like social skills, academic achievement,
mental and physical health,

00:01:40.247 --> 00:01:41.151
making money,

00:01:41.151 --> 00:01:42.267
saving money

00:01:42.267 --> 00:01:43.881
and even staying out of jail.

00:01:44.480 --> 00:01:45.964
Sounds great, doesn't it?

00:01:46.494 --> 00:01:47.865
So it's no surprise

00:01:47.865 --> 00:01:51.422
that researchers like me are so interested
in understanding it

00:01:51.422 --> 00:01:53.416
and figuring out ways to improve it.

00:01:55.440 --> 00:02:00.217
But lately, executive function has become
a huge self-improvement buzzword.

00:02:01.214 --> 00:02:04.602
People think you can improve it
through brain-training iphone apps

00:02:04.602 --> 00:02:05.969
and computer games,

00:02:05.969 --> 00:02:09.181
or by practicing it in a specific way
like playing chess.

00:02:10.452 --> 00:02:13.499
And researchers are trying
to train it in the lab

00:02:13.499 --> 00:02:16.313
in the hopes of improving it
and other things related to it,

00:02:16.313 --> 00:02:17.480
like intelligence.

00:02:19.487 --> 00:02:20.987
Well, I'm here to tell you

00:02:20.987 --> 00:02:24.120
that this way of thinking
about executive function is all wrong.

00:02:24.973 --> 00:02:28.500
Brain training won't improve
executive function in a broad sense

00:02:28.500 --> 00:02:31.748
because it involves exercising it
in a narrow way,

00:02:31.748 --> 00:02:35.932
outside of the real-world contexts
in which we actually use it.

00:02:37.070 --> 00:02:39.696
So you can master that executive function
app on your phone,

00:02:39.696 --> 00:02:43.190
but that's not going to help you stop
pouring OJ on your cereals twice a week.

00:02:43.829 --> 00:02:44.831
(Laughter)

00:02:45.088 --> 00:02:47.306
If you really want to improve
your executive function

00:02:47.306 --> 00:02:49.374
in a way that matters for your life,

00:02:49.374 --> 00:02:53.328
you have to understand
how it's influenced by context.

00:02:54.403 --> 00:02:55.570
Let me show you what I mean.

00:02:55.872 --> 00:02:57.989
There's a great test
that we use in the lab

00:02:57.989 --> 00:03:00.533
to measure executive function
in young children

00:03:00.533 --> 00:03:02.985
called the Dimensional Change Card Sort.

00:03:04.148 --> 00:03:07.425
In this task, kids have to sort
cards in one way --

00:03:07.425 --> 00:03:09.153
like by shape --

00:03:09.153 --> 00:03:11.287
over and over until they build up a habit.

00:03:12.094 --> 00:03:14.199
And then they're asked to switch,

00:03:14.199 --> 00:03:16.990
and sort the same cards in another way,

00:03:16.990 --> 00:03:18.658
like by color.

00:03:19.363 --> 00:03:22.069
Now, really young kids struggle with this.

00:03:22.520 --> 00:03:25.898
Three and four-year-olds will usually
keep sorting the cards in the old way

00:03:25.898 --> 00:03:29.209
no matter how many times you remind them
of what they should be doing.

00:03:30.431 --> 00:03:31.525
(Video) Woman: If it's blue put it here,

00:03:31.525 --> 00:03:32.392
if it's red put it here.

00:03:32.753 --> 00:03:33.598
Here's a blue one.

00:03:35.355 --> 00:03:37.240
OK, so now we're going to play
a different game.

00:03:37.525 --> 00:03:39.207
We're not going to play
the color game anymore.

00:03:39.590 --> 00:03:41.408
Now we're going to play the shape game,

00:03:41.408 --> 00:03:42.408
and in the shape game,

00:03:42.408 --> 00:03:43.700
all the stars go here

00:03:43.700 --> 00:03:45.806
and all the trucks go here, OK?

00:03:46.333 --> 00:03:48.194
Stars go here, trucks go here.

00:03:48.462 --> 00:03:49.818
Where do the stars go?

00:03:51.028 --> 00:03:51.968
And where do the trucks go?

00:03:52.485 --> 00:03:53.198
Excellent.

00:03:53.391 --> 00:03:55.770
OK, starts go here, trucks go here.

00:03:56.067 --> 00:03:57.067
Here's a truck.

