< Return to Video

2025-07-03-digital_identity_digital_profiles.mp4

  • 0:01 - 0:04
    DIGITAL IDENTITY AND DIGITAL PROFILES
  • 0:06 - 0:10
    The purpose of this topic
    is to help you create or improve
  • 0:10 - 0:14
    your digital identity
    and manage your digital profiles.
  • 0:16 - 0:21
    Digital identity is what the Internet
    says about us, that is,
  • 0:21 - 0:23
    information about a person on the web,
  • 0:23 - 0:28
    personal data, images,
    records, news or comments.
  • 0:29 - 0:34
    In research, your presence as researchers
    on the Internet and your relationship
  • 0:34 - 0:38
    with other researchers in your field
    is absolutely essential.
  • 0:40 - 0:45
    Those who are starting out in research
    and thus wish to make themselves known,
  • 0:45 - 0:49
    as well as those who have
    been doing so for longer,
  • 0:49 - 0:51
    already know the importance
  • 0:51 - 0:53
    of having an online presence,
  • 0:54 - 0:56
    collaboration or citations.
  • 0:57 - 0:58
    To achieve this,
  • 0:59 - 1:02
    we need a scientific digital identity.
  • 1:03 - 1:06
    The digital identity
    of researchers
  • 1:06 - 1:10
    is also important
    for the visibility of the university
  • 1:10 - 1:15
    in rankings and, therefore,
    for its international prestige.
  • 1:16 - 1:21
    This is related to another
    term called digital reputation,
  • 1:22 - 1:25
    which is the opinion
    or social consideration
  • 1:26 - 1:30
    that other users have
    of a person's online experience.
  • 1:32 - 1:36
    In our field,
    this refers to the level of prestige
  • 1:37 - 1:40
    a researcher has
    within their scientific area.
  • 1:41 - 1:46
    This prestige is obtained
    through the quality and impact
  • 1:46 - 1:49
    of their scientific output
    number of articles,
  • 1:50 - 1:54
    number of citations,
    h-index and other indicators.
  • 1:56 - 2:01
    The more visible they are,
    the easier it is for others to find them
  • 2:01 - 2:05
    and the more likely they are
    to take an interest in our research
  • 2:05 - 2:09
    and, ultimately, cite them,
    which is what we,
  • 2:09 - 2:11
    as researchers, are looking for.
  • 2:13 - 2:16
    In order to build
    a good digital reputation,
  • 2:17 - 2:19
    we need three aspects,
  • 2:20 - 2:21
    which are shown
  • 2:21 - 2:24
    on this slide and which we have called
  • 2:24 - 2:30
    the kit for creating and managing
    a digital researcher identity:
  • 2:31 - 2:35
    academic signature,
    permanent identifier
  • 2:36 - 2:38
    and researcher profiles.
  • 2:40 - 2:44
    Digital identity begins with
    your academic signature,
  • 2:44 - 2:49
    which is how you are identified
    in your publications.
  • 2:50 - 2:54
    This signature is a unique identifying
    element for each researcher.
  • 2:55 - 2:59
    However, a researcher's name
    often appears in different forms,
  • 3:00 - 3:04
    which has a negative effect
    on the impact of publications.
  • 3:05 - 3:09
    Signing each article
    in a different way makes it difficult
  • 3:10 - 3:15
    to locate and compile all of an
    author's bibliography or citations,
  • 3:16 - 3:21
    thereby reducing the impact of their
    scientific output and visibility.
  • 3:22 - 3:28
    It is therefore necessary to
    establish a unique form of identity.
  • 3:29 - 3:32
    The academic signature consists
  • 3:32 - 3:38
    of two parts: the author's name
    and the institutional affiliation,
  • 3:38 - 3:41
    that is, the institution
    to which they belong.
  • 3:42 - 3:47
    Both are essential to ensure
    a researcher's scientific output
  • 3:48 - 3:51
    can be retrieved from different databases
  • 3:51 - 3:57
    and platforms in its entirety
    and without any ambiguity.
  • 3:58 - 4:03
    To decide on our name and see
    how many people have the same name,
  • 4:03 - 4:07
    we can start by doing
    a search on the Internet.
