< Return to Video

The End of Hyper-Threading

  • 0:00 - 0:02
    simultaneous multi-threading
  • 0:02 - 0:05
    a feature that intel calls
    "hyper-threading"
  • 0:05 - 0:08
    has become a real main-stay on
    consumer CPUs
  • 0:08 - 0:12
    hyper-threading allows a single CPU
    core to process two threads at one time
  • 0:12 - 0:16
    and while this isn't quite as powerful
    as just having two physical cores
  • 0:16 - 0:19
    certainly improves performance in many
    applications
  • 0:19 - 0:22
    becoming important enough since it was
    originally introduced in 2002
  • 0:22 - 0:24
    to spread to a huge number of chips
  • 0:24 - 0:28
    as far down as the lower-end Core i3
    series
  • 0:28 - 0:33
    but get this... intel is planning to ditch
    hyper-threading after twenty-two years
  • 0:33 - 0:37
    with the launch of its Lunar Lake and Aero
    Lake processors later this year
  • 0:37 - 0:40
    why would they get rid of what seems like
    such a useful feature?
  • 0:40 - 0:43
    I mean do they not want to beat AMD?
  • 0:43 - 0:45
    A big part of this is the hybrid chip
    design
  • 0:45 - 0:49
    that intel started rolling out with
    their Alder Lake CPUs in 2021
  • 0:49 - 0:52
    instead of having all the cores be
    basically identical
  • 0:52 - 0:55
    Team Blue instead
    gave us "P" or performance cores
  • 0:55 - 0:58
    and "E" or efficiency cores
  • 0:58 - 1:01
    especially important for laptops
    as battery life is of paramount concern
  • 1:01 - 1:04
    and you don't want to waste energy
    putting processes
  • 1:04 - 1:05
    through more power hungry cores
  • 1:05 - 1:08
    if you just don't need the extra
    performance
  • 1:08 - 1:12
    according to Intel, current P cores give
    you about 30% more average throughput
  • 1:12 - 1:14
    when hyper-threading is enabled
  • 1:14 - 1:17
    but at the cost of 20% increase in power
    consumption
  • 1:17 - 1:21
    and even if you're not running off a
    battery, this can matter a great deal
  • 1:21 - 1:22
    in places like data centers
  • 1:22 - 1:26
    where you're trying to move as many
    threads as possible through your chips
  • 1:26 - 1:30
    meaning power consumption becomes an
    important concern and a big cost
  • 1:30 - 1:35
    so how is intel trying to solve this power
    problem without losing that magic
  • 1:35 - 1:37
    hyper-threading performance?
  • 1:37 - 1:39
    we'll give you the answer right after we
    thank Delete Me
  • 1:39 - 1:42
    online privacy isn't just personal it's a
    family matter
  • 1:42 - 1:46
    because of that, Delete Me is now offering
    seamless protection for entire family
  • 1:46 - 1:47
    with their family plans
  • 1:47 - 1:52
    with individual data sheets that tailor to
    each member, their privacy first design
  • 1:52 - 1:56
    ensures personalized removal of personal
    information from online databases
  • 1:56 - 2:01
    from kids to adults, everyone stays safe
    from unwanted exposure and scams
  • 2:01 - 2:03
    simplified management means peace of mind
    for all.
  • 2:03 - 2:06
    so check out delete me at the link below
    and safeguard
  • 2:06 - 2:07
    your family's digital world today
  • 2:08 - 2:12
    although E cores obviously don't have the
    same processing muscle as P cores
  • 2:12 - 2:17
    Intel says its much more efficient to run
    extra threads on those E cores
  • 2:17 - 2:19
    instead of using hyper-threading on P
    cores
  • 2:19 - 2:23
    with the way the operating system
    schedules threads
  • 2:23 - 2:27
    it doesn't invoke hyper-threading until
    all cores, both P and E,
  • 2:27 - 2:31
    have been populated in order to maximize
    power efficiency
  • 2:31 - 2:34
    Intel says that by foregoing
    hyper-threading and instead just having
  • 2:34 - 2:40
    more E cores. You get a 15% increase in
    IPC, that's Instructions Per Clock
  • 2:40 - 2:46
    per unit of power. And a 10% IPC increase
    per unit of die area
  • 2:46 - 2:51
    hyper-threading is still better in terms
    of IPC per die area when you don't have
  • 2:51 - 2:52
    those additional E cores
  • 2:52 - 2:56
    but seeing as Intel seems committed
    to hybrid chip design
  • 2:56 - 3:00
    which also allows them to pack more cores
    onto their CPUs then in the past
  • 3:00 - 3:05
    Team Blue seems confident users won't
    particularly miss hyper-threading
  • 3:05 - 3:09
    remember that the feature was originally
    designed for a CPU that had just one core!
  • 3:09 - 3:12
    Intel's benchmarks back this idea up with
    Lunar Lake
  • 3:12 - 3:16
    beating the previous gen meteor chips
    fairly comfortably despite consuming a
  • 3:16 - 3:18
    similar amount of power
  • 3:18 - 3:21
    of course we'll have to wait and see what
    independent benchmarks
  • 3:21 - 3:23
    say once the chips actually hit the market
  • 3:23 - 3:25
    but the focus on the efficiency isn't
    surprising
  • 3:25 - 3:29
    considering Intel is trying to stay ahead
    of the ARM based offerings from both
  • 3:29 - 3:34
    Apple and Qualcomm, which are touting
    power efficiency as a major selling point
  • 3:34 - 3:37
    but if you really do end up missing
    hyper-threading
  • 3:37 - 3:41
    it could be a great time to invest in a
    really high performance sewing machine
  • 3:41 - 3:43
    a-yo
  • 3:43 - 3:44
    I'm sorry. I'm sorry everyone
  • 3:44 - 3:47
    thanks for watching guys!
    if you liked this video
  • 3:47 - 3:50
    check out this video on another
    type of CPU Intel killed
  • 3:50 - 3:52
    called "Itanium"
  • 3:52 - 3:55
    comment with video suggestions and
    don't forget to subscribe and follow
Title:
The End of Hyper-Threading
Description:

more » « less
Video Language:
English
Duration:
03:56

English subtitles

Revisions Compare revisions