00:03:58.766 --> 00:04:00.376
(Laughter)

00:04:00.775 --> 00:04:02.444
Stars go here, trucks go here.

00:04:02.795 --> 00:04:05.214
Here's a star.

00:04:05.475 --> 00:04:07.196
(Laughter)

00:04:07.834 --> 00:04:09.719
SB: So it's really compelling

00:04:09.719 --> 00:04:13.016
and it's really obvious when she fails
to use her executive function.

00:04:13.799 --> 00:04:15.068
But here's the thing,

00:04:15.068 --> 00:04:17.807
we could train her on this task
and others like it

00:04:17.807 --> 00:04:19.940
and eventually, she'd improve.

00:04:20.138 --> 00:04:22.265
But that means she would've
improved her executive function

00:04:22.265 --> 00:04:23.573
outside of the lab?

00:04:24.414 --> 00:04:27.798
No, because in the real world,
she'll need to use executive function

00:04:27.798 --> 00:04:30.768
to do a lot more than switching
between shape and color.

00:04:31.384 --> 00:04:34.550
She'll need to switch
from adding to multiplying

00:04:34.550 --> 00:04:36.265
or from playing to tidying up.

00:04:36.808 --> 00:04:39.758
Or from thinking about her own feelings
to thinking about her friend.

00:04:40.666 --> 00:04:42.491
And success in real-world situations

00:04:42.491 --> 00:04:45.336
depends on things
like how motivated you are

00:04:45.336 --> 00:04:46.662
and what your peers are doing.

00:04:47.418 --> 00:04:49.234
And it also depends on the strategies

00:04:49.234 --> 00:04:52.097
that you execute when you're using
executive function

00:04:52.097 --> 00:04:53.706
in a particular situation.

00:04:54.905 --> 00:04:58.113
So what I'm saying
is that context really matters.

00:04:59.405 --> 00:05:01.486
Now let me give you an example
from my research.

00:05:02.205 --> 00:05:06.614
I recently brought in a bunch of kids
to do the classic marshmallow test,

00:05:06.614 --> 00:05:08.328
which is a measure of delay
of gratification

00:05:08.328 --> 00:05:11.439
that also likely requires
a lot of executive function.

00:05:12.876 --> 00:05:14.317
So you may have heard about this test,

00:05:14.317 --> 00:05:16.519
but basically, kids are given a choice:

00:05:16.519 --> 00:05:18.949
they can have one marshmallow right away,

00:05:18.949 --> 00:05:21.834
or if they can wait for me to go
to the other room

00:05:21.834 --> 00:05:23.190
and get more marshmallows,

00:05:23.190 --> 00:05:25.069
they can have two instead.

00:05:25.679 --> 00:05:29.364
Now, most kids really want
that second marshmallow,

00:05:29.364 --> 00:05:32.545
but they key question is how
long can they wait?

00:05:33.138 --> 00:05:34.046
(Laughter)

00:05:34.269 --> 00:05:37.651
Now, I added a twist to look
at the effects of context.

00:05:38.949 --> 00:05:42.030
I told each kid that they were in a group,

00:05:42.030 --> 00:05:43.637
like the green group,

00:05:43.637 --> 00:05:46.275
and I even gave them a green
t-shirt to wear.

00:05:46.758 --> 00:05:50.960
And I said, "You're group waited
for two marshmallows,

00:05:50.960 --> 00:05:52.173
and this other group,

00:05:52.173 --> 00:05:53.292
the orange group,

00:05:53.292 --> 00:05:54.383
did not."

00:05:54.689 --> 00:05:56.042
Or I said the opposite:

00:05:56.042 --> 00:05:58.179
"Your group didn't wait
for two marshmallows

00:05:58.179 --> 00:05:59.634
and this other group did."

00:06:00.264 --> 00:06:02.587
And then I left the kid alone in the room

00:06:02.587 --> 00:06:04.998
and I watched on a webcam
to see how long they waited.

00:06:05.902 --> 00:06:10.160
(Laughter)

00:06:10.352 --> 00:06:14.991
So what I found was that kids who believed
that their group waited

00:06:14.991 --> 00:06:16.033
for two marshmallows

00:06:16.033 --> 00:06:18.404
were themselves more likely to wait.

00:06:19.095 --> 00:06:19.779
(Laughter)

00:06:20.267 --> 00:06:24.515
So they were influeced by a peer group
that they'd never even met.

