< Return to Video

pumping test analysis part2

  • Not Synced
    Speaker: Nay wells are affected by a well
    skin, a low permeability layer that
  • Not Synced
    surrounds the well and causes the drawdown
    in the skin to be less than- er to be
  • Not Synced
    greater than the drawdown that
    would be expected otherwise.
  • Not Synced
    So, we can see this in the, in the sketch.
  • Not Synced
    This line here is the expected drawdown
    using, uh, the Jacob analysis, or
  • Not Synced
    perhaps some other analysis, but as we
    get right in the vicinity of the well, we
  • Not Synced
    see that there's a low permeability zone
    here, and the head goes like so, follows
  • Not Synced
    this dashed line.
  • Not Synced
    And as a result, this is the expected
    drawdown based on our theoretical analysis.
  • Not Synced
    It is using the properties of the aquifer,
    uh, out here away from the well
  • Not Synced
    [stammering] in this region, but in fact
    we observe that the drawdown at the well
  • Not Synced
    is here, so the drawdown is greater, um,
    and that results from the extra headloss
  • Not Synced
    due to the well skin.
  • Not Synced
    So we want to characterize this, and one
    way to characterize it is to use the well
  • Not Synced
    efficiency, which is the ratio of the
    expected drawdown from our theoretical
  • Not Synced
    analysis to the observed drawdown,
    what actually occurs in the field.
  • Not Synced
    So we need a way to calculate what the
    expected drawdown is, and we can do
  • Not Synced
    this with the Jacob analysis.
  • Not Synced
    What I'm showing here is a version of the
    Jacob analysis that's set up to calculate
  • Not Synced
    the head- er I guess this is the drawdown
    here, um, as a- at a particular time.
  • Not Synced
    So, the important thing to recognize is
    right here.
  • Not Synced
    The radial distance that we're using here
    is the radius of the well.
  • Not Synced
    What we used in the previous analysis
    was the radial distance of the monitering
  • Not Synced
    well, where our data were made.
  • Not Synced
    In this case, we need to use the radial-
    the radius of the well itself.
  • Not Synced
    This time here, that's the time, the
    elapsed time, for a data point that we're
  • Not Synced
    gonna use to determine the observed
    drawdown.
  • Not Synced
    The calculation goes like so: we put in
    the observed time and the radius
  • Not Synced
    of the well, and everything else is pretty
    much the same, the s and the t we've
  • Not Synced
    calculated using a monitoring well out
    here in the formation.
  • Not Synced
    The performance here of the monitoring
    well, the head in the monitoring well, is
  • Not Synced
    not effected by the skin, so when we
    calculate TNS from the monitoring well
  • Not Synced
    data, we're getting something that's
    really just affected by the, um,
  • Not Synced
    formation properties.
Title:
pumping test analysis part2
Description:

more » « less
Video Language:
English
Duration:
15:36

English subtitles

Incomplete

Revisions Compare revisions