WEBVTT 00:00:00.571 --> 00:00:02.785 - [Instructor] Let's say we're going to trace out a curve 00:00:02.785 --> 00:00:05.159 where our X coordinate and our Y coordinate 00:00:05.159 --> 00:00:07.328 that they are each defined by 00:00:07.328 --> 00:00:10.467 or they're functions of a third parameter T. 00:00:10.467 --> 00:00:13.476 So, we could say that X is a function of T 00:00:13.476 --> 00:00:17.004 and we could also say that Y is a function T. 00:00:17.004 --> 00:00:19.561 If this notion is completely unfamiliar to you, 00:00:19.561 --> 00:00:22.523 I encourage you to review the videos on parametric equations 00:00:22.523 --> 00:00:24.202 on Khan Academy. 00:00:24.202 --> 00:00:25.678 But what we're going to think about 00:00:25.678 --> 00:00:27.758 and I'm gonna talk about in generalities in this video. 00:00:27.758 --> 00:00:29.786 In future videos we're going to be dealing 00:00:29.786 --> 00:00:32.769 with more concrete examples 00:00:32.769 --> 00:00:34.726 but we're gonna think about what is the path 00:00:34.726 --> 00:00:35.858 that is traced out 00:00:35.858 --> 00:00:38.025 from when T is equal to A, 00:00:39.148 --> 00:00:42.188 so this is where we are when T is equal to A, 00:00:42.188 --> 00:00:45.917 so in this case this point would be X of A, 00:00:45.917 --> 00:00:47.000 comma Y of A, 00:00:49.083 --> 00:00:50.055 that's this point 00:00:50.055 --> 00:00:52.603 and then as we increase from T equals A 00:00:52.603 --> 00:00:54.186 to T is equal to B, 00:00:55.818 --> 00:00:59.668 so our curve might do something like this, 00:00:59.668 --> 00:01:02.355 so this is when T is equal to B, 00:01:02.355 --> 00:01:03.224 T is equal to B, 00:01:03.224 --> 00:01:06.087 so this point right over here is X of B, 00:01:06.087 --> 00:01:07.170 comma Y of B. 00:01:08.731 --> 00:01:10.611 Let's think about how do we figure out 00:01:10.611 --> 00:01:12.806 the length of this actual curve, 00:01:12.806 --> 00:01:17.311 this actual arc length from T equals A to T equals B? 00:01:17.311 --> 00:01:18.400 Well, to think about that 00:01:18.400 --> 00:01:20.686 we're gonna zoom in and think about what happens 00:01:20.686 --> 00:01:24.546 when we have a very small change in T? 00:01:24.546 --> 00:01:26.045 So, a very small change in T. 00:01:26.045 --> 00:01:28.616 Let's say we're starting at this point right over here 00:01:28.616 --> 00:01:30.636 and we have a very small change in T, 00:01:30.636 --> 00:01:34.957 so we go from this point to let's say this point 00:01:34.957 --> 00:01:36.803 over that very small change in T. 00:01:36.803 --> 00:01:38.091 It actually would be much smaller than this 00:01:38.091 --> 00:01:39.102 but if I drew it any smaller, 00:01:39.102 --> 00:01:40.487 you would have trouble seeing it. 00:01:40.487 --> 00:01:43.085 So, let's say that that is our very small change 00:01:43.085 --> 00:01:46.752 in our path in our arc that we are traveling 00:01:47.866 --> 00:01:50.179 and so, we wanna find this length. 00:01:50.179 --> 00:01:52.246 Well, we could break it down 00:01:52.246 --> 00:01:54.244 into how far we've moved in the X direction 00:01:54.244 --> 00:01:56.603 and how far we've moved in the Y direction. 00:01:56.603 --> 00:01:58.792 So, in the X direction, 00:01:58.792 --> 00:02:00.490 the X direction right over here, 00:02:00.490 --> 00:02:03.002 we would have moved a very small change in X 00:02:03.002 --> 00:02:04.640 and what would that be equal to? 00:02:04.640 --> 00:02:05.823 Well, that would be the rate of change 00:02:05.823 --> 00:02:08.794 with which we are changing with respect to T 00:02:08.794 --> 00:02:11.963 with which X is changing with respect to T 00:02:11.963 --> 00:02:14.368 times our very small change in T 00:02:14.368 --> 00:02:15.860 and this is a little hand wavy, 00:02:15.860 --> 00:02:17.673 I'm using differential notion 00:02:17.673 --> 00:02:20.002 and I'm conceptually using the idea 00:02:20.002 --> 00:02:23.813 of a differential as an infinitesimally small change 00:02:23.813 --> 00:02:25.731 in that variable. 00:02:25.731 --> 00:02:27.449 And so, this isn't a formal proof 00:02:27.449 --> 00:02:29.011 but it's to give us the intuition 00:02:29.011 --> 00:02:30.898 for how we derive arc length 00:02:30.898 --> 00:02:33.163 when we're dealing with parametric equations. 