< Return to Video

How to Write a Well-Supported Argument—Video 3 of How to Pass the GED Extended Response

  • 0:00 - 0:03
    Hey, GED test takers. I'm Alice.
  • 0:03 - 0:06
    I passed the GED Reasoning Through Language Arts test,
  • 0:06 - 0:07
    and I'd like to help you pass too.
  • 0:07 - 0:10
    I studied with the "Writing for the GED Test" series
  • 0:10 - 0:12
    from New Readers Press.
  • 0:12 - 0:14
    Practicing with these books boosted my confidence
  • 0:14 - 0:17
    and helped me to write a great extended response.
  • 0:17 - 0:21
    In this video, I'll share some tips from "Writing for the GED Test"
  • 0:21 - 0:24
    that will help you maximize your score on the extended response.
  • 0:24 - 0:27
    In video two, I talked about how to analyze the passages
  • 0:27 - 0:29
    and determine which is stronger.
  • 0:29 - 0:31
    Each passage is an argument,
  • 0:31 - 0:33
    and your response will also be an argument.
  • 0:33 - 0:36
    But... what is an argument?
  • 0:36 - 0:38
    Every argument starts with a claim:
  • 0:38 - 0:41
    a statement saying that something is true.
  • 0:41 - 0:42
    The claim states your position.
  • 0:42 - 0:44
    When you support your claim
  • 0:44 - 0:46
    with reasons and evidence to prove that it is true,
  • 0:46 - 0:48
    you build an argument.
  • 0:48 - 0:49
    But just adding reasons and evidence
  • 0:49 - 0:52
    does not mean you have a convincing argument.
  • 0:52 - 0:56
    As you'll see, you need strong evidence to build a strong argument.
  • 0:56 - 0:58
    Look at the two passages.
  • 0:58 - 1:01
    The prompt asks you to choose the position that is best supported.
  • 1:01 - 1:04
    In video two, I explained how to analyze the evidence
  • 1:04 - 1:06
    and determine which argument is stronger.
  • 1:06 - 1:09
    In the example passages, Mayor Lin says,
  • 1:09 - 1:12
    "The City of Hope Valley needs to be greener."
  • 1:12 - 1:14
    She is in favor of recycling.
  • 1:14 - 1:18
    Mr. Grimley says, "This whole mandatory recycling idea
  • 1:18 - 1:19
    is just plain crazy."
  • 1:19 - 1:22
    He is opposed to mandatory recycling.
  • 1:22 - 1:24
    In your response, you will write about how both authors
  • 1:24 - 1:28
    make their arguments and why one argument is stronger than the other.
  • 1:28 - 1:32
    In the last video, we talked about strong and weak evidence.
  • 1:32 - 1:35
    In addition to using the evidence to determine the stronger position,
  • 1:35 - 1:39
    you will need to discuss this evidence when you write your response.
  • 1:39 - 1:42
    Remember, strong evidence is specific and detailed,
  • 1:42 - 1:44
    cites experts or authorities,
  • 1:44 - 1:46
    quotes statistics or facts,
  • 1:46 - 1:49
    cites recent surveys or study results.
  • 1:49 - 1:52
    Let's look at some specific examples of strong evidence.
  • 1:52 - 1:54
    "Seattle's mandatory recycling program
  • 1:54 - 1:56
    "has been around since 2006,
  • 1:56 - 2:00
    "and statistics show it prevents 400,000 tons of waste
  • 2:00 - 2:02
    from going into landfills each year."
  • 2:02 - 2:07
    Here, authors cite specific data from an ongoing program.
  • 2:07 - 2:11
    "We estimate that Hope Valley can save $10 million in landfill fees,
  • 2:11 - 2:14
    while earning $5 million over the next five years
  • 2:14 - 2:15
    selling its recyclables."
  • 2:15 - 2:18
    The author uses data from the Seattle program
  • 2:18 - 2:22
    to estimate the cost savings and earnings for Hope Valley.
  • 2:22 - 2:25
    And remember that weak evidence may be:
  • 2:25 - 2:27
    vague or unclear,
  • 2:27 - 2:29
    based on opinion instead of facts,
  • 2:29 - 2:31
    from an unreliable source,
  • 2:31 - 2:33
    outdated.
  • 2:33 - 2:37
    Here are some specific examples of weak evidence.
  • 2:37 - 2:39
    "Mandatory recycling is costly."
  • 2:39 - 2:41
    This author writes about high cost
  • 2:41 - 2:44
    but doesn't cite any supporting data.
  • 2:44 - 2:47
    "Mandatory recycling is complicated, waste of time."
  • 2:47 - 2:50
    This is an author's opinion based on his own experience.
  • 2:50 - 2:52
    He doesn't give any facts.
  • 2:52 - 2:54
    In addition to facts and details,
  • 2:54 - 2:57
    authors use reasoning to show a logical connection
  • 2:57 - 2:59
    between their claim and the evidence.
  • 2:59 - 3:02
    Reasoning explains why the evidence validates the claim.
  • 3:02 - 3:05
    For example, "Mandatory recycling will save our city money
  • 3:05 - 3:08
    "because Seattle's program has saved $200 million
  • 3:08 - 3:11
    in landfill dumping fees over the past 15 years."
  • 3:11 - 3:14
    But watch out for faulty reasoning.
  • 3:14 - 3:16
    Faulty reasoning is not logical.
  • 3:16 - 3:18
    It's a sign of a weak argument.
  • 3:18 - 3:21
    Watch out for personal attacks like name calling,
  • 3:21 - 3:23
    or falsely claiming that one action
  • 3:23 - 3:25
    will lead to a series of bad events.
  • 3:25 - 3:27
    That's a "slippery slope."
  • 3:27 - 3:29
    Or, jumping on the bandwagon
  • 3:29 - 3:32
    where "everybody knows," or "everyone believes."
  • 3:32 - 3:33
    "What's next?
  • 3:33 - 3:36
    Mandatory teeth flossing enforced by the tooth fairy?"
  • 3:36 - 3:40
    This is a ridiculous claim with no logical evidence to back it up.
  • 3:40 - 3:42
    Make notes of strong and weak evidence.
  • 3:42 - 3:44
    You will use them when you write your response.
  • 3:44 - 3:46
    Now you know which argument is stronger,
  • 3:46 - 3:50
    and you have gathered the evidence to support your argument.
  • 3:50 - 3:51
    In the next video,
  • 3:51 - 3:54
    I'll show you how to plan and write your response.
  • 3:54 - 3:57
    Remember, you should only spend about 15 minutes
  • 3:57 - 4:00
    reading and analyzing the text and taking notes,
  • 4:00 - 4:03
    so you'll have plenty of time to write your response.
  • 4:03 - 4:05
    Here's a tip to improve your score:
  • 4:05 - 4:08
    choose two or three ideas that have strong evidence
  • 4:08 - 4:09
    and fully explain them
  • 4:09 - 4:11
    to write a well-supported argument.
  • 4:11 - 4:13
    Remember to use your own words.
  • 4:14 - 4:17
    If you want to learn more about or practice analyzing arguments,
  • 4:17 - 4:20
    purchase "Writing for The GED Test," Book 3
  • 4:20 - 4:21
    by New Readers Press.
Title:
How to Write a Well-Supported Argument—Video 3 of How to Pass the GED Extended Response
Description:

more » « less
Video Language:
English
Duration:
04:22

English subtitles

Incomplete

Revisions