00:06:24.969 --> 00:06:26.192
(Laughter)

00:06:26.387 --> 00:06:27.470
Pretty cool, isn't it?

00:06:27.921 --> 00:06:30.896
Well, so with this result
I still didn't know

00:06:30.896 --> 00:06:34.429
if they were just copying their group
or if it was something deeper than that.

00:06:35.534 --> 00:06:37.271
So I brought in some more kids,

00:06:37.271 --> 00:06:38.588
and after the marshmallow test,

00:06:38.588 --> 00:06:42.236
I showed them pictures of pairs of kids,

00:06:42.236 --> 00:06:45.964
and I told them "one of these kids
likes to have things right away,

00:06:45.964 --> 00:06:47.405
like cookies and stickers.

00:06:47.910 --> 00:06:49.478
And the other kid likes to wait

00:06:49.478 --> 00:06:51.258
so that they can have
more of these things."

00:06:52.080 --> 00:06:53.147
And then I asked them,

00:06:53.147 --> 00:06:55.126
"Which one of these two kids
do you like more?

00:06:55.320 --> 00:06:56.690
And who would you want to play with?"

00:06:57.461 --> 00:06:58.055
(Laughter)

00:06:58.278 --> 00:07:01.873
And what I found was that kids
who believed that their group waited

00:07:01.873 --> 00:07:04.891
tended to prefer other kids
who liked to wait for things.

00:07:06.200 --> 00:07:09.690
So learning what their group did
made them value waiting more.

00:07:10.951 --> 00:07:12.939
And not only that,

00:07:12.939 --> 00:07:15.238
these kids likely used executive function

00:07:15.238 --> 00:07:18.210
to generate strategies
to help themselves wait,

00:07:18.210 --> 00:07:21.907
like sitting on their hands
or turning away from the marshmallow

00:07:21.907 --> 00:07:24.453
or singing a song to distract themselves.

00:07:24.940 --> 00:07:26.537
(Laughter)

00:07:27.813 --> 00:07:31.665
So what this all shows
is just how much context matters.

00:07:32.282 --> 00:07:35.805
It's not that these kids had good
executive function or bad,

00:07:35.805 --> 00:07:38.699
it's that the context
helped them use it better.

00:07:40.702 --> 00:07:44.025
So what does this mean
for you and for your kids?

00:07:44.642 --> 00:07:46.924
Well, let's say that you want
to learn Spanish.

00:07:47.375 --> 00:07:49.077
You could try changing your context

00:07:49.077 --> 00:07:53.016
and surrounding yourself with other people
who also want to learn,

00:07:53.016 --> 00:07:55.524
and even better if these are people
that you really like.

00:07:56.104 --> 00:07:59.273
That way you'll be more motivated
to use executive function.

00:08:00.259 --> 00:08:03.690
Or let's say that you want to help
your child do better on her math homework.

00:08:04.626 --> 00:08:07.767
You could teach her strategies
to use executive function

00:08:07.767 --> 00:08:09.743
in that particulary context,

00:08:09.743 --> 00:08:12.848
like putting her phone away
before she starts studying

00:08:12.848 --> 00:08:16.189
or planning to reward herself
after studying for an hour.

00:08:17.209 --> 00:08:20.002
Now I don't want to make it sound
like context is everything.

00:08:20.569 --> 00:08:25.515
Executive function is really complex
and it's shaped by numerous factors,

00:08:25.515 --> 00:08:27.090
but what I want you to remember

00:08:27.090 --> 00:08:29.664
is if you want to improve
your executive function

00:08:29.664 --> 00:08:31.923
in some aspect of your life,

00:08:31.923 --> 00:08:33.343
don't look for quick fixes.

00:08:34.086 --> 00:08:35.274
Think about the context

00:08:35.274 --> 00:08:37.919
and how you can make your goals
matter more to you.

00:08:38.368 --> 00:08:40.846
And how you can use strategies

00:08:40.846 --> 00:08:42.113
to help yourself
in that particular situation.

00:08:43.485 --> 00:08:46.081
I think the Ancient Greeks said it best

00:08:46.081 --> 00:08:48.364
when they said, "Know thyself."

00:08:48.907 --> 00:08:53.234
And a key part of this is knowing
how context shapes your behavior

00:08:53.234 --> 00:08:56.292
and how you can use that knowledge
to change for the better.

00:08:57.068 --> 00:08:57.942
Thank you.

00:08:58.205 --> 00:09:01.617
(Applause)