00:02:33.163 --> 00:02:35.736 So, this will hopefully make conceptual sense 00:02:35.736 --> 00:02:36.868 that this is our DX. 00:02:36.868 --> 00:02:38.184 In fact, we could even write it this way, 00:02:38.184 --> 00:02:42.351 DX/DT, that's the same thing as X prime of T times DT 00:02:43.431 --> 00:02:44.752 and then our change in Y 00:02:44.752 --> 00:02:47.162 is going to be the same idea. 00:02:47.162 --> 00:02:49.686 Our change in Y, our infinitesimally small change in Y 00:02:49.686 --> 00:02:52.117 when we have an infinitesimally small change in T, 00:02:52.117 --> 00:02:53.482 well, you could view that as your rate of change 00:02:53.482 --> 00:02:55.392 of Y with respect to T 00:02:55.392 --> 00:02:57.189 times your change in T, 00:02:57.189 --> 00:02:59.275 your very small change in T 00:02:59.275 --> 00:03:00.588 which is going to be equal to, 00:03:00.588 --> 00:03:03.838 we could write that as Y prime of T DT. 00:03:05.351 --> 00:03:07.816 Now, based on this, what would be the length 00:03:07.816 --> 00:03:12.498 of our infinitesimally small arc length right over here? 00:03:12.498 --> 00:03:15.219 Well, that we could just use the Pythagorean theorem. 00:03:15.219 --> 00:03:18.392 That is going to be the square root of, 00:03:18.392 --> 00:03:20.094 that's the hypotenuse of this right triangle 00:03:20.094 --> 00:03:21.002 right over here. 00:03:21.002 --> 00:03:22.006 So, it's gonna be the square root 00:03:22.006 --> 00:03:24.357 of this squared plus this squared. 00:03:24.357 --> 00:03:26.497 So, it is the square root of, 00:03:26.497 --> 00:03:28.390 I'm gonna give myself a little bit more space here 00:03:28.390 --> 00:03:30.110 because I think I'm gonna use a lot of it, 00:03:30.110 --> 00:03:32.190 so the stuff in blue squared, 00:03:32.190 --> 00:03:36.216 DX squared we could rewrite that as X prime 00:03:36.216 --> 00:03:37.466 of T DT squared 00:03:39.369 --> 00:03:43.536 plus this squared which is Y prime of T DT squared 00:03:47.979 --> 00:03:50.524 and now let's just try to simplify this a little bit. 00:03:50.524 --> 00:03:52.963 Remember, this is this infinitesimally small arc length 00:03:52.963 --> 00:03:54.444 right over here. 00:03:54.444 --> 00:03:58.798 So, we can actually factor out a DT squared, 00:03:58.798 --> 00:04:00.654 it's a term in both of these 00:04:00.654 --> 00:04:02.985 and so, we can rewrite this as, 00:04:02.985 --> 00:04:05.540 let me, so I can rewrite this 00:04:05.540 --> 00:04:07.642 and then write my big radical sign, 00:04:07.642 --> 00:04:10.828 so I'm gonna factor out a DT squared here, 00:04:10.828 --> 00:04:14.224 so we could write this as DT squared 00:04:14.224 --> 00:04:16.391 times X prime of T squared 00:04:19.830 --> 00:04:21.913 plus Y prime of T squared 00:04:26.449 --> 00:04:27.282 and then to be clear 00:04:27.282 --> 00:04:29.850 this is being multiplied by all of this stuff 00:04:29.850 --> 00:04:31.069 right over there. 00:04:31.069 --> 00:04:34.624 Well, now if we have this DT squared under the radical, 00:04:34.624 --> 00:04:35.595 we can take it out 00:04:35.595 --> 00:04:36.910 and so, we will have a DT 00:04:36.910 --> 00:04:40.750 and so, this is all going to be equal to the square root 00:04:40.750 --> 00:04:44.127 of, so the stuff that's still under the radical 00:04:44.127 --> 00:04:47.044 is going to be X prime of T squared 00:04:50.381 --> 00:04:52.464 plus Y prime of T squared 00:04:55.414 --> 00:04:57.522 and now we took out a DT 00:04:57.522 --> 00:04:59.863 and now we took out a DT. 00:04:59.863 --> 00:05:03.029 I could have written it right over here 00:05:03.029 --> 00:05:04.260 but I'm just writing it on the other side, 00:05:04.260 --> 00:05:06.268 we're just multiplying the two. 00:05:06.268 --> 00:05:08.655 So, this is once again just rewriting the expression 00:05:08.655 --> 00:05:12.830 for this infinitesimally small change in arc length. 00:05:12.830 --> 00:05:15.512 Well, what's lucky for us is in calculus 00:05:15.512 --> 00:05:17.856 we have the tools for adding up 00:05:17.856 --> 00:05:21.559 all of these infinitesimally small changes 00:05:21.559 --> 00:05:24.141 and that's what the definite integral does for us. 00:05:24.141 --> 00:05:26.177 So, what we can do if we wanna add up that 00:05:26.177 --> 00:05:27.933 plus that plus that plus that 00:05:27.933 --> 00:05:30.016 and remember, these are infinitesimally small changes. 00:05:30.016 --> 00:05:32.321 I'm just showing them as not infinitesimally 00:05:32.321 --> 00:05:34.284 just so that you can kind of think about them 00:05:34.284 --> 00:05:35.857 but if you were to add them all up, 00:05:35.857 --> 00:05:38.614 then we are essentially taking the integral 00:05:38.614 --> 00:05:40.647 and we're integrating with respect to T 00:05:40.647 --> 00:05:43.862 and so, we're starting at T is equal to A, 00:05:43.862 --> 00:05:46.600 all the way to T is equal to B 00:05:46.600 --> 00:05:50.600 and just like that we have been able to at least 00:05:51.466 --> 00:05:52.932 feel good conceptually 00:05:52.932 --> 00:05:55.522 for the formula of arc length 00:05:55.522 --> 00:05:59.456 when we're dealing with parametric equations. 00:05:59.456 --> 00:06:00.840 In the next few videos 00:06:00.840 --> 00:06:04.224 we'll actually apply it to figure out arc lengths.