WEBVTT

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
- [Christina] The most important thing
that I try to pass on

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
is the sense that economics
is an empirical field,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
then if you get
new empirical evidence,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
you're going to have
to change the way

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
you think about the economy.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
I think being open to that

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
is the most important thing
for a young economist to know.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Economists -- not a group

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
with a lot of Marys,
Natashas or Juanitas,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
and that's caused
a lot of controversy.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
However, what's often overlooked
are the actual female economists

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
who are pushing economics forward

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
by addressing real-world issues.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Welcome to Women in Economics.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
♪ [music] ♪

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
I grew up in a family

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
where public policy
was discussed a lot.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
I was planning to be a lawyer,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
so I was going to major
in Government.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
And as part of the Government
major at my college,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
you had to take
a year of Economics.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
I was about three weeks in,
and I was hooked,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
like the government major's gone,
the lawyer's gone,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
I was in an Economist.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Christina Romer
is a macro economic historian.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
She takes the tools
of modern economics,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
statistics, and data

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
and applies them
to historical questions.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
- [Narrator] Christy's researcher
agenda throughout her career

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
has focused
on a course set of topics

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
about economic fluctuations
and business cycles.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
She's been asking and answering

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
fascinating questions
about our economy,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
starting with her dissertation
as a graduate student at MIT.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
There, she changed
her understanding

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
of how the economy
has grown over time.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
I think the questions
that came to me

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
were about monetary policy
and business cycles

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
and the Great Depression.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
- [Narrator] It was widely believed

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
that government policies led to
less fluctuations and unemployment

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
after World War II.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
However, the data before
World War II was unreliable.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
- [Nancy] But Christy came up
with the ingenious insight

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
that while you couldn't clean up
the historical data,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
you could fuzzy up
the more modern data,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
and that's exactly what she did.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
And when she did it, lo and behold,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
all these differences
basically collapsed.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
- [Narrator] Amazingly,
if she applied

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
the old techniques to the new data,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
the pose WOrld War II economy

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
looked just as volatile
as the pre-World War economy.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
This contradicted the consensus

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
on the role of government
stabilization policies.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Her research rattled
the economic community.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
It made a splash.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
I remember one of the prominent
economist MIT,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
his first reaction was,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
"Well, I'd be very upset
about this if I believed it.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
So I'm not going to believe it."

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Throughout her academic career,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Christine continued to challenge

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
her understanding
of the Great Depression.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
As just one example,
most economists believed

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
the Great Depression ended

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
because of higher
government spending

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
and investment in public works.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
She showed that the impact
of those policies

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
were relatively small compared to

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
the monetary policy
changes taking place.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
- [ ] Starting as soon as Roosevelt
took the US off the gold standard

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
when he took office in 1933,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
over the next decade,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
there's just an enormous increase
in money supply.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
What he showed was that

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
that is what caused
the very rapid growth that we had.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
- [Narrator] Christina's research
has often focused on the effect

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
economic events have
on people's everyday lives.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
- [ ] It's tough to manage to have
new ideas on the same thing

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
again and again and again.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
One of the remarkable things

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
about Christy and David's
research program

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
is that they have done that
very successfully.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
- [Narrator] Over 35 years,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Christina has done
meticulous research,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
frequently, with her collaborator
and husband, David Romer.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
- [David] We'll have her paper,
and I think it's almost done.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
We've worked really hard on it,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
and each do one last read.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
She says, "You know,
I think there's a logical tension

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
between where we end up
in Section 4b

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
and how we set out
what we're going to do in Section 2a.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
And I'm thinking, "Oh,
no one's going to notice."

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
And we spend weeks more
on the paper because she's right.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
And the paper gets much better.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
- [ ] One of the remarkable
things about her work

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
is the coherence that spans
literally her graduate school days

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
and her work on her dissertation,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
and connects up to some
of her most recent work

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
on thinking about
ways of identifying

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
turning points in the economy.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
- [Narrator] Christina's work
would be put to the test

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
during the devasting crash of 2008,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
when the US economy
was in free fall.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
- [Christina] We often
describe the economy

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
as at the edge of a cliff.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Well, the truth is, we're not only
at the edge of a cliff,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
we were headed down.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Financial markets were plunging,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
and the risk of contagion
from the US to the global economy

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
was v ery real.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
- [ ] Even people who'd see a lot

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
were really worried
about what was happening.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Just as the nation was turning
to President-elect Obama

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
to confront the economic crisis,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
a mysterious email
showed up in Christina'a inbox

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
with the subject line:
"Obama Transition."

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
- [ ] And I will take a little bit of credit here

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
because Christina was just about to delete it,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
and I said, "Why don't you at least google fitst."

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
And she discovered that he was the head of the economic side of the transition.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
The Obama administration wanted to meet with Christina as soon as possible.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
- [ ] On the next day, she was on a plane to Chicago to meet with the President-elect.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
- [Narrator] Christina was asked to chair the Council of Economic Advisers.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
The council wa sset up to bring academics into the policy-making process

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
and make recommendations to the President.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
- [Christina] I was taking to Rahm Emanuel, and I said,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
"So tell me again, how did I get this job?"

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
And he said, "You were an expert on the Great Depression,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
and we thought we might need one."

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
- [Janet] She's tried to understand what caused the Depression,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
what ended the Depression,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
what role monitoring and fiscal policy oculd play

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
and no one could be better positioned to know what the right strategy woulf be.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
- [CHristina] We were talking to bankers,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
we were talking to employers,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
we were talking to the people that where collecting the statistics.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
- [Marrator] Christina'a research revealed

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
that the economy was even more of a perilous position

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
than previously thgoutt.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
SHe got on the phone with Obama to give him the bad news.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
- [Christina] Saying, you going, this is terrible.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
We've lost three-quarters of a million jobs.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
I'm just going on like this, and finally he stops me

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
and he said, "Christy, it's not your fault... yet."

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
- [ ] The challenge that CHristy and her team members on the Economic Advisory Team confronted

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
was how large a stimulus the US economy needed

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
in order to right the ship

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
and trying to calibrate that depended critically on the estimates

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
of how much bang for the buck you get

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
when you use fiscal policy as a tool

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
and try to then inflate the economy.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
- [Marrator} CHristina helped design a fiscal package

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
that she thought was necessary to get the economy moving.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
- [Gabriel] The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
is a piece of legislation that was signed in February of 2009,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
and it was a combination of direct government spending,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
so think of repairing highways,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
transfers to State governments,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
transfers to individuals and tax cuts.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
And the rationale for it was for the time when households were spending less

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
and busniesses were spending less --

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
that's a time when it's appropriate for government to spend a little more

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
to fill in that gap.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
The recessions leave long scars,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
and people who lose their jobs during recession

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
and they're unemployed for a while --

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
even ten years later, often are earning less

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
than they were before the recession occurred.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
So by making the case,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
both in acaedemic research, and then as a policymaker,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
the government could do more to mitigate recessions

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
that really has an impact probably hundreds of thousands of people

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
kept their jobs during the Great Recession

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
because hse had become an expert on the behavior of the economy,

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
on the effects of fiscal policy.

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
- [ ] And she was realy passionate about the role that she played

99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
after the financial crisis and the Great Recession