-
Not Synced
Donald Trump, the American dollar,
and China:
-
Not Synced
What to watch for during 2025.
-
Not Synced
Donald Trump wants to boost exports
-
Not Synced
to bring American jobs back
to the United States
-
Not Synced
and to reduce, to shrink
the American trade deficit.
-
Not Synced
For that. he needs a
lower value of the dollar,
-
Not Synced
for that, he needs a weaker dollar.
-
Not Synced
But at the same time, Donald Trump
wants a strong dollar,
-
Not Synced
and he will not brook any discussion
-
Not Synced
of ending the exorbitant privilege.
the centrality, the hegemony,
-
Not Synced
the dominance of the American dollar
in international transactions.
-
Not Synced
Can Donald Trump possibly
have both?
-
Not Synced
Donald Trump's first problem
Is that the tariffs
-
Not Synced
that he has invested so much
political capital in
-
Not Synced
introducing, announcing,
and advocating for
-
Not Synced
will most likely boost the
value of the dollar, why?
-
Not Synced
Primarily because every time
-
Not Synced
there is global uncertainty
-
Not Synced
whenever there is a problem that
emanates from the United States
-
Not Synced
whether that was the 2008 crisis
-
Not Synced
or whatever crisis there is,
-
Not Synced
there is a paradoxical rush
of foreign money
-
Not Synced
into the United States
boosting the dollar.
-
Not Synced
So if Trump's tariffs
create global uncertainty.,
-
Not Synced
The likely outcome will be
-
Not Synced
an increased value of the dollar
-
Not Synced
and that's his first problem
because if his tariffs
-
Not Synced
succeed in creating a lot of
consternation across the world
-
Not Synced
in China, in the European Union,
in Britain,
-
Not Synced
the result will be that even if
imports initially shrink
-
Not Synced
as a result of these large tariffs,
-
Not Synced
the influx of money into the
United States, of capital
-
Not Synced
is going to boost the
value of the dollar
-
Not Synced
therefore countering whatever effects
the tariffs had on limiting imports
-
Not Synced
and enhancing American exports.
-
Not Synced
Donald Trump's second problem
-
Not Synced
is that if he proceeds with his
very large tax cut
-
Not Synced
especially for corporations
and the oligarchs,
-
Not Synced
the very rich the United States
-
Not Synced
this is also going to attract
into the United States
-
Not Synced
foreign capital
and what will that do?
-
Not Synced
Boost the value of the dollar
-
Not Synced
and therefore enhance the gap between
American savings and investment
-
Not Synced
with investment being much
greater than savings,
-
Not Synced
which is a root cause of
the American trade deficit.
-
Not Synced
Tump's third problem
-
Not Synced
is the exorbitant privilege
of the United States dollar.
-
Not Synced
It is the reason why every time
there is a crisis
-
Not Synced
especially one emanating
from within the United States,
-
Not Synced
the dollar goes up and the
US trade deficit gets worse
-
Not Synced
especially during periods
of reduced demand,
-
Not Synced
jobs and employment
within the United States.
-
Not Synced
So if Donald Trump were serious
-
Not Synced
about shrinking the
American trade deficit,
-
Not Synced
he would want to do away
with the exorbitant privilege
-
Not Synced
of the United States dollar.
-
Not Synced
But of course, not only will he never
allow himself to do that
-
Not Synced
because his best friends, his tribe
are the rentiers
-
Not Synced
and the financiers who
will be aghast
-
Not Synced
if the United States loses the
exorbitant privilege of its dollar.
-
Not Synced
It is highly unlikely that
Donald Trump
-
Not Synced
will want to be the first
American president
-
Not Synced
after the Second World War,
-
Not Synced
that loses the hegemonic power
of the United States
-
Not Synced
by losing the exorbitant privilege
of the United States dollar.
-
Not Synced
Some argue, and I think they
do have a point
-
Not Synced
that maybe, what he's trying to do,
-
Not Synced
what Donald Trump is trying to do
-
Not Synced
is he is threatening the world
-
Not Synced
China and the European Union
in particular,
-
Not Synced
with very large tariffs in order to
-
Not Synced
come to an arrangement with them
-
Not Synced
to accept a depreciation
of the Chinese yuan,
-
Not Synced
of the euro,
of competing currencies
-
Not Synced
in order for the United States
-
Not Synced
to see its exports rise
and its imports diminish.
-
Not Synced
To cut a deal, in other words,
-
Not Synced
something along the lines of what
Ronald Reagan did in 1985.
-
Not Synced
The infamous Plaza Accord,
-
Not Synced
supposedly a multilateral meeting
between the Europeans and the Americans the Canadians the Australians,
-
Not Synced
but in reality, what the Plaza Accord were about, was an ultimatum by Washington on Tokyo
appreciate the yen massively, or else I'm going to slap large tariffs on Japanese exports.
-
Not Synced
The Japanese are all over; they did as they were told the reason why Japan's
massive growth rates between 1950 and 1985 was eliminated, and why Japan lost its verve, its dynamics was because they accepted those Plaza Accords in China
likely to accept a new Plaza Accord?
-
Not Synced
I assign a zero probability to that possibility.
-
Not Synced
China is no Japan.
-
Not Synced
Japan was an occupied country
by the United States.
-
Not Synced
The United States wrote its Constitution there are tens of thousands of American soldiers still occupying Okinawa.
-
Not Synced
China I will repeat this once more, is not Japan.
-
Not Synced
it is highly unlikely that they will accept at a time when the capital
account of China if anything would recommend from an economic point of view
a depreciation of the yuan.
-
Not Synced
They will never accept a massive
appreciation of the kind that would make the difference for the United States
trade deficit
-
Not Synced
in the way that Donald Trump would like this to be pie in the
sky no new Plaza Accord between the United States and Beijing this time are
on the horizon in that sense it looks very unlikely that what Donald Trump
wants.
-
Not Synced
At least, both his objectives of shrinking the US trade deficit and
maintaining the exorbitant privilege of the dollar that both these objectives
will be satisfied at once in 2025 in the next four years.
-
Not Synced
The great question however, for 2025 and beyond, concerns China's dilemma will be whether Beijing will decide to stay put, gaining time until the United States internal contradictions, Trump's conundrum and dilemma plays out, or will Beijing make
the choice that it has not made yet.
-
Not Synced
They have not made up their minds yet.
-
Not Synced
and I reasonably will however, at some point make the choice, make the decision to convert the BRICKS area into a new version of Breton Woods just as Bretton Woods had at its
heart the US dollar for the BRICKS area to have the one at its heart with more
or less fixed exchange rates between the yuan, the rupee and other canes and with a
view to recycle China's surpluses within the BRICKS area because that would be
the greatest and most lethal danger for the exorbitant privilege of the dollar.
-
Not Synced
This is not a decision that has been made as yet well in 2025 or in the years
following 2025 I think we shall know the answer.
-
Not Synced
'Till then, be well.