< Return to Video

Ramesh Balsekar - Gut Schermau Seminar - 1998-06-27

  • 0:07 - 0:08
    I would very much like
  • 0:08 - 0:11
    if two, three, or four
  • 0:11 - 0:12
    would get up and tell me
  • 0:12 - 0:15
    what exactly they want
  • 0:15 - 0:17
    out of this seminar.
  • 0:22 - 0:25
    I rather expected this.
  • 0:26 - 0:28
    [Laughs]
  • 0:29 - 0:33
    So, my teaching is really based
  • 0:33 - 0:37
    on three very simple assumptions.
  • 0:38 - 0:43
    The first assumption is
  • 0:43 - 0:46
    that the totality of manifestation
  • 0:46 - 0:49
    has come from the Source.
  • 0:49 - 0:52
    The Source is only One.
  • 0:52 - 0:56
    So, in creating the manifestation,
  • 0:56 - 0:59
    the Source could not possibly
  • 0:59 - 1:01
    have taken
  • 1:01 - 1:04
    any other material from anywhere
  • 1:04 - 1:07
    to produce the manifestation.
  • 1:07 - 1:09
    So it must have been produced
  • 1:09 - 1:11
    out of Itself.
  • 1:11 - 1:13
    So, strictly therefore,
  • 1:13 - 1:15
    if the Source has
  • 1:15 - 1:18
    produced the manifestation,
  • 1:18 - 1:23
    if the Consciousness unmanifest
  • 1:23 - 1:25
    has become manifested,
  • 1:25 - 1:27
    if the potential energy
  • 1:27 - 1:30
    has become activized,
  • 1:30 - 1:33
    they are not two.
  • 1:33 - 1:36
    It is the same Consciousness
  • 1:36 - 1:37
    which was unmanifest
  • 1:37 - 1:41
    has become manifest.
  • 1:41 - 1:43
    Which is precisely
  • 1:43 - 1:44
    what Buddha meant
  • 1:44 - 1:46
    when he said:
  • 1:46 - 1:47
    Nirvana and Samsara
  • 1:47 - 1:52
    are one, not two.
  • 1:52 - 1:56
    Nirvana in action is Samsara.
  • 1:56 - 1:58
    When Samsara is not in action,
  • 1:58 - 2:00
    it is Nirvana.
  • 2:00 - 2:02
    They are not two.
  • 2:02 - 2:04
    Basically, that is the point.
  • 2:04 - 2:08
    They are not two.
  • 2:08 - 2:10
    And the human being
  • 2:10 - 2:14
    is part of that manifestation.
  • 2:14 - 2:17
    And what is the manifestation?
  • 2:17 - 2:22
    Totality of objects.
  • 2:22 - 2:24
    The totality of manifestation
  • 2:24 - 2:28
    is the totality of objects.
  • 2:28 - 2:32
    Which means, according to me,
  • 2:32 - 2:37
    the human being is an object.
  • 2:37 - 2:41
    The rock is an object,
  • 2:41 - 2:44
    the animal is an object,
  • 2:44 - 2:46
    the human being is an object,
  • 2:46 - 2:50
    with different characteristics.
  • 2:50 - 2:53
    The rock has no senses,
  • 2:53 - 2:54
    therefore the rock
  • 2:54 - 2:55
    does not need sensions
  • 2:55 - 2:57
    or consciousness
  • 2:57 - 3:01
    for the senses to work.
  • 3:01 - 3:03
    The animal has senses,
  • 3:03 - 3:07
    therefore it has sensions
  • 3:07 - 3:11
    which enables the senses to work.
  • 3:11 - 3:14
    But both the rock and the animal
  • 3:14 - 3:16
    are objects in the totality
  • 3:16 - 3:20
    of objects in the manifestation.
  • 3:20 - 3:23
    The human being, similarly,
  • 3:23 - 3:26
    is an object,
  • 3:26 - 3:30
    like the rock or the animal,
  • 3:30 - 3:32
    with the same sensions
  • 3:32 - 3:35
    as the animal has,
  • 3:35 - 3:39
    which enables the human being
  • 3:39 - 3:41
    to live his life
  • 3:41 - 3:43
    and for the senses to work.
  • 3:43 - 3:45
    The second thing
  • 3:45 - 3:51
    that my assumption is based on
  • 3:51 - 3:59
    is the statement of Lord Buddha.
  • 3:59 - 4:03
    In life, events happen,
  • 4:03 - 4:05
    deeds are done,
  • 4:05 - 4:10
    but there is no individual doer thereof.
  • 4:10 - 4:12
    The events and the deeds
  • 4:12 - 4:14
    are actions which happen
  • 4:14 - 4:16
    through any body-mind organisms,
  • 4:16 - 4:19
    or all body-mind organisms
  • 4:19 - 4:22
    together constitute the functioning
  • 4:22 - 4:25
    of that manifestation.
  • 4:25 - 4:30
    There is no individual doer thereof.
  • 4:30 - 4:33
    That is precisely
  • 4:33 - 4:34
    what Lord Krishna meant,
  • 4:34 - 4:40
    which is my third assumption.
  • 4:40 - 4:41
    Lord Krishna,
  • 4:41 - 4:44
    in the Bhagavad Gita, says:
  • 4:44 - 4:48
    You cannot commit a sin,
  • 4:48 - 4:55
    you cannot commit a meritorious deed,
  • 4:55 - 4:58
    you think in terms of sins
  • 4:58 - 5:02
    and meritorious deeds
  • 5:02 - 5:04
    because your knowledge
  • 5:04 - 5:07
    of your true nature
  • 5:07 - 5:13
    is clouded or enveloped by ignorance.
  • 5:13 - 5:18
    The word used is "ignorance".
  • 5:18 - 5:20
    And the ignorance which is referred to
  • 5:20 - 5:23
    in the Bhagavad Gita
  • 5:23 - 5:25
    is what we in modern times
  • 5:25 - 5:30
    use as the word "ego",
  • 5:30 - 5:33
    which is the basic problem
  • 5:33 - 5:38
    of the seeking.
  • 5:38 - 5:42
    Most teachings start with
  • 5:42 - 5:50
    the basic that it is your ego
  • 5:50 - 5:56
    which is the cause of all your suffering.
  • 5:56 - 5:57
    It is the ego which is
  • 5:57 - 6:01
    the cause of your suffering.
  • 6:01 - 6:07
    Therefore, you must kill the ego.
  • 6:07 - 6:09
    And in order to kill the ego,
  • 6:09 - 6:16
    various prescriptions are given.
  • 6:16 - 6:19
    So my question therefore is:
  • 6:19 - 6:22
    if the human being
  • 6:22 - 6:26
    is merely a created object
  • 6:26 - 6:27
    which is part of
  • 6:27 - 6:32
    the totality of manifestation,
  • 6:32 - 6:35
    where did this sense of individuality,
  • 6:35 - 6:37
    this ego,
  • 6:37 - 6:41
    which is supposed to be destroyed,
  • 6:41 - 6:44
    where did it come from?
  • 6:44 - 6:47
    Where could it have come from
  • 6:47 - 6:50
    except from the Source?
  • 6:50 - 6:55
    So, my concept is
  • 6:55 - 6:57
    that it is the same Source
  • 6:57 - 7:00
    which created the rock
  • 7:00 - 7:05
    and the animal with sensions,
  • 7:05 - 7:06
    and the human being
  • 7:06 - 7:09
    with sensions and intellect
  • 7:09 - 7:11
    which created the ego.
  • 7:11 - 7:14
    In fact, my concept is
  • 7:14 - 7:15
    that the thinking mind,
  • 7:15 - 7:18
    the intellect, the "me",
  • 7:18 - 7:20
    and the ego are names
  • 7:20 - 7:24
    for the same thing.
  • 7:24 - 7:27
    The intellect which considers
  • 7:27 - 7:32
    oneself as an individual
  • 7:32 - 7:34
    with a sense of personal doership
  • 7:34 - 7:40
    "I" do things, which is the ego.
  • 7:40 - 7:42
    So the "me"
  • 7:42 - 7:45
    to whom a prescription is given
  • 7:45 - 7:49
    to kill the ego
  • 7:49 - 7:52
    is the same thing.
  • 7:52 - 7:53
    I repeat:
  • 7:53 - 7:56
    you, to whom the prescriptions
  • 7:56 - 7:59
    are given,
  • 7:59 - 8:02
    to kill the ego
  • 8:02 - 8:05
    are not two.
  • 8:05 - 8:06
    So how can the ego
  • 8:06 - 8:10
    kill itself?
  • 8:10 - 8:14
    The ego cannot kill itself.
  • 8:14 - 8:18
    Therefore, my basic concept is
  • 8:18 - 8:20
    that only that power,
  • 8:20 - 8:21
    the Source,
  • 8:21 - 8:25
    which created the ego
  • 8:25 - 8:30
    can remove the ego
  • 8:30 - 8:31
    and that is precisely
  • 8:31 - 8:35
    what the source is doing.
Title:
Ramesh Balsekar - Gut Schermau Seminar - 1998-06-27
Video Language:
English
Duration:
08:39

English subtitles

Revisions Compare revisions