Yanis Varoufakis and Francesca Albanese on Israel, Palestine and Genocide

[Applause]

[Yanis] Well, Francesca Albanese, the
United Nations rapporteur on Palestine,

it is not only a personal
pleasure to be talking to you today,

but I want to convey

on behalf of our MERA25 friends and
members that are watching this

their appreciation, our joint
appreciation

for everything you've been
doing so courageously

over months and months of
this unfolding genocide,

which will stigmatise humanity
for so many years.

So thank you on behalf of everyone,
not just on my behalf.

Let me ask you, we are
having this conversation now

less than 24 hours after
the announcement, finally

of an agreement between
Hamas and Israel,

to affect a ceasefire.

What are your feelings about this?

[Francesca] I don't know, I don't know.

Really I'm still processing it,

I feel, I feel so happy to see
the Palestinians cheering,

especially the kids are looking forward to
the return of a peaceful normalcy.

This is on the one hand.

I also mean, I also know that for many
Israelis, this is the end of a nightmare.

But is it going to be the end of the
nightmare for the Palestinians?

For the Palestinians, first of all, we are
talking of the Palestinians in Gaza

and people saying, I mean, I was listening
to the outgoing president of the US

saying, oh, now the Palestinians can
return to their homes, to their life.

Yeah where have you been for the
past 15 months President Biden?

For many of them
there are no more houses,

and for many of them the houses,
whatever, even the rubbles will be empty.

The entire, hundreds and hundreds of
families have been exterminated.

And again, the genocide has happened.

I don't know how you feel, Yanis,

but somewhat, something, I say that,
but I'm still processing what it is

something has broken this year.

Again, this was not a war;
this was a genocidal war,

and all these images of all these people,
all these children,

killed, amputated, brutalised, starved,
left in flooded tents, frozen to death.

Yeah, they're still here, so what.

[Yanis] Well, a whole population has
been placed on death row

for the first time
since the Second World War.

But there is also another dimension,
I just had word from the West Bank

that settlers under the cover of the IDF
are attacking villages now.

as we speak!

This is not a ceasefire in Palestine.

It's a ceasefire only in Gaza
from how I understand it.

And remember, the original
idea of Ariel Sharon

was to move out of Gaza

in order to annex and complete
the occupation of the West Bank.

So from your perspective,

the United Nations perspective,
reporting on Palestine,

can you comment on, you know,
what the Gaza ceasefire means

for Jerusalem, for the West Bank
more generally.

[Francesca] Yeah, yeah, Yanis,
you need it,

because as I answered the first question,
I said this is only for Gaza,

there are some striking features
in the agreement.

There is the liberation of, I think
1,700 prisoners; they are all from Gaza.

But what about the thousands of people
who have been kidnapped?

Palestinians who have been kidnapped,
arbitrarily detained, tortured;

this includes children. this includes
journalists and teachers,

professors from the West Bank.

Since the very beginning
I've written about that.

This is why I've said we need to look at
Israel's intent,

in terms of totality of conduct

and totality of crimes against
the totality of the Palestinians

in the totality of the land that Israel
illegally occupies and claims as its own.

Have you heard anyone talking about
withdrawal of Israel's presence,

civilian and military tangible and
intangible, material and immaterial

because this is what the ICJ has asked,
has ordered in July last year

and the General Assembly has given
a deadline to Israel is doing that.

And no one is talking about that,
and this is the point: West Bank.

West Bank is the place where
the colonial erasure is advancing,

through other means and through other
crimes and through other actors.

Because there you have the Israeli army

the settlers, armed settlers,

and now you also have the repression
from the Palestinian Authority,.

[Yanis] It was poignant that you said

that not all the Palestinian hostages
are going to be released,

especially not the ones from West Bank.

And by the way, I'm talking about hostages
so that I can be symmetrical.

There are Israeli hostages and
there are Palestinian hostages.

There are no conflicts or prisoners;
they are hostages;

they are the hostages by an army
of occupation.

My thought, as we were speaking,

my thoughts wandered in the direction
of the family of Marwan Barghouti,

who's been in prison for decades now

precisely because Israel does not
want any leadership to emerge

within the Palestinians that
are representative of the Palestinians

and which can actually
pave the ground for peace.

because Israel does not want peace.

Do you know a white settler colonial
project loaths peace.

I think that Israel somewhat wants peace
as long as it implies the subjugation

of the Palestinians as a temporary
measure toward their erasure.

The plan of this settler colonial project
as it continues

is not the integration of or the weakening
of the indigenous Palestinians

because, as non-Jewish, they have no
place, no belonging in the Jewish State,

this is very clear, and this is the
problem I have with the state of Israel.