  • 4:08 - 4:12
    To avoid the problems that can arise
    from using different signatures,
  • 4:13 - 4:14
    it is essential
  • 4:15 - 4:20
    to choose a signature that
    sets you apart from other authors
  • 4:20 - 4:23
    with the same name and keep it
    throughout your career.
  • 4:24 - 4:27
    Always sign the same way.
  • 4:28 - 4:30
    Choose a signature format
  • 4:30 - 4:36
    that is interpreted correctly by editors
    and producers of international databases.
  • 4:38 - 4:44
    Make sure you include your institutional
    affiliation always with the same format.
  • 4:46 - 4:47
    The correct reference
  • 4:47 - 4:52
    to the university together
    with the author's name helps
  • 4:52 - 4:56
    to uniquely identify the
    writer of the document.
  • 4:57 - 4:58
    At the same time,
  • 4:58 - 5:01
    standardizing the names of the department,
  • 5:02 - 5:07
    research group and university makes
    it easier for research engines
  • 5:08 - 5:11
    and other scientific
    output evaluation tools
  • 5:11 - 5:15
    to compile the university's
    research output,
  • 5:16 - 5:21
    thereby improving its visibility
    in scientific rankings.
  • 5:23 - 5:30
    Institutional affiliation must include
    the name of the research group,
  • 5:31 - 5:34
    department, university,
    or institute,
  • 5:35 - 5:39
    full official name and/or acronym,
    if commonly used.
  • 5:41 - 5:44
    Institution, full name in official form
  • 5:44 - 5:49
    and optionally acronym, postal address,
  • 5:50 - 5:53
    city and country,
    in the language of your choice.
  • 5:56 - 5:59
    All these elements
    are separated by commas.
  • 6:00 - 6:03
    Example:
    Department of History,
  • 6:04 - 6:05
    Universitat Jaume I,
  • 6:08 - 6:09
    Department of History,
  • 6:10 - 6:13
    comma, Universitat Jaume Primer, comma,
  • 6:14 - 6:16
    Avinguda de Vicent Sos Baynat,
  • 6:17 - 6:20
    comma, s/n, comma,
  • 6:21 - 6:26
    one two zero seven one
    Castello de la Plana, comma, Spain.
  • 6:28 - 6:33
    Failing to standardize
    researchers' names in major databases
  • 6:34 - 6:39
    reduces visibility
    both nationally and internationally,
  • 6:39 - 6:44
    makes it difficult to retrieve
    publications and citations received.
  • 6:47 - 6:49
    Persistent identifiers
  • 6:49 - 6:54
    or author identifiers
    have emerged to solve these problems.
  • 6:55 - 6:59
    Author identifiers
    can be defined as numeric
  • 6:59 - 7:04
    or alphanumeric codes
    assigned to each researcher
  • 7:04 - 7:07
    in order to distinguish them from others
  • 7:07 - 7:11
    and uniquely associate
    their work with them.
  • 7:12 - 7:15
    Examples include ORCID,
  • 7:15 - 7:19
    Open Researcher
    and Contributor ID,
  • 7:19 - 7:23
    and Scopus,
    Author ID.
  • 7:25 - 7:29
    There are many
    researcher identity management systems
  • 7:29 - 7:32
    developed by publishers, libraries,
  • 7:32 - 7:37
    universities, search engines
    and content aggregators
  • 7:38 - 7:41
    with different data models,
    coverage and quality.
  • 7:42 - 7:49
    All efforts to identify researchers
    have converged in the ORCID project.
  • 7:50 - 7:56
    ORCID has become the world's
    only author identifier registry
  • 7:56 - 8:01
    and is now a requirement
    in numerous calls for proposals.
  • 8:03 - 8:08
    ORCID is an open, non profit,
    community-driven project
  • 8:09 - 8:14
    launched in 2012
    that provides a system
  • 8:14 - 8:18
    for the unambiguous identification
    of researchers
  • 8:19 - 8:22
    and a clear method
    for linking research activities
  • 8:23 - 8:26
    and outputs to these identifiers.
  • 8:27 - 8:32
    ORCID provides
    a persistent digital identifier
  • 8:32 - 8:37
    that distinguishes one researcher
    from all the others.
  • 8:37 - 8:43
    The ORCID number
    is an interoperable identifier
  • 8:43 - 8:47
    that remains unique throughout
    a researcher's career.
  • 8:48 - 8:50
    Even if they change universities,
  • 8:51 - 8:56
    the ORCID code always remains
    the same as though it were
  • 8:56 - 8:58
    the researcher's ID number.
  • 8:59 - 9:05
    It is associated with a researcher's
    profile and all their publications,
  • 9:05 - 9:10
    facilitating the exportation
    of bibliographic references to databases,
  • 9:11 - 9:14
    standardized CVs, or other applications.
  • 9:15 - 9:20
    It can also be linked to other
    identifiers such as Scopus,
  • 9:21 - 9:27
    Researcher ID, Author Resolver,
    Inspire, Aralis,
  • 9:27 - 9:30
    Ripec or LinkedIn.
  • 9:31 - 9:36
    The unique ORCID identifier
    is independent and standardized
  • 9:36 - 9:47
    in accordance with ISO 27729.2012.
  • 9:49 - 9:54
    It consists of 16 digits
    that form a unique, persistent code
  • 9:55 - 9:58
    associated with each author
    registered in the ORCID.
  • 10:00 - 10:06
    The ORCID is expressed as an HTTPS URL.
  • 10:07 - 10:18
    The 16 digit identifier is preceded
    by https://orcid.org.
  • 10:19 - 10:26
    A hyphen is inserted every 4 digits of
    the identifier to facilitate readability.
  • 10:28 - 10:34
    It is a unique personal code synchronized
    with the different identifiers
  • 10:34 - 10:37
    of each researcher
    in the main academic portals,
  • 10:38 - 10:42
    thereby making it easy
    for authors to share information,
  • 10:42 - 10:44
    promote scientific discovery,
  • 10:45 - 10:49
    and the visibility
    of research through databases,
  • 10:49 - 10:53
    platforms, and services
    that support research processes.
  • 10:54 - 10:56
    Some bibliographic databases
  • 10:56 - 11:02
    and platforms create
    their own researcher profiles to identify
  • 11:03 - 11:06
    and group publications by the same author.
  • 11:07 - 11:10
    These slides show links to some of them.
  • 11:11 - 11:15
    Web of Science Researcher ID,
    Scopus Author ID,
  • 11:16 - 11:18
    OpenAlex or Dimensions.
  • 11:20 - 11:23
    Best practices for digital
    profiles in research.
  • 11:25 - 11:30
    There are a number of essential pieces
    of information that must be included
  • 11:30 - 11:31
    when creating a profile.
  • 11:32 - 11:37
    Name: it is important to always
    use the same format for the name.
  • 11:38 - 11:42
    Some platforms allow you
    to enter several ways of expressing
  • 11:43 - 11:47
    the author's name and link them
    to a single affiliation.
  • 11:48 - 11:53
    Affiliation: register at least
    the researcher's main place of work.
  • 11:56 - 12:01
    Authorship and affiliation
    are two key aspects
  • 12:01 - 12:03
    for the correct identification
  • 12:03 - 12:08
    and retrieval of intellectual output
    in different databases.
  • 12:09 - 12:11
    Contact email address:
  • 12:11 - 12:15
    some platforms allow you
    to add your email address.
  • 12:15 - 12:19
    We recommend using your
    corporate email address.
  • 12:21 - 12:23
    Education and work experience:
  • 12:23 - 12:27
    this section should include
    the most relevant information.
  • 12:28 - 12:33
    Avoid registering short courses
    and instead cite master's degrees,
  • 12:34 - 12:36
    postgraduate training or doctorates.
  • 12:38 - 12:39
    Publications:
  • 12:40 - 12:46
    we recommend registering
    all publications indexed in databases,
  • 12:46 - 12:50
    priority being given to those
    with scientific content.
  • 12:52 - 12:56
    Some platforms allow you to select
    the articles you want to make visible
  • 12:57 - 13:01
    and to restrict access
    to others, which will remain hidden.
  • 13:03 - 13:04
    Funded projects:
  • 13:05 - 13:06
    it is important
  • 13:06 - 13:10
    to complete this section
    if you have obtained funding
  • 13:10 - 13:13
    through some type of call for proposals.
  • 13:14 - 13:16
    Securing funding in a call for proposals
  • 13:17 - 13:19
    is a criterion of excellence,
  • 13:19 - 13:22
    and it means that both the project
    and the researcher
  • 13:23 - 13:25
    meet high standards of quality.
  • 13:26 - 13:31
    It is advisable to keep your
    researcher profile up to date.
  • 13:33 - 13:35
    On the other hand,
    this is necessary
  • 13:35 - 13:40
    to ensure transparency
    about who we are and what we do
  • 13:40 - 13:44
    and, on the other hand,
    to demonstrate competence.
  • 13:45 - 13:50
    The better known a researcher is,
    the more professional opportunities
  • 13:50 - 13:54
    they will have and the more likely
    they are to be cited.
  • 13:54 - 13:58
    So, it is important to work on visibility.
  • 14:00 - 14:05
    The better known a researcher is,
    the more professional opportunities
  • 14:05 - 14:09
    they will have and the more likely
    they are to be cited.
  • 14:10 - 14:13
    So, it is important to work on visibility.
  • 14:16 - 14:19
    What can you do to improve
    your scientific visibility?
  • 14:21 - 14:23
    Create your digital identity.
  • 14:24 - 14:25
    Academic signature?
  • 14:26 - 14:28
    Register in ORCID.
  • 14:29 - 14:33
    Create your research profiles
    and keep them up to date.
  • 14:34 - 14:38
    ORCID profile, Google Scholar profile.
  • 14:39 - 14:40
    Boost your visibility.
  • 14:42 - 14:46
    Create a profile on at least
    one scientific social network,
  • 14:46 - 14:49
    ResearchGate or academia dot edu.
  • 14:49 - 14:55
    And make your research output
    known, respecting copyright.
  • 14:58 - 15:03
    Deposit your research output in open access
    institutional or thematic repositories.
  • 15:05 - 15:10
    Disseminate your research
    output on X, Facebook or blogs.
  • 15:12 - 15:19
    The video in this slide shows how to
    register and create an ORCID profile.
  • 15:20 - 15:22
    The links on this slide explain
  • 15:23 - 15:28
    how to create and update a
    researcher profile on Google Scholar.
  • 15:30 - 15:35
    Google Scholar Citations is a
    service offered by Google Scholar
  • 15:35 - 15:37
    that allows researchers
  • 15:37 - 15:39
    to create an academic profile,
  • 15:40 - 15:44
    which they can use to group and
    organize all the scientific output
  • 15:45 - 15:47
    that can be found in the search engine,
  • 15:48 - 15:53
    enabling other functions such
    as tracking citations received,
  • 15:54 - 15:57
    indicating who cited them
    and in which documents,
  • 15:58 - 16:05
    visualization, by means of a graph of
    the evolution of citations over time,
  • 16:06 - 16:13
    and metrics, number of
    citations, h index or i10 index.
  • 16:15 - 16:19
    The main advantages of this
    service are that it is free,
  • 16:20 - 16:22
    easy to create and update,
  • 16:22 - 16:24
    and provides high visibility
  • 16:25 - 16:27
    if our profile is public,
  • 16:27 - 16:32
    as Google Scholar is one of the
    most widely used search engines.
  • 16:35 - 16:35
    However,
  • 16:36 - 16:40
    although its coverage is
    broad, it is not exhaustive.
  • 16:41 - 16:46
    Furthermore, it does not differentiate
    between researchers with the same name,
  • 16:47 - 16:50
    So when publications
    are added automatically,
  • 16:51 - 16:57
    those of other authors are linked
    to the Google Scholar profile.
  • 16:59 - 17:01
    Thank you for your attention.
Title:
2025-07-03-digital_identity_digital_profiles.mp4
ASR Confidence:
1.00
Video Language:
English
Duration:
17:07

English subtitles

Incomplete

Revisions Compare revisions