It's not the state of Israel per se; it's
how the state of Israel behaves

The state of Israel is quintessentially
as an apartheid state,

I wish it was different.

This has nothing to do with
the Jewish people,

It's about the design to subjugate,
oppress, dominate another people

till annihilation.

And unfortunately Yanis, it's happening;

it has not happened for one reason,
because the Palestinians do not give up.

The Palestinians could have, I mean,
when Rafa was invaded.

I don't know what you think, but
this is my two cents:

when Rafa was invaded in May

till then the push of the army through
evacuation orders and safe zones

had been more southward from the
north to the south.

When Rafa was, when Israel entered Rafa,
it pushed Palestinians east and south

as much as it could and as it saw
that the Palestinians were not moving,

and as it saw that the
pressure was mounting

Then it gave up, and it started pushing.
them to eastward,

um, sorry. westward, westward, not
eastward, westward toward the sea

in an area like Forensic Architecture
has documented

that is totally, totally unsustainable
unlivable.

But the Palestinians have resisted
in the little that remains of their land,

and still they resist in the little,
I mean, not the little,

but in what remains of their land in east
Jerusalem and the rest of the West Bank

or in Israel itself.

But it's very hard, it is, and
if we don't keep the pressure on Israel

it will be harder and harder.

[Yanis] Well, speaking of pressure and
going back to your contribution

as a lawyer and a rapporteur for
the United Nations,

one of the valiant contributions
you've made

was - and I've seen you do this in press
conference after press conference

from one country to the other -

you're taking your own views and beliefs
out of the equation,

and when you talk about genocide
you insist

that this is not a matter of opinion.

Can you speak to you know, is this
genocide from a legal perspective?

Look, I was listening to you and as you
were in introducing your question

I was saying it's something
you put your opinions aside.

This is so true you have not even
an idea of how true it is,

because probably you have not
heard me saying that

but in the beginning, I was not sure.

I mean, I had really superficial back then
understanding of what genocide was

because it's quite a niche.

When I went back to study what
genocide is from a legal point of view

and look looking at the cases and
the Juris Prudence

I realised where my mistake came from.

Is that we tend to associate genocide to
extermination and mass killing

in Rwanda or the Holocaust.

But genocide is something really deeper

and in retrospect,
and then I'll tell you why.

Um, from a legal point of view, I think
that the Palestinian genocide,

the genocide of the Palestinians

is THE textbook of genocide

and as Raz Segal had really
brilliantly put it

because it's what the conceiver of
the term genocide had in mind:

the settler colonial genocide, erasure
of a people annihilation of a people.

Which doesn't mean killing them all,

in fact, in the genocide convention, the
act of, I mean the killing,

is one of five acts.

But Genocide is a crime constituting,
to be made of, the intent to destroy,

in all or in part a national, religious,
racial, or national group as such.

So the group is targeted as such.

And what does constitute genocide?

Several acts of killing members
of the group,

inflicting several mental
and bodily harm,

creating conditions calculated to
bring about the destruction of the group

or also, not even these are
prevention of birth

and transfer of children.

So you see there are genocidal acts

that resonate with settler colonial
genocides like in Canada and Australia,

where the genocide was
primarily carried out

by breaking the bloodline of the
Aboriginal on the one hand,

and then the First Nations and
Métis, etc. in Canada

separating the kids or preventing births.

[Yanis] I'm glad you mentioned
Australia and Canada

and the United States ofcourse.

First Nations peoples, Aboriginals
and so on,

because recently I was in a debate
with a passionate defender

of Israel's right to
implement genocidal policies.

he said to me: "Do you agree, Yanis,
that, expecting of Israel

things that we don't expect of
the great major Democratic

states of the the world, is racist?".

I said, we'll, go on

And he said, "Well, why should
we expect Israel

not to engage in genocidal practices

when the whole of the United
States was essentially

a grand genocide, as was
Canada and Australia? ".

The point, the vile point is
that what do we expect

of the Anglosphere in particular
or Germany?

Think of what Germany did in
Namibia right?

I mean, or Belgium in the Congo,
they practiced genocide,

so why should they, if they retain a
kind of allegiance to their past,

why should the representatives of
these states think of Israel

as doing something out of the
ordinary?.

[Francesca] Why Israel should be
held to a different standard

from the other liberal democracies
born from genocides

or colonial powers that spread genocide,
committed genocide across the world?

different and several answers first of
all because in 194 after
1948, the world enacted a legal framework.
which prohibits genocide, so what was
permitted in
1913 or in the 15th and 16th centuries is
clearly prohibited today, and it's
prohibited to the point that you
you, it's Pro It is genocide to be
prevented, stopped, and punished so Israel
can commit genocide, and in fact it has
committed genocide, but now it will have
to face the
The UN’s Role
